 
     |
| Colorado (Page 10/11) |
|
BingB
|
JAN 02, 09:22 PM
|
|
I have no idea if this is legal or not, but if Trump does not get elected because he is removed from the ballot I am afraid of what some of his more extreme followers will do. I would much rather see Nikki Haley (or some other moderate) get the nomination.
If it is Biden v Trump then I am not voting.
|
|
|
|
randye
|
JAN 02, 09:43 PM
|
|
It is difficult, if not impossible, to honestly argue against the veracity and accuracy of VDH.
For those two reasons alone the Leftards will hate him.
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JAN 03, 09:56 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by BingB:
I have no idea if this is legal or not, but if Trump does not get elected because he is removed from the ballot I am afraid of what some of his more extreme followers will do. I would much rather see Nikki Haley (or some other moderate) get the nomination.
If it is Biden v Trump then I am not voting.
|
|
What do envision happening in a scenario where Trump is not allowed to run, or is handicapped by omission from the ballot in a few states?
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JAN 03, 05:09 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by randye:
It is difficult, if not impossible, to honestly argue against the veracity and accuracy of VDH.
For those two reasons alone the Leftards will hate him.
|
|
It is difficult, if not impossible, to honestly argue that Hillary Clinton saying the 2016 election was rigged is anything like Trump hacking into voting records, setting up panels of fraudulent delegates, pressuring the Georgia Sec of Sate to falsify election returns, or tell an angry mob that Mike Pence could nullify the election if he wanted and that if he didn't then they have to "fight like hell or else they won't have a country anymore"[This message has been edited by BingB (edited 01-03-2024).]
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JAN 03, 05:16 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
What do envision happening in a scenario where Trump is not allowed to run, or is handicapped by omission from the ballot in a few states? |
|
First of all I don't think all Trump supporters are violent extremists, but we already got a taste of what the radical ones did last time he claimed he was cheated. And since they see the January 6 insurrection as a failure they will probably go bigger the next time.
I am already hearing commensts about how "the founding fathers would already be shooting". So I assume many more people will die.
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
JAN 03, 05:25 PM
|
|
|
I don't think they have enough FBI agents and informants to do anything bigger than they did last time.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JAN 03, 05:32 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jdv:
I don't think they have enough FBI agents and informants to do anything bigger than they did last time. |
|
What does this mean? So far about 400 convicted, but not one of them FBI.
A lot of these defendants had top level defense attorneys. You know why none of them were acquitted because the FBI was to blame? Because there is no legitimate evidence to prove anything like that. It is easy to talk crazy conspiracy theories on rigth-wing media where everyone believes whatever they hear, but it is impossible to do something like that in a courtroom where legitimate evidence is required.
|
|
|
|
jdv
|
JAN 03, 06:09 PM
|
|
|
That was a staged event. A set up. The only ones that should be charged are the ones that broke in and Micheal Byrd. If you hold someone long enough without bail they will cop a plea. Your an attorney you should know this. If this is not the case then why did congress hide the videos from "we the people" [This message has been edited by jdv (edited 01-03-2024).]
|
|
|
|
olejoedad
|
JAN 03, 06:35 PM
|
|
Methinks there are some on this Forum should not take what the J6 Select Committee found as gospel.
There have been other investigations by independent journalists, some more biased than others (and arguably less bias than the J6 investigation), that paint a different picture.
|
|
|
|
BingB
|
JAN 03, 11:01 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by jdv:
That was a staged event. A set up.
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by olejoedad:
Methinks there are some on this Forum should not take what the J6 Select Committee found as gospel.
There have been other investigations by independent journalists, some more biased than others (and arguably less bias than the J6 investigation), that paint a different picture. |
|
Sorry guys but I just can't believe that 400 people with lawyers, some of them very high profile, and none of them presented any of this so-called evidence to the courts.
I don't see how you can believe that is possible. Why wouldn't any of these defendants, some of them facing 10 to 20 years in prison, present this evidence in their defense?
I might not trust the theatrics of a Congressional Committee, but I sure trust the real world court system. It is easy to spew BS on the TV or internet, but BS doesn't fly in court. Just like all the people on the internet and TV claiming they had "proof" that the 2020 election was fixed, but it was all just BS that would not stand up in court.
And you can't cry "bias" in a court where both sides get to equally present their evidence to an unbiased jury that both sides select.
|
|
|
