Abortion thread (Page 25/43)
MidEngineManiac MAY 03, 02:00 AM

quote
Originally posted by WonderBoy:

ray b and rinselberg accomplishments:

Too much Freedom=Chaos, then to Anarchy. Leftists way of life.

...



No, that's NOT caused by "too much freedom", that's caused by poor personal choices.

For those of us who have lived isolated/rural, we have 100% freedom. NOBODY around to get their panties wadded over a few rules getting bent. You wont find too much of that around those isolated homes, though. In fact, a large portion of the reason for being there is to get the hell away from that.
ray b MAY 03, 09:54 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/...rtion-003210049.html


"The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”


Leaks of SCOTUS decisions prior to being published are EXTREMELY RARE throughout the history of the U.S., so while this news should approached with an abundance of caution, the highly partisan and heated nature of this issue and the flood of leaks from all other branches of our government in the past years also tends to make a leak like this unsurprising if it did indeed happen.

I should also mention that, despite what the article says, abortion has been "a constitutionally protected right'.





the religious PIGS appointed to the the court by the nut-con's want to CON-TROLL
THEY FAIL TO UNDERSTAND 70% FAVOR THE CURRENT RULES

and your con's are only a 30% faction not a majority

by the way I expect a reaction as the 70% who are NOT con's VOTE
that will be a huge loss for the nut-conned at all levels of governments

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

olejoedad MAY 03, 10:12 AM
I think you have your percentages backwards, but that's not surprising to me.
Jake_Dragon MAY 03, 11:16 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:



https://www.yahoo.com/news/...rtion-003210049.html


"The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.

The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

-------------

NOTE: Leaks of SCOTUS decisions prior to being published are EXTREMELY RARE throughout the history of the U.S., so while this news should approached with an abundance of caution, the highly partisan and heated nature of this issue and the flood of leaks from all other branches of our government in the past years also tends to make a leak like this unsurprising if it did indeed happen.

I should also mention that, despite what the article says, abortion has never been "a constitutionally protected right'.





The news is very confusing. Nothing has been voted on and if it was then it is putting the power back in the states hands where they can choose what to uphold.
I think its along the same lines and "someone" colluded with the Russians. We know how that turned out.
The "Government" has grown too big and they are feeling that power slip so they react. Everyone votes then finds out it was fake or misleading. Rinse repeat.
ray b MAY 03, 11:37 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

I think you have your percentages backwards, but that's not surprising to me.



that is the con's MYTH

reality is 70 / 30 just in voter registrations

most independents do not have a nut-con spin
demo are 40 % ind 30% sorry but that only leaves 30% for the con's
no fake news or claims of non-existent frauds will change the numbers

your side after taking careful aim JUST SHOT THEIR OWN FOOT
NOV WILL SHOW THE RESULTS OF FAR LESS CON'S

[This message has been edited by ray b (edited 05-03-2022).]

olejoedad MAY 03, 12:49 PM
Are you familiar with the group Aerosmith.

You might want to listen to one of their popular songs, because the title sums up your argument.
Fats MAY 03, 02:06 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:


that is the con's MYTH

reality is 70 / 30 just in voter registrations

most independents do not have a nut-con spin
demo are 40 % ind 30% sorry but that only leaves 30% for the con's
no fake news or claims of non-existent frauds will change the numbers

your side after taking careful aim JUST SHOT THEIR OWN FOOT
NOV WILL SHOW THE RESULTS OF FAR LESS CON'S




You never say anything of value, and the more you use made-up words, the less sense you make man.

But hey, once you stoop to name calling, you have lost whatever argument you are in.
Using "There are more registered bla bla bla than the other guys" is a non starter dude, as there are many places that don't force you to register. It would only be a valid argument if you knew the number of republicans or democrats absolutely. You don't know the number, so anything you say on the subject is pulled from thin air.

[This message has been edited by Fats (edited 05-03-2022).]

ray b MAY 03, 02:26 PM
maybe if our snowfakes on the rightwings were a bit tougher

and a bit less on the total nutty side there would be no need to refer to them as such

but as long as you want rumps to be elected with LESS votes you have earned the nut prefix to your self labeled CON
and damm if I will type out nutty conservative just for your snowflake upset self so nut-con it is

and your side re enforces the nut label every time you attack the vax or masks or call middle of the road old joe a commie
or the 100's of other MYTHS you believe with out a bit of proof

your side works hard to earn that nut label be proud of it or try rational facts instead of MYTHS for a change
2.5 MAY 03, 02:29 PM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

no there is evil ...
the people who try to limit rights




It takes ignoring the beginning of an argument to get where you are.

Is killing babies evil?


quote
Originally posted by ray b:

BASIC QUESTION IS HOW MANY PEOPLE IS TOO MANY

IS 7.9 BILLION ENOUGH ?




Oh now I understand, its about math...
WonderBoy MAY 03, 02:45 PM
State rights are key. Keep fed gov small. But that's not acceptable to RATs nor the WEF and those that fund them.
One method of thought=RATs
One deity=RATs
One control=RATs
One order=NWO

Now the $$fundraising$$ is starting. Chuckles Schumer grand standing. Amazed at how quickly protesters and rabble-rousers showed up. So many premade protest signs and banners at the ready. Is there teleportation devices around that the public doesn't know of? Was the Watergate fully booked on Sunday?

Bras and high-heels are burning! P**nhub server capacity growing! Now the traffickers of 'parasites' and 'bio-matter', Planned SexualizeDaHood, are jumping in. They see their supply chain may dry/grow up. What to do?

MiKhelob Ultra