 
     |
| Why Alito must recuse himself from cases involving Donald Trump. (Page 2/7) |
|
olejoedad
|
MAY 25, 03:19 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
I read once that women are attracted to an Australian accent. So I use Australian punctuation to attract the ladies.
Notice how none of the women here are complaining?
|
|
Once a ftool, always a ftool.
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
MAY 29, 06:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
MAY 30, 08:45 AM
|
|
NEVER MIND THAT PIG
WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS
the ones put on the court by the rump himself
will they recluse ?
uncle tom should be in jail for bribes
or the lose cannon in the palm beach secrets case
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
MAY 30, 10:11 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
NEVER MIND THAT PIG
WHAT ABOUT THE OTHERS
the ones put on the court by the rump himself
will they recluse ?
uncle tom should be in jail for bribes
or the lose cannon in the palm beach secrets case |
|
HATE IS ALL YOU KNOW.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
MAY 30, 03:18 PM
|
|
I am not paying to read this.
can you explain why he praises Alito?
|
|
|
|
randye
|
MAY 31, 06:40 AM
|
|
https://thelibertydaily.com...ors-request-discuss/
"Chief Justice John Roberts on Thursday rejected a request by Democratic senators to meet and discuss their claims about ethics issues on the Supreme Court, suggesting it would be unwise to meet with members of only one political party."
"Roberts told the senators he must “respectfully decline” the meeting request, citing “separation of powers concerns” and “the importance of judicial independence” while suggesting it would be “inadvisable” to meet only with members of one political party."
“In regard to questions concerning any Justice’s participation in pending cases, the Members of the Supreme Court recently reaffirmed the practice we have followed for 235 years pursuant to which individual Justices decide recusal issues,” Roberts wrote, making a reference to the ethics code the Supreme Court adopted in November 2023."
The Leftoid morons in Congress just cannot seem to grasp the Constitutional concept of separation of powers.
Kudos to Chief Justice Roberts for taking on the impossible task of attempting to teach them.
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
MAY 31, 09:06 AM
|
|
so basically they have no ethic's or standards
and as uncle tom got his motor home, mom's house, kids ed, and other BRIBES
BUT ONLY FROM SUPER RICH RIGHTWINGERS THATS OK
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
MAY 31, 06:57 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
so basically they have no ethic's or standards
and as uncle tom got his motor home, mom's house, kids ed, and other BRIBES
BUT ONLY FROM SUPER RICH RIGHTWINGERS THATS OK |
|
Uncle Tom Sounds pretty racist.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JUN 01, 12:36 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
so basically they have no ethic's or standards
|
|
No ethics or standards, just like that judge Juan Merchan that you keep ranting about how he should have "reclused" himself.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JUN 01, 09:37 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
The Leftoid morons in Congress just cannot seem to grasp the Constitutional concept of separation of powers.
Kudos to Chief Justice Roberts for taking on the impossible task of attempting to teach them. |
|
Ever heard of "checks and balances". Roberts can be impeached by congress if he keeps insisting that the Supreme Court answers to no one.
We are not close to that point, but it could become an issue if the SCOTUS can not maintain the appearance of impartiality. There is no Constitutional requirement of "high crimes" to impeach a judge. All it requires is poor behavior.
Right now the Republicans are trying to support a crook by claiming the entire justice system is corrupt. The government can not function without public faith in the court system.[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 06-01-2024).]
|
|
|
