Academics' "own little world" seems a lot more in touch with reality than yours, if your debate performance in this thread is any indication.
Just because you disagree with me? Sorry, Marvin, my debate performance in the Global Warming thread has been just fine, thank you. You allow your personal bias to get in the way of your judgement. I simply don't care to respond to a person who is a pedantic troll.
Just because you disagree with me? Sorry, Marvin, my debate performance in the Global Warming thread has been just fine, thank you. You allow your personal bias to get in the way of your judgement. I simply don't care to respond to a person who is a pedantic troll. [emphasis added]
I appreciate the sentiment, but ???WTF??? You seem confused. This isn't your "Only post in this thread when you're drunk" thread.
[This message has been edited by Marvin McInnis (edited 01-08-2013).]
Just because you disagree with me? Sorry, Marvin, my debate performance in the Global Warming thread has been just fine, thank you. You allow your personal bias to get in the way of your judgement. I simply don't care to respond to a person who is a pedantic troll.
Just to clarify...while flattered, I am not Marvin.
quote
He EDITED IT after I said that, you moron.
If you had clicked on the link it shows a pie chart showing that they did in fact donate a lot more to Republican candidates.
Does $20,701 + $18,401 = $1,816,475? Perhaps jumping to conclusions is, once again, a poor choice.
He EDITED IT after I said that, you moron. Here is what he originally posted, and what I responded to:
Now, about endorsing political candidates, State Farm gave $1,816,475 to candidates last year: $20,701 to Barack Obama $18, 401 to Mitt Romney.
I love that you take the time to add the extra keystrokes to insult him! Totally unneeded, but you always go above and beyond, and why not? It's in the trash anyways, and makes for entertaining material to read during down time at work.