

 |
| Joe Biden and Classified Documents (Page 16/17) |
|
blackrams
|
JAN 26, 07:18 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
The media initially reported the numbers of Trump as "files", but Biden's numbers were reported as "items".
Were Biden's "items" actually folders, or were they boxes or filing cabinets?
Why were what was found reported using different descriptors? |
|
I think the description may depend on the time frame we're talking about.
The classified files he had from when he was a Senator (that he wasn't authorized to have in his possession), the Classified boxes of items he has from when he was VP (that he wasn't authorized to have in his possession) or, the items that we kept secured next to his Corvette while he's POTUS (that he left with his drug addicted son and doesn't know why there were there).
BTW, I've heard our President say that there was no "There There". Sorry but that makes absolutely no sense to me. WTF is he talking about?
Rams
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 26, 08:46 PM
|
|
| quote |
Taking Trump first, I see N = 160 Secret + 60 Top Secret = 220, and T = 4 years = 1424 days (approximate, but close). So Trump's N/T = 220/1424 = 0.15 per diem.
Now, Biden. I see N = 12 and T = 60 years (roughly) = 21360 days (roughly), for a Biden N/T of 12/21360 or 0.0006 per diem.
On this basis, Trump is 0.15/0.0006 or 250 times more egregious than Biden, in terms of unauthorized document retention per day of federal employment.
|
|
Someone famous once said something about precisely that kind of bullshittery...
OH YES, now I remember:
Click to show[This message has been edited by randye (edited 01-27-2023).]
|
|
|
82-T/A [At Work]
|
JAN 27, 03:10 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
Someone famous once said something about precisely this kind of bullshittery...
OH YES, now I remember:
Click to show
|
|
I'm very much stealing that...
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 27, 07:47 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]: I'm very much stealing that...
|
|
Help yourself, it's not classified.
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JAN 28, 12:12 AM
|
|
|
The only top secret classified document that we know is secured is the Epstein's client list.
|
|
|
cliffw
|
JAN 28, 07:55 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by blackrams: I've heard our President say that there was no "There There". Sorry but that makes absolutely no sense to me. WTF is he talking about?
|
|
I have no clue WTF he is talking about Ronald, um, Ron.
If there was no there there, where was there at ?
If there was no there there, what was there ?[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 01-28-2023).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 28, 08:00 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by cliffw:
I have no clue WTF he is talking about Ronald, um, Ron.
If there was no there there, were was there at ?
If there was no there there, what was there ? |
|
Cliff,
Edited: Please get the name right or don't use it. I'd hate for anyone to get confused and start thinking I was posting some of the garbage other people with similar names post.
Apparently, neither one of us gets out enough.......... Or, President Biden is living in his own little world, has gone down the proverbial rabbit hole or, is just frigg'n lost. 
Rams[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 01-28-2023).]
|
|
|
cliffw
|
JAN 28, 08:04 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg: A different light? |
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:
 |
|
| quote | Originally posted by rinselberg:Of course, these are just the numbers of documents that were reported in CNN on January 11. I don't know how the numbers might have changed since then. I wouldn't think that Trump's would be any different, but Biden's? Could yet another trove of classified documents have been turned up that are linked to Biden, but there's not been public disclosure?
I just have what's been reported publicly.
|
|
No, you have what CNN (Counterfeit News Network) wants you to think. Do you ever ask questions about what you are told to believe ?
Biden had plenty of time to wipe, with a cloth, his guilt free. 120 days to self report, when they knew the story was going to break in the news ?
I guess you believe in co-inky-dinks .
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 30, 02:01 PM
|
|
The News Gods are pleased to add some "color"to the coverage.
 | | CLICK FOR FULL SIZE |
The University of Pennsylvania selected rand* for construction services for the interior spaces of the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, located at the prestigious Washington DC address of 101 Constitution Avenue.
| quote | | The project was a highly custom design featuring custom: wood floors, millwork, glass, lighting, and drywall finishes. The office spaces wrap around a rotunda that required all custom pieces for the finishes. All doors in the project were unique sizes and fabricated specifically for the project requiring coordinated shop drawings with the adjacent glass and millwork wraps. Due to schedule constraints, millwork cabinets were fabricated off-site using hold-to dimensions were [sic] topped with lacquer panels both inside and outside the cabinets to have a uniform finish. The kitchen appliances were cladded in custom millwork panels to match the design language of the kitchen. |
|
That's one "were" too many in the sentence that I highlighted with the "sic" convention for flagging a grammatical error. Surprising, on a webpage that's obviously meant to put the rand* construction company's best foot forward.
Includes five photographs of the interior spaces. https://randcc.com/projects/upenn-biden-center/[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-30-2023).]
|
|
|
blackrams
|
JAN 31, 07:41 AM
|
|
|

 |
|