

 |
| Supreme Court leak (Page 2/3) |
|
williegoat
|
JAN 20, 07:39 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by slicknick:
Alito leaked it himself to corner anyone who was waffling on it.
|
|
Another baseless allegation. You only say this because you disagree with his opinion.
You and rinselberg both made wild accusations based only on your own personal biases. Both of you share a left leaning perspective and both have suggested that the crime was committed by a right leaning suspect. Everyone else only wants the truth.
Folks, this is why the country is divided.
Prove me wrong.
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 20, 09:01 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
That is a baseless allegation. You just don't like her.
Prove me wrong.
|
|
It's not his baseless allegation.
He is simply parroting someone else's baseless allegation:
Leftists have no originality of thought.
That guy talks and acts like a sociopath.
.
| quote | Originally posted by williegoat:
Another baseless allegation. You only say this because you disagree with his opinion.
You and rinselberg both made wild accusations based only on your own personal biases. Both of you share a left leaning perspective and both have suggested that the crime was committed by a right leaning suspect. Everyone else only wants the truth.
Folks, this is why the country is divided.
Prove me wrong. |
|
I'm really amused at the elaborate stories and rationales that Leftists will concoct to try to make their whackadoodle world view fit.
...and the whackadoodle media crap that they will mindlessly parrot.[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-21-2023).]
|
|
|
Notorio
|
JAN 21, 12:19 AM
|
|
This might be a good time to recall the wisdom of Ben Franklin: 'The only way three people can keep a secret is if two of them are dead.'
I believe the most likely scenario is a high-level Leaker (1), then the lackey who transmitted the document (2), and then the 'journalist' who received it (3). Three people. Eventually the story will come out (but it might be a long, long time.) The thing that bothers me the most is that this having been done 'successfully' once, it will be done again. It doesn't make our Country better, safer, or more just.
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 21, 01:04 AM
|
|
| quote | ]Originally posted by slicknick: Alito leaked it himself to corner anyone who was waffling on it. Any 180 by a justice after a leak would’ve been seen as pandering to public outcry instead of interpreting the law blindly. It was a slick move. |
|
Bingo! I'd put "17th century witch hunter" Sam right up there with Ginni Thomas on my list of suspects.[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-21-2023).]
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JAN 21, 06:44 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Notorio:
This might be a good time to recall the wisdom of Ben Franklin: 'The only way three people can keep a secret is if two of them are dead.'
I believe the most likely scenario is a high-level Leaker (1), then the lackey who transmitted the document (2), and then the 'journalist' who received it (3). Three people. Eventually the story will come out (but it might be a long, long time.) The thing that bothers me the most is that this having been done 'successfully' once, it will be done again. It doesn't make our Country better, safer, or more just. |
|
You are correct.
The new leak is that Sotomayor health is declining fast, and the leftist are losing their poop over it. They want her to retire before the Lyin' Biden term is up so he can select another identity politics judge, preferably a Trans to replace her.
They are afraid she will RBG herself in office after 2024.
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 21, 07:33 PM
|
|
| quote | | That guy talks and acts like a sociopath. |
|
And walks like an Egyptian.
Why I say that? Scroll back to the place where Lawrence O'Donnell first became part of the conversation. That's neither here nor there, but here's something that's in a state of quantum superposition—an uncollapsed probability wave function (de Broglie)—and so it's both here and there. To wit:
Just about halfway through this (YouTube) segment, MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell raises a pertinent question. The report that comes from the leak investigation wastes no time in describing a motive for the leak—"a ... misguided attempt at protest"—but upon what evidence? Since the report has not identified the leaker(s), what basis is there for describing the leak as a "protest"..?
This is free online access to the 23-page report about the leak investigation: https://www.supremecourt.go..._January_19_2023.pdf[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-21-2023).]
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 21, 07:59 PM
|
|
| quote |
The report that comes from the leak investigation wastes no time in describing a motive for the leak—"a ... misguided attempt at protest"...
|
|
No it didn't.
Not even the "STATEMENT OF THE COURT CONCERNING THE LEAK INVESTIGATION" said any such thing.

Leftists gotta Leftist ....and that includes concocting fraudulent quotes and pushing false narratives
.
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
I'm really amused at the elaborate stories and rationales that Leftists will concoct to try to make their whackadoodle world view fit.
|
|
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-21-2023).]
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 26, 10:21 AM
|
|
| quote | That guy [Lawrence O'Donnell] talks and acts like a sociopath. |
|
Something another forum member posted earlier in this thread.
This prompted me to go online and dig up a little more about Lawrence O'Donnell. Here's some things I hadn't known.
Lawrence O'Donnell attended a Catholic high school (I already knew that) in a suburb of Boston, where he was captain of the baseball team and wide receiver on the football team. He graduated from Saint Sebastian's in 1970. After Saint Sebastian's, he continued his formal education as a university undergraduate or college student, earning a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1976. He majored in Economics.
| quote | After college, O’Donnell tried his hand at teaching and became a substitute in the Boston public schools in the run-up to the busing crisis of 1974-75. He taught at a wide array of schools, including Girls Latin Academy in Codman Square. The experience not only inspired his first magazine article, published in Boston Magazine in 1980, but it forged his thinking on public education for life.
“It made me think in terms of the individual faces I’m seeing in front of me and which of these kids can be saved,” says O’Donnell, who today serves as a board member for a Dorchester school, Codman Academy. |
|
| quote | | In a 2005 interview, O'Donnell called himself a "practical European socialist". O'Donnell also declared himself a "socialist" on the November 6, 2010, Morning Joe show, stating: "I am not a progressive. I am not a liberal who is so afraid of the word that I had to change my name to 'progressive'. Liberals amuse me. I am a socialist. I live to the extreme left, the extreme left of you mere liberals." On the August 1, 2011, episode of The Last Word, O'Donnell further explained: "I have been calling myself a socialist ever since I first read the definition of socialism in the first economics class I took in college". |
|
"Lawrence O'Donnell" page on Wikiipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_O%27Donnell
"Lawrence O’Donnell, MSNBC's anti-anchorman, guided by Dot sensibilities" Bill Forry for the Dorchester Reporter; November 7, 2012. https://www.dotnews.com/201...-has-dot-street-cred
I haven't figured out "Dot sensibilities". I think it might be a literary reference, to a fictional character called "Dot". If that's the case, it strikes me as a rather obscure reference. I also think maybe it has something to do with Dorchester. I can't see it being a reference to the Department of Transportation. Could it be the "dot" in "dot (.) com"..?[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-26-2023).]
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 26, 07:35 PM
|
|
|
That guy talks and acts like a sociopath.
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JAN 26, 11:37 PM
|
|
|
Laurence O'Donnell is kind of whacko too.....
|
|

 |
|