Carbon dioxide hysteria (Page 154/170)
cliffw FEB 27, 09:44 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
I can't remember how many stories I've heard about people with agricultural land expressing strong negative reactions—like olejoedad—to agrivoltaics.



Tell us about one that YOU heard. Or, do you hear about from an anonymous source, or hear say ?
cliffw FEB 27, 09:51 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Suddenly, the same land owners became agrivoltaics evangelists, encouraging their neighbors to consider it for themselves!



Can you walk and chew bubble gum at the same time ? I encourage you to try. If you get good at it, learn to blow bubbles at the same time.

Why are solar farms not growing crops already ? Those windmills. Tell me about them. Did they buy all the land their farms are on ?

rinselberg FEB 27, 11:02 AM

quote
As of March 2023, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory had identified 314 agrivoltaic projects in the United States representing over 2.8GW of solar capacity. Most were focused on grazing and pollinator habitat, with relatively [few] integrating crop production.


"Agrivoltaics: Solar and Agriculture Co-Location"
Solar Energy Technologies Office; U.S. Department of Energy.
https://www.energy.gov/eere...20crop%20production.
cliffw FEB 28, 07:56 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Can you think of any drawbacks to using fossil fuels for energy?



No. Tell us of just one.


quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Even if you believe that more carbon dioxide is a good thing, there are other environmental impacts from the oil and gas industry and the coal industry, and they mostly come as environmental damage and not benefits for the environment. Or would you even argue with that?



I would be glad to discuss that.

Even if you believe that the farcical green energy is a good thing, there are many environmental impacts from the stupidity.
rinselberg FEB 28, 09:29 AM
CLICK FOR FULL SIZE


"Scientists Are Freaking Out About Ocean Temperatures"

quote
“It’s like an omen oven of the future.”


David Gelles for the New York Times; February 27, 2024.
https://www.nytimes.com/202...an-temperatures.html
ray b FEB 28, 09:34 AM
arctic ice is far less the NORTHEAST PASSAGE IS IN USE

AND THE NORTHWEST IS USABLE


NOW THE ANTARCTIC ICE IS ALSO GREATLY REDUCED

[MEDIA=youtube]eGkJSEOd1R4[/MEDIA]

https://youtu.be/eGkJSEOd1R4
ray b FEB 28, 09:38 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


I would be glad to discuss that.

Even if you believe that the farcical green energy is a good thing, there are many environmental impacts from the stupidity.



FLORIDA IS DOOMED BY THE LIES OF THE RIGHTWING OIL CORP'S

ICE ICE BABY IT IS MELTING

THE SEA WILL RISE

KOCH BRO'S WILL INCREASE THEIR PROFITS
olejoedad FEB 28, 10:24 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

"Agrivoltaics: Solar and Agriculture Co-Location"
Solar Energy Technologies Office; U.S. Department of Energy.
https://www.energy.gov/eere...20crop%20production.



You do realize that the Dept of Energy is run by a complete partisan idiot?
We had eight long years of her as governor.
She is a moron, and driving a political, not scientific, agenda
rinselberg FEB 28, 11:02 AM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:
You do realize that the Dept of Energy is run by a complete partisan idiot? We had eight long years of her as governor. She is a moron, and driving a political, not scientific, agenda.


"Moron" is the first word that comes to my mind when I think of how to describe Donald Trump, but that doesn't stop me from seeing positive in some of the things that happened during Trump's presidency. Here's an example from the U.S. Department of the Interior:

"Trump Administration Awards $6,800,000 to Promote Lower Consumer Costs and Greater Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Territories"
September 17, 2020.
https://www.doi.gov/oia/pre...s-and-greater-energy

There was a focus in that, on SOLAR ENERGY.

It's just something I turned up quickly, as I was thinking of how to respond to the criticism of the current Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm.

olejoedad FEB 28, 03:28 PM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

"Moron" is the first word that comes to my mind when I think of how to describe Donald Trump, but that doesn't stop me from seeing positive in some of the things that happened during Trump's presidency. Here's an example from the U.S. Department of the Interior:

"Trump Administration Awards $6,800,000 to Promote Lower Consumer Costs and Greater Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Territories"
September 17, 2020.
https://www.doi.gov/oia/pre...s-and-greater-energy

There was a focus in that, on SOLAR ENERGY.

It's just something I turned up quickly, as I was thinking of how to respond to the criticism of the current Secretary of Energy, Jennifer Granholm.



Of course you think that, and there is a reason you think that.

You are a victim of the liberal media that fills your brain with falsehoods and mush.