Carbon dioxide hysteria (Page 134/170)
Wichita DEC 21, 05:33 AM
The trust fund leftists, Greta grifters and rent seeking elites paying their fair share.


[This message has been edited by Wichita (edited 12-21-2023).]

rinselberg DEC 21, 06:36 AM

quote
Originally posted by Wichita:

The trust fund leftists, Greta grifters and rent seeking elites paying their fair share.



This chart cannot be interpreted in any meaningful way without an explanation of how these numbers were determined.

If it came from a report, the report needs to be identified, so that other people (like me) can at least try to make some sense of it.

It would be great if Wichita would provide that kind of documentation for it, but that's not going to happen.

cliffw DEC 21, 07:53 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
The melting of land ice in a warming global climate is what climate researchers factor into their projections of sea level rise.

When a glacier goes from the land into the sea, either by the calving of icebergs or by meltwater flowing into the sea from rivers and streams—that's when sea levels rise.



A discerning person would ask how that glacier developed it's ice.


quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Archimedes principle of buoyancy.



Ah yes. I remember him. We used to drink beer together. He still thinks the world is flat.


quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
It was Wichita who posted this canard without adding any words of his own, as if he were the legendary Oracle of Delphi, majestically revealing "Truth" to an awestruck audience—and in so doing, unwittingly revealing himself as the climate science equivalent of The Emperor Without Any Clothes.



Of course he is not the Oracle of Delphi of Global Warming. You are.


82-T/A [At Work] DEC 21, 07:56 AM

quote
Originally posted by Raydar:


WAIT! HOLY CRAP!!
Speaking of "buttered bread" and "shills".
Not to mention the hypocrisy.

https://www.caclubindia.com...-thunberg-net-worth/

(Unfortunately, the article seems to not allow copying of its text. Here are screen grabs from that article.)





I don't know if that website is very accurate. I remember looking up two people whom I knew personally (not like I hang out with them, but I know them), and what was on there was totally incorrect and really exaggerated. I know she comes from a fairly well-off family, but I would just be suspect of that website... it seems a bit outrageous.
cliffw DEC 21, 07:57 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
This chart cannot be interpreted in any meaningful way without an explanation of how these numbers were determined.



Joe six pack does not own a private CO2 spewing jet, Like our Global Warming Czar John Kerry.
rinselberg DEC 21, 12:27 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Joe six pack does not own a private CO2 spewing jet, Like our Global Warming Czar John Kerry.


Taking that data plot from Wichita at face value, the only thing it represents is Emissions. It's an attribution of the amount of Greenhouse Gas Emissions per human individual, broken out by Income Level. But what are the implications?

How do the funding and other resources that support ongoing Climate Mitigation and Climate Adaptation efforts shape up, and how could that be attributed on a per human individual basis, broken out in a similar way by Income Level?

Are the "big Emitters" also the "big Donors", in terms of who is paying for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation efforts that are part of (for example) the Inflation Reduction Act? How do the federal and state tax revenues and other resources that support Climate Mitigation and Adaptation efforts line up, when broken out in this same way by Income Groups? For the United States and for other countries and the entire world?

This is like so many of Wichita's other "manifestations" on this forum: It's only "part of the story."

Wichita's data plot may be a powerful argument that the U.S. and other countries should be moving farther towards the "Left" in terms of governance and economics. (Try to imagine Wichita's frowning face as he reads this sentence, if he were to read this sentence.)

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 12-21-2023).]

cliffw DEC 22, 09:11 AM

quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
How do the funding and other resources that support ongoing Climate Mitigation and Climate Adaptation efforts shape up, and how could that be attributed on a per human individual basis, broken out in a similar way by Income Level?



Funding ? Is that code for theft by Global Warming Cultists ?

You act like mitigation is needed, .
ray b DEC 22, 10:25 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Funding ? Is that code for theft by Global Warming Cultists ?

You act like mitigation is needed, .



and you do NOT???????????????

you are the problem not the solution to any thing

just an other RUMPER
cliffw DEC 22, 11:14 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
Funding ? Is that code for theft by Global Warming Cultists ?

You act like mitigation is needed, .




quote
Originally posted by ray b:
... and you do NOT???????????????



No ray b, I do not think it is needed. The world will not end in 100 years, no matter what we do.


quote
Originally posted by ray b:
you are the problem not the solution to any thing



There is no problem.

Out of curiosity, what are you doing to mitigate this farce

ray b DEC 22, 12:10 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


There is no problem.

Out of curiosity, what are you doing to mitigate this farce



WE WENT OFF GRID IN 73
moved on a sail boat at anchor
traded for a 47 ft boat
20 years off grid windmills and 12v

current south dade home power by nukes [turkey point]
bikes and sailboats