 
     |
| A 2nd Amendment Right or Maybe Not (Page 2/4) |
|
blackrams
|
OCT 24, 09:10 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Ron, read the article.
The online seller ships to a FFL gun store who runs the background check.
( which shoots holes in the MSM claim that firearms can be bought online with no background check)
The FFL has the responsibility to not sell if anything about any about the customer suspicious. |
|
Ya know Joe, I read that article twice before posting it. Shrug................ 
------------------
Rams
Learning most of life's lessons the hard way. .
You are only young once but, you can be immature indefinitely.
|
|
|
blackrams
|
OCT 24, 09:12 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
You are probably right. I thought the same thing.
Still, It will be interesting to watch. |
|
Yep, I'm thinking this will be seen in the courts.
Rams
|
|
|
|
theBDub
|
OCT 24, 10:50 PM
|
|
Political affiliation is not a protected class.
If it was due to color, sex, etc., that’s illegal. Discrimination on political affiliation is legal (federally—not sure about Oregon).
This reeks of a plant though. I’m just not sure I totally buy it.
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
OCT 24, 11:01 PM
|
|
The guy is a "political activist" from Denver, CO.
 [This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 10-24-2023).]
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
OCT 24, 11:57 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by theBDub:
Political affiliation is not a protected class.
If it was due to color, sex, etc., that’s illegal. Discrimination on political affiliation is legal (federally—not sure about Oregon).
This reeks of a plant though. I’m just not sure I totally buy it. |
|
From the FFL Dealer Network guidebook...
|
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
OCT 25, 07:36 AM
|
|
|
Who has a business card in which they put their political affiliation, and things like ANTIFA and Gangstalking?
|
|
|
cliffw
|
OCT 25, 08:04 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
The guy is a "political activist" from Denver, CO.
|
|
All of my thoughts have been raised but one.
What kind of business is he hawking with his business card ?
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
OCT 25, 08:54 AM
|
|
wonder if we had granted the natives 2nd A rights
if that could have gone a bit differently ?
|
|
|
|
williegoat
|
OCT 25, 09:20 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cliffw:
What kind of business is he hawking with his business card ? |
|
He is in the business of shirt stirring. He is a professional troublemaker. Think Fred Toast, who also lived in Denver, before his exile to a ghost town.
His role, in the big scheme of things, is as a thorn in the side of civilized society. He sees it as a noble pursuit.
|
|
|
cliffw
|
OCT 25, 04:25 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams:
I'm in a similar position as Willie, while I have strong 2nd Amendment opinions, the weapon is only in the store owner's possession due to the shipping requirements. I assume any required background checks have already been pursued and satisfied. Maybe, maybe not. On the other hand, if the shop owner has the responsibility and right to withhold that weapon, then.............................. Well, I just don't know. |
|
| quote | Originally posted by Raydar:
A while back, a gay couple sued a bakery who didn't want to bake a cake for their wedding. Seems like they (the couple) lost that suit. 2nd amendment aside, might this be a similar situation.
|
|
I think it is exactly the same. The ya-who did not have to have that gun shipped to that store. He also did not need the give his business card. The right to keep and bear arms does not make it a right to be able to get arms anywhere you want.
|
|
|
|