 
     |
| The New and Improved Quarter Mile List (Page 2/76) |
|
AkursedX
|
MAY 02, 11:45 AM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
AkursedX and Matt Hawkins: I don't see any timeslips or videos.
|
|
Here:
And Matt's is legitimate. I witnessed it along with Darkhorizon.
|
|
|
|
Blacktree
|
MAY 02, 12:00 PM
|
|
Sorry, but the rule still stands.
| quote | | First of all, you must offer proof of your claim. A copy of the timeslip, or a photo/video of the run (with your car and the display board clearly visible), are both acceptable forms of proof. But "so-and-so saw it and can vouch for it" or "I raced a 12-second Mustang on the street and kept up with him" is not. |
|
If he still has his timeslip, scan it and I'll add him to the list.
|
|
|
|
MstangsBware
|
MAY 02, 04:56 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
Sorry, but the rule still stands.
If he still has his timeslip, scan it and I'll add him to the list. |
|
If that is the rule them you need to go thru the old 1/4 mile Thread and see who on the list posted there time slip. If it is not posted then they need to be removed from the list until a slip is posted.
I will hook up my scanner later if I get around to it and scan my last slip from my 12.0 @111 MPH.
|
|
|
|
darkhorizon
|
MAY 02, 05:03 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
Are you on the right or the left? |
|
heh what do you think  a 2.3 60' with a supercharged fiero?
Right side, 12.89 @ 106
Matts was legit, I was in the other lane on that run. I will poke around for the slip, I think I burned most of my non 12's though.
|
|
|
|
Billybo455
|
MAY 02, 05:11 PM
|
|
i'm 4662.
|
|
|
|
AkursedX
|
MAY 02, 06:07 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
Sorry, but the rule still stands.
If he still has his timeslip, scan it and I'll add him to the list. |
|
I went through the old 1/4 mile thread and here's a list (a rather small list) of all of the timeslips or videos I was able to find on the thread or by clicking on some links in sigs or posts:
Lfiero67-11.962@113.84
Banditbalz-14.79@91.4
Troy Ritchie-11.52@120.96
Darth Fiero-12.262@113.05
1FST2M6-14.18@94.95
Her86GT-12.51@107.87
FieroGTguy-13.158@102.24
lowfierogt-12.93@104.5
Darth Fiero-14.16@97.7 3.4DOHC
The Adjuster-14.56@92.3
x-thumpr-x-14.38@91.1
lildevil-11.74@115
Don Kraus-11.323@116.40
scrabblegod-13.89@98.6
Orief-12.34@111.69
Matt Hawkins-12.07@116.86
DrCPU-13.81@103.96
Jncomutt-13.21@109
xxsportscar-15.76@84.76
dizmon_85GT-13.039@100.25
blkcofy-12.961@105.53
fieromadman-13.684@102.45
I'm assuming Soulcrusher probably got PM's and e-mails of timeslips for the other times? I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Blacktree
|
MAY 02, 06:13 PM
|
|
I was actually thinking of weeding out all the entries without proof. But like you mentioned, Soulcrusher may have received PM's or emails with that proof. This is why I ask everyone to post your proof in this thread. So if someone else ends up taking over the list, there will be no guesswork.
I guess we're just going to have to "grandfather in" the existing entries. I'm not too thrilled about doing that. But trying to get validation on each one would be a HUGE task. The only other workable alternative would be to start a new list from scratch. I have no problem with that. After all, the old list isn't going anywhere. Any thoughts or opinions?  [This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 05-02-2008).]
|
|
|
|
Billybo455
|
MAY 02, 06:16 PM
|
|
|
oh yeah 3800scII/built 4t65hd lotsa mods :P
|
|
|
|
fierosound
|
MAY 02, 07:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
AkursedX
|
MAY 02, 08:05 PM
|
|
| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
I was actually thinking of weeding out all the entries without proof. But like you mentioned, Soulcrusher may have received PM's or emails with that proof. This is why I ask everyone to post your proof in this thread. So if someone else ends up taking over the list, there will be no guesswork.
I guess we're just going to have to "grandfather in" the existing entries. I'm not too thrilled about doing that. But trying to get validation on each one would be a HUGE task. The only other workable alternative would be to start a new list from scratch. I have no problem with that. After all, the old list isn't going anywhere. Any thoughts or opinions?
|
|
How about assigning colors to verified and unverified times? Or making two seperate lists of verified and unverified times with a clause that you are not accepting anymore unverified times?
I think that's a reasonable solution.
|
|
|
