 
     |
| Carbon dioxide hysteria (Page 15/170) |
|
Fitz301
|
JAN 09, 11:33 PM
|
|
The econuts do know that the oil they hate so much comes FROM the ground right?
Where does the fiberglass that's used for the blades of those "renewable energy", bird-killing, monstrosities come from (hint: fiberglass and the resins used with it aren't natural either)?
What do these monstrosities use for lubrication (HINT: rhymes with linoleum)?
Do you econuts have any idea how much oil needs to be pumped up to the turbines everytime they do an "oil change"?
A: EACH WIND TURBINE requires 80 GALLONS every 8-12 months for ALL 341,000 wind turbines worldwide.
What about all the grease (made from petroleum) do they require for lubrication of all the other moving parts?
A: EACH WIND TURBINE requires 60 GALLONS every 8-12 months of grease for ALL 341,000 wind turbines worldwide.
I'll do the math for you 341,000 x 80 = 27,280,000 GALLONS of OIL and 341,000 x 60 = 20,460,000 GALLONS of GREASE every 8-12 months worldwide!
In reality, it isn't that consumers should stop using oil to "save the planet", it because the econuts think the world is running out of oil (which it isn't), and they want to HORDE it for all their screwy "renewable energy" SCAMS!
And unless the parts for these pathetic wastes are machined and put together outdoors during daylight hours, instead of in factories that all require ELECTRICITY, for the machines (which also require grease and oil for lubrication), lighting, computers, etc, which is provided by the other natural resource the ecoterrorists hate which is none other than COAL.
So how are they "renewable energy" again?
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 10, 05:44 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Fitz301:
(See previous message.) |
|
That's the right way to think about it, but I don't think that's a realistic analysis.
"Wind Power Life Cycle Assessment"
Karnie Garabedian; November 29, 2019.
https://storymaps.arcgis.co...4205ae509eabbb83cacc
I don't see anything that defines an institutional affiliations or a relationship to the wind energy industry.
 [This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-10-2023).]
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 15, 12:01 AM
|
|
THE U.S. NATIONAL BLUEPRINT FOR TRANSPORTATION DECARBONIZATION
"A Joint Strategy to Transform Transportation"
U.S. Department of Energy
January 2023
https://www.energy.gov/site...-decarbonization.pdf
It's 88 pages of whoopee for any self-respecting CO2-phobic maniac.
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
JAN 16, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
WonderBoy
|
JAN 16, 10:25 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by MidEngineManiac:
Suck in that lithium !!
https://euroweeklynews.com/...and-couronne-france/
[URL=https://twitter.com/UpwardNewsHQ/status/1615079748119728128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1615079748119728128%7Ctwgr%5E288d30bc3f2c496bf7ceb646d7436989347127cf%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.godlikeproductions.com%2Fforu m1%2F]https://twitter.com/UpwardN...ions.com%2Fforum1%2F[/URL] message5337652%2Fpg1
|
|
It's ok, according to A.I. cabal bot rinselberg (R.I.), it ozone healing smoke. In fact, that fire is actually producing cold flames, not hot at all. ACTUALLY, it's all CGI, it's fake. Nothing to see here. CNN, Vice, Vox, NBC say so.
NWO
2o3o
Ah, push it, Push it real good
|
|
|
|
Fats
|
JAN 17, 12:41 AM
|
|
Anyone pushing the green energy scam needs to listen to this podcast. I'm not a fan of Rogan, I heard about this one from another podcast and found it a good listen.
I already know Rinse won't bother listening because he doesn't care if the media doesn't tell him what to care about.
Joe Rogan Podcast on Spotify
|
|
|
|
rinselberg
|
JAN 17, 04:17 AM
|
|
Google Advanced Search
Find pages with all these words
cobalt
and with this exact word or phrase
new sources
 [This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 01-17-2023).]
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
JAN 17, 08:39 AM
|
|
Rinse, even though I play around with EV toys, they are just that....fire-hazard toys. May as well stick a grenade between your legs, pull the pin then hope you don't drop it.
There are damn good reasons I stick with SLA batteries.
Cost. the set-up on my current build is 36v/22aH for a roughly 50km range at city speeds. Li is $500+. SLA was $190 bucks.
Safety. SLA aren't going to blow up in my living room in the middle of the night for no better reason than the day ends in "Y" (google ebike fire videos and pics. TONS of them out there. One of those Li bombs going off is a daily thing)
Simplicity. SLA dont need perfectly matched chargers or BMS boards to work.
Repairability. If one battery goes bad it's 2 bolts, not major surgery, to replace it.
The ONLY rational reason for using Li is weight. My current set-up weighs 39 pounds, and a comparable Li weighs about 5. Big effin deal, I'm building it for cruising, not racing. I dont care about the extra 2kph or 2 seconds of 0-to time the weight costs me.
(I know, I know....but, but, but...It's lead. It's acid, it's fiberglass. It's bad-bad-bad.  )
<edit>
Right now, there is one and only one advantage to them. They are legally considered bicycles here so there is no need for registration, inspection, insurance, licence or any of the other red-tape crap. Build-and-ride. For the money these cost i could easily have a regular motorcycle. Used Harleys can go cheaper than some of these ebikes. Nevermind rice-grinders.[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 01-17-2023).]
|
|
|
|
Wichita
|
JAN 17, 09:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
MidEngineManiac
|
JAN 17, 10:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|