 
     |
| "2000 Mules" (Page 19/22) |
|
ray b
|
JUN 05, 09:10 PM
|
|
why do you think you are so entitled to details you can QUIBBLE OVER ?
AKA WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
JUN 05, 09:20 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
HOW?
HOW exactly did you "support" him?
|
|
WHILE WE ARE ASKING
how did you support BuSh2 in dollars and in hours
same for Mcsame and Rmoney
and the rump detail both 16 and post 16 lies about illegal votes
and the midterms
also 2020 pre electing and post election lies about the rump hours and money
be ezact and provide all data soonest
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JUN 05, 09:44 PM
|
|
Stop trying to evade the question and stop trying to deflect.
YOU made the claim, YOU back it up.
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
I supported AUH2O In 64
|
|
HOW?
HOW exactly did you "support" him?
..
Leftists gotta Leftist[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-05-2022).]
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
JUN 05, 10:27 PM
|
|
''The incumbent vs. system affect distinction is basic in the conceptualization of political support. It is based on the premise that system affect is a more important antecedent of aggressive political behavior than incumbent affect. The data reported here show that it is possible to distinguish incumbent from system affect empirically, and also theoretically important to make the incumbent-system distinction. Measures especially sensitive to incumbent affect correlate differently with ideology than does a measure especially sensitive to system affect. Byvariate correlations between measures of incumbent affect and a measure of aggressive political behavior are shown to be either spurious or indirect, due to the fact that incumbent affect is correlated with what appears to be a more powerful and direct antecedent of aggressive political behavior, namely, system affect. The theory behind the incumbent-system distinction is expressed in four propositions. In general, the data conform to it, but each prediction is qualified according to whether ideology and community context are inhibitory or facilitative.''
https://www.cambridge.org/c...0BD56BC7C8FEC8D7F134------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JUN 05, 10:48 PM
|
|
Stop trying to evade the question and stop trying to deflect.
YOU made the claim, YOU back it up.
| quote | Originally posted by ray b:
I supported AUH2O In 64
|
|
HOW?
HOW exactly did you "support" him?
..
Leftists gotta Leftist[This message has been edited by randye (edited 06-05-2022).]
|
|
|
|
ray b
|
JUN 05, 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JUN 13, 11:56 AM
|
|
Jan. 6 hearings... Bill Barr taking an "ugly stick" to the 2000 Mules documentary. Describes the movie as (in so many words) a "mockumentary."
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JUN 13, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JUN 13, 12:54 PM
|
|
"Come On-A My House" and watch these January 6 committee hearings! What's not to like?
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
JUN 13, 05:58 PM
|
|
Come let me show how the best governor in the nation does it.
|
|
|
