TRUMP 2024 (Page 10/59)
82-T/A [At Work] JAN 14, 07:36 PM

quote
Originally posted by theBDub:

No offense taken… I already said up front I am no expert. But I highly doubt that those that are experts are pursing this if it’s all bullshit, even if someone on a Fiero forum who doesn’t actively practice law thinks it is.



I think (in my opinion) you're too trusting of people's intentions. You legitimately think the DOJ is acting purely A-political here. It seems you cannot believe that people would do things for the sole benefit of politics. We've done MUCH worse in politics over the generations... this pales in comparison to some of them... like William Burr shooting his opponent, and then starting a militia to take over the country, only to be foiled by the state of New Jersey (or wherever it was).
theBDub JAN 14, 07:51 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:


I think (in my opinion) you're too trusting of people's intentions. You legitimately think the DOJ is acting purely A-political here. It seems you cannot believe that people would do things for the sole benefit of politics. We've done MUCH worse in politics over the generations... this pales in comparison to some of them... like William Burr shooting his opponent, and then starting a militia to take over the country, only to be foiled by the state of New Jersey (or wherever it was).



I am generally a trusting person, no argument there. But we have recorded evidence of Trump’s actions, we all saw and/or heard him attempting to overrule the outcome of the vote. The trust there is gone.
ray b JAN 14, 09:11 PM
just listen to the orange traitor

who had the sheep chant ''LOCK HER UP''

THEN CLAIMS
''TO USE THE LAWS IS SO UNFAIR'' when he broke them

now said '' will use the laws on them ''
first day back

REALLY ?
olejoedad JAN 15, 08:11 AM

quote
Originally posted by ray b:

just listen to the orange traitor

who had the sheep chant ''LOCK HER UP''

THEN CLAIMS
''TO USE THE LAWS IS SO UNFAIR'' when he broke them

now said '' will use the laws on them ''
first day back

REALLY ?



Just for you, rayb.....

Perhaps factual information would reduce your angst

From your friend, VDH.

https://amgreatness.com/202...-running-out-of-gas/
williegoat JAN 15, 12:07 PM
I decided about a week ago to let the news over the next few months speak for itself.

Since then, Hunter and his hoods did a flash mob in congress, Fani and her boy toy were exposed and now Gonzolo Lira has died in prison.

It is Monday, what will this week hold? Stay tuned. No, not like Timothy. He's dead.

Remember what Polonius told us.

"Just the opinion of an old retired gearjammer"
82-T/A [At Work] JAN 15, 12:18 PM

quote
Originally posted by theBDub:
I am generally a trusting person, no argument there. But we have recorded evidence of Trump’s actions, we all saw and/or heard him attempting to overrule the outcome of the vote. The trust there is gone.



What exactly are you talking about? There is nothing illegal about him asking Pence to not certify the elections.

Is there something else you're referring to?


Among other things, I reference this... the effective subversive stealing of the elections through the process that Democrats normally do... change the rules, and do it until the courts tell them it's illegal... all while knowing that it's illegal, but "waiting out the clock."


- - -


Democrats drastically violated election laws in every state they possibly could. In all of the major swing states, Democrats got into the elections departments and... using COVID-19 as an excuse, wantonly violated state election laws to perform the following:

- Mass mail-in voting... in some cases, just sending out a ballot to literally everyone who was registered to vote.
- Ballot harvesting, as in... allowing people to go door to door and collect ballots on behalf of the political party.
- Ballot drop-boxes... allowing people from anywhere to be able to deliver ballots, without any verification.
- Waiving registration deadlines
- Waiving signature verification
- Waiving proof of identity verification


This allowed rampant and mass voting violations. I've gone through this whole thing before, and people say... "show me the proof, you have no proof!!!" so here it is... state Supreme Courts literally ruling that Democrats violated and illegally changed the state's election laws without the consent of the legislature. Go ahead, click the links:

Michigan:
- https://www.washingtonexami...-law-absentee-ballot
- https://www.detroitnews.com...-invalid/4699927001/
- https://trendingpolitics.co...e-ballot-order-knab/

Pennsylvania:
- https://www.cbsnews.com/pit...voting-law-decision/
- https://thefederalist.com/2...were-broken-in-2020/

Wisconsin:
- https://www.reuters.com/wor...lections-2022-07-08/
- https://www.breitbart.com/p...s-violate-state-law/

Georgia:
- https://www.gpb.org/news/20...ke-da-race-will-move
- https://thefederalist.com/2...ection-laws-in-2020/


There have been some other recent court rulings, but these are really the only ones I remember off hand. I can't remember the other states. I think maybe North Carolina, and a few others...
BingB JAN 15, 12:28 PM

quote
Originally posted by 82-T/A [At Work]:
But it's clear to me that the intent and goal of all of this was well coordinated, and that makes it "fraud" in my eyes....


The rules were the same for both sides. There is nothing fraudulent about getting more people to vote.

ray b JAN 15, 12:41 PM

quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


Just for you, rayb.....

Perhaps factual information would reduce your angst

From your friend, VDH.

https://amgreatness.com/202...-running-out-of-gas/



DO YOU EVER LINK TO A SITE

that is not so rightwing as to be silly ?

have ads even sillier likely dangerous quack cures ect

mr pillow

rump begging

fired fox fanatics

or all that and more


btw no thanks
williegoat JAN 15, 12:41 PM
In Maricopa county, on the weekend before election day, they set up "emergency polling places" in specific neighborhoods, then went door to door in those neighborhoods to let specific people know.

On election day, precincts in different, specific neighborhoods all ran out of ink.

In the weeks following the election, they continued to allow car loads of "newly discovered" ballots to be counted.

Maricopa county was stolen. That is a fact. I don't care what anyone else wants to believe.

williegoat JAN 15, 12:45 PM
Yes, they did a recount. They counted the same ballots again. Why would anyone expect the count to be different?