 
     |
| Abortion thread (Page 24/43) |
|
ray b
|
MAY 01, 02:23 PM
|
|
no dude will ever abort their kid
and if so against just do not do it yourself to a woman
BUT THAT IS NOT THE QUESTION
THE RELIGIOUS WANT TO CON-TROLL EVERY ONE
that is not freedom
that is not less government
that is what the god bothered want CON-TROLL
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 01, 04:02 PM
|
|
|
Those may be your beliefs, but the facts do not support your premise.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
MAY 01, 04:27 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Those may be your beliefs, but the facts do not support your premise. |
|
what facts ?
the con's do have many alt-true facts
many based on their buybull but not any real world based facts
there is no proof of any god even less of any god's plan
|
|
|
|
slicknick
|
MAY 01, 05:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Hudini:
"An ectopic pregnancy can't proceed normally. The fertilized egg can't survive, and the growing tissue may cause life-threatening bleeding, if left untreated."
You treat it. Stop with the BS questions. |
|
“Sen. Warren Hamilton, R-McCurtain, questioned why there were exceptions in the measure, including one for ectopic pregnancy.
Ectopic pregnancies occur when a fertilized egg implants and grows outside the uterus where it cannot survive. The condition can be deadly for women.
Hamilton, who supports abolishing all abortions, said the product of an ectopic pregnancy or the result of rape or incest deserve the same protections.”
Your anti abortion boys don’t care so stop with the BS assumptions and don’t act like these whackos are the exception.
https://tulsaworld.com/news...38-bf377ea55e8c.html
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 01, 05:41 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
what facts ?
the con's do have many alt-true facts
many based on their buybull but not any real world based facts
there is no proof of any god even less of any god's plan
|
|
Yup rayb, all of this universe is nothing but accidental, random chance.
There is no good, no evil. No morals, because where would something like morals come from if there is no good or evil?
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
MAY 01, 06:38 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Yup rayb, all of this universe is nothing but accidental, random chance.
There is no good, no evil. No morals, because where would something like morals come from if there is no good or evil? |
|
no there is evil
the Gop is evil
the people who try to limit rights
censor and restrict freedoms are evil
those why try to impose their morals on others are evil
if there is a plan for sure the god bothered have no idea what it is
you randy and your elk are active in working against peace and freedom------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 01, 06:54 PM
|
|
Your argument makes no sense.
But that isn't surprising to me, at all.
It's very apparent to me that you have no understanding of politics, history or the Constitution.
Keep on doing you, no one here is trying to interfere with your freedoms.
|
|
|
|
WonderBoy
|
MAY 01, 09:11 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
no there is evil
the Gop is evil
the people who try to limit rights
censor and restrict freedoms are evil
those why try to impose their morals on others are evil
if there is a plan for sure the god bothered have no idea what it is
you randy and your elk are active in working against peace and freedom
|
|
ray b and rinselberg accomplishments:
Too much Freedom=Chaos, then to Anarchy. Leftists way of life.
 
Sanctuary!
All caused by leftist policies, pushed by the author's of the NWO. Nancy Pee is currently over in Ukraine explaining to Pres Zielinski how to make Ukraine great again...
|
|
|
|
randye
|
MAY 02, 06:08 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
you randy and your elk are active in working against peace and freedom
|
|
What a coincidence. I was just out for a stroll with my elk today.
 [This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-02-2022).]
|
|
|
|
randye
|
MAY 02, 10:11 PM
|
|
https://www.yahoo.com/news/...rtion-003210049.html
"The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.
The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
-------------
NOTE: Leaks of SCOTUS decisions prior to being published are EXTREMELY RARE throughout the history of the U.S., so while this news should approached with an abundance of caution, the highly partisan and heated nature of this issue and the flood of leaks from all other branches of our government in the past years also tends to make a leak like this unsurprising if it did indeed happen.
I should also mention that, despite what the article says, abortion has never been "a constitutionally protected right'.
 [This message has been edited by randye (edited 05-03-2022).]
|
|
|
|