Ukraine is screwed.......... (Page 2/19)
82-T/A [At Work] JAN 21, 09:05 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:

So, we're headed into another but more intense coldwar with even less support from our NATO Allies?

Rams




Much of Europe is /very/ socialist and sympathetic to communism. This was a war that was fought, and lost, during the 1950s and 1960s. Even with the fall of the Berlin wall, and the obvious failure of the USSR... Russia's investments in these countries were wildly successful.

During the 1950s-1970s, Russia and the US spent 100s of billions (yesterday's value) on propaganda. The USSR sponsored the Communist party in every country they could get one to actually stick. They infiltrated political groups everywhere they could, and pushed hard. Alternately, the United States was always on the defense... and they sponsored anyone that we felt would be competitive against the Communist party. In many cases, this meant sponsoring the Socialist leaning parties.

What resulted? We now have an extremely liberal society in both South America and Western Europe, created by both Russia and the United States.

I don't know that we had any alternative, quite honestly... would we just allow the USSR to fund the Communist party unabated? What would Europe look like now? What we have now was the alternative.

Unfortunately, they're wildly sympathetic to Russia, and they always have been. When I was growing up, I used to visit the Netherlands every summer since that's where my dad was from, and I had dozens of cousins... I mean a lot. My dad had 5 siblings, and each had 2-3 kids. They loved coming to America because everything was big... (everything from boobs to big semi trucks, which they'd never seen before). But it never stopped my cousins from telling me how they felt Russia was better than the US. They said... "Russia will take over the US..." etc. This was in the 1980s of course, so the propaganda was still rampant in their schools.

But these people are all adults, all my age... in their early 40s. They are the ones now making decisions for Europe, and in government.


That's a long way of me saying that I totally agree with you, we will likely go into another cold war, with significantly less support to our allies. We'll probably eventually be looked upon as the French are to the United States. Even though the French helped us win the Revolutionary War through their significant support to the Continental Army, we look at them today as fools and idiots (common consensus in the United States)... because no one remembers.


The good thing is, Russia is a shadow of its former self (as you well know yourself) when they were the USSR. They are a poor nation desperately seeking relevance. Even with our berated, demoralized, and woke military brass, Russia still wouldn't hold a candle to us. As an example, last time I checked, they only have two air craft carriers. One of them isn't running, and the other has significant fire damage. Both are from the 1980s and are ski-slope carriers. For countries like this, they have to focus their efforts on things they can allow themselves to be superior on... like hyper-sonic missiles and other technology that can give them an edge where sheer power fails. The overwhelming vast majority of their nuclear weapons are 1980s or older-era technology. They've recently begun redeveloping some new stuff with hyper-sonic technology, but they simply don't have that in numbers... though it might not matter if we cannot intercept these. End of the day, a nuclear war with them means absolute death for their entire country, and only some devastation for us.


Gone are the days when Russia had the power and money to build air bases all over the world:



Personally, my opinion is that we should have begun arming Ukraine and supporting them with better conventional hardware and surface to air missile intercept deployments. We should have done this from the very beginning. We don't have to get involved in a fight per-se, but we can leverage our power to ensure one does not happen. What Biden seems to be doing is basically telling Russia... if you want to come across, we won't do anything. And as MJ has stated, don't expect any support from Germany and the rest of Europe other than some harshly written PDF letters sent by e-mail.

[This message has been edited by 82-T/A [At Work] (edited 01-21-2022).]

sourmash JAN 21, 09:07 AM

quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

not like the last one. just more intense only because the public has more access to news overseas now, but colder than last cold war. There won't be disposale tank companiess on the Fulda Gap or 200,000 US troops garrisoned in Germay this time. All the hardware is already built. Biggest concern is if Xi gets emboldened by what Putin does and at what Washington's response (or lack thereof) is. It's about big $$ in Europe this time and about rhetoric in the West Pacific. Not about military power and land.




You mean if XI gets gets emboldened by how the USA failed in Afghanistan and gets fed up with the USA constantly meddling in every facet of China's and Russia's dealings.

Boomer mentality is still upside down in understanding. It thinks we're the good guy.
sourmash JAN 21, 09:33 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
Much of Europe is /very/ socialist and sympathetic to communism. This was a war that was fought, and lost, during the 1950s and 1960s. Even with the fall of the Berlin wall, and the obvious failure of the USSR... Russia's investments in these countries were wildly successful.

During the 1950s-1970s, Russia and the US spent 100s of billions (yesterday's value) on propaganda. The USSR sponsored the Communist party in every country they could get one to actually stick. They infiltrated political groups everywhere they could, and pushed hard. Alternately, the United States was always on the defense...


Uh, no. The USA was constantly on the march. It played offense and defense as it went along. The propaganda machine told you it was just defense. Afterall, we funded and armed the USSR, making into an entity that we could match against later. We gave them.half of Europe on purpose in a meeting in Feb 1945 in Yalta. Look.up where Yalta is located. It ain't Club Med.


quote
and they sponsored anyone that we felt would be competitive against the Communist party. In many cases, this meant sponsoring the Socialist leaning parties.

What resulted? We now have an extremely liberal society in both South America and Western Europe, created by both Russia and the United States.

I don't know that we had any alternative, quite honestly... would we just allow the USSR to fund the Communist party unabated? What would Europe look like now? What we have no is the alternative.

Unfortunately, they're wildly sympathetic to Russia, and they always have been. When I was growing up, I used to visit the Netherlands every summer since that's where my dad was from, and I had dozens of cousins... I mean a lot. My dad had 5 siblings, and each had 2-3 kids. They loved coming to America because everything was big... (everything from boobs to big semi trucks, which they'd never seen before). But it never stopped my cousins from telling me how they felt Russia was better than the US. They said... "Russia will take over the US..." etc. This was in the 1980s of course, so the propaganda was still rampant in their schools.



You never stop using the word Russia instead of what it really was; the USSR.


quote
That's a long way of me saying that I totally agree with you, we will likely go into another cold war, with significantly less support to our allies. We'll probably eventually be looked upon as the French are to the United States. Even though the French helped us win the Revolutionary War through their significant support to the Continental Army, we look at them today as fools and idiots (common consensus in the United States)... because no one remembers.



You do know our soldiers are becoming transsexuals now, and that our government pays them for that, right?


quote
The good thing is, Russia is a shadow of its former self (as you well know yourself) when they were the USSR.



No, that's a total non-sequitur. They have no affiliation with the USSR. The statement you made has no credible basis.


quote
Gone are the days when Russia had the power and money to build air bases all over the world:



Russia never built air bases all over the world as you're claiming.


quote
Personally, my opinion is that we should have begun arming Ukraine and supporting them with better conventional hardware and surface to air missile intercept deployments. We should have done this from the very beginning. We don't have to get involved in a fight per-se, but we can leverage our power to ensure one does not happen.



You really just won't ever understand that we're the reason there is a fight there right now.
It's our goal to make every nation on Earth to come under the thumb of woke, to accept infinity 3rd world migrants and to upend the natural order of the nuclear family.



quote
What Biden seems to be doing is basically telling Russia... if you want to come across, we won't do anything. And as MJ has stated, don't expect any support from Germany and the rest of Europe other than some harshly written PDF letters sent by e-mail.



That's just parroting. German officials, including Merkel, knows who was spying on them down to their personal cell phones. They know the USA isn't going to heat their houses. The USA is a failed state.

[This message has been edited by sourmash (edited 01-21-2022).]

82-T/A [At Work] JAN 21, 09:58 AM

quote
Originally posted by sourmash:

<stuff...>




I read everything you said, but I think you are looking at things from a very radical approach. The United States absolutely does have intent and interest in maintaining world-power, and we engage in a lot of global manipulation; however, you greatly misstate the extent, and seem to believe the United States (as a willing country) is leading the charge in reshaping the world into some crazy single-world Government.

The United States is /as much/ a victim of a push towards a one-world Government, as other countries are. This is as a result of powerful oligarchs that reside in the US, Europe, Russia, middle-east, etc. The rest of your comments are wildly inaccurate, so respectfully, I won't waste my time on a back and forth.
blackrams JAN 21, 10:03 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
I won't waste my time on a back and forth.



I'm still searching for that ignore function.

Rams

MidEngineManiac JAN 21, 10:15 AM
The NWO/One World Government is a creation of the bankers/corprocrats, NOT governments.

Do you REALLY think any government on this planet has enough brains to pull that one off ?????
sourmash JAN 21, 10:47 AM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

I read everything you said, but I think you are looking at things from a very radical approach. The United States absolutely does have intent and interest in maintaining world-power, and we engage in a lot of global manipulation; however, you greatly misstate the extent, and seem to believe the United States (as a willing country) is leading the charge in reshaping the world into some crazy single-world Government.



To be exact, the reality is that the US military, CIA and State Dept are used as a means to force the entire world into submitting to one order.


quote
The United States is /as much/ a victim of a push towards a one-world Government, as other countries are. This is as a result of powerful oligarchs that reside in the US, Europe, Russia, middle-east, etc. The rest of your comments are wildly inaccurate, so respectfully, I won't waste my time on a back and forth.



There's only 1 way to view it. Reality. You're living in 1980s propaganda land.

The oligarchs are very specifically NOT in Russia and were defanged there by Putin. Putin was placed in power by them and he ultimately betrayed them by giving the country back to Russians. THAT is main reason Russia is targeted.
Victoria Nudleman Nuland, look at her Wikipedia Early Life drop down. See where family came from?

Putin denied any person holding dual citizenship or even having traveled with a passport from holding some top positions, because they repeatedly betrayed Russian interests. Dual citizens rule the US government and our policies of foreign aggression.

Russia is not the USSR. The system was destroyed. The people were forced out of power. They held it briefly after the USSR. Not anymore.

Everything I said that you cant address is not possible for you to refute.

We are not fighting for the American family, nor family values.

You are here weekly complaining about what the US is doing to us just as I am and still you're presenting us as the good guy in international affairs.
randye JAN 21, 08:39 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:

Personally, my opinion is that we should have begun arming Ukraine and supporting them with better conventional hardware and surface to air missile intercept deployments.





A few days ago I ran across this article discussing Ukraine:



When I examined the photo more closely it was obvious to me that the Ukraine forces might have a big problem:





The Kalashnikov rifle in all of it's variants is one of the most prolific and cheap small arms on the planet so this kind of photo has to make you wonder.
MidEngineManiac JAN 21, 08:47 PM
Meh.

Some kind of punishment (no rifle for you !) maybe...or recruits not yet qualified on it ? The guy on the right sure isnt scanning for anything besides the gravel right in front of him.

[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 01-21-2022).]

blackrams JAN 21, 08:52 PM

quote
Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:

Meh.

Some kind of punishment (no rifle for you !) maybe...or recruits not yet qualified on it ? The guy on the right sure isnt scanning for anything besides the gravel right in front of him.




Hey Bubba, you don't recognize an IED/Mine specialist?

Rams