Has anybody checked the Shillary / Billary bank accounts ?
Funny thing. Ukraine was the biggest donator to the Clinton sham Foundation.
quote
The $30 million in revenue in 2018 is shrunk from the near-$250 million the foundation received in 2009 when Hillary Clinton became secretary of state.
The foundation brought in $62.9 million as recently as 2016, when Clinton was running for president.
[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 11-22-2019).]
Ukraine is at the top of that bar graph from the Wall Street Journal (2015), but it's because of exactly one Ukrainian donor, a "Victor Pinchuk," who has made contributions to the Clinton Fund that approached or exceeded $10 million dollars. It's not money that came in as donations from any of the presidents or parliaments that held governance in Ukraine during those years, and it's not money that has a pattern to it that can be read as an obvious signature of "Pay For Play,"--aside from maybe Victor Pinchuk himself, who has (had?) his own Victor Pinchuk Foundation.
Time to start ransacking the Internet for references to Victor Pinchuk? Or better to dwell on that ever recurring question, "How many Pins could a Pinchuk 'chuk', if a Pinchuk could 'chuk' Pins?"
Ukraine is at the top of that bar graph from the Wall Street Journal (2015), but it's because of exactly one Ukrainian donor, a "Victor Pinchuk," who has made contributions to the Clinton Fund that approached or exceeded $10 million dollars. It's not money that came in as donations from any of the presidents or parliaments that held governance in Ukraine during those years, and it's not money that has a pattern to it that can be read as an obvious signature of "Pay For Play,"--aside from maybe Victor Pinchuk himself, who has (had?) his own Victor Pinchuk Foundation.
Time to start ransacking the Internet for references to Victor Pinchuk? Or better to dwell on that ever recurring question, "How many Pins could a Pinchuk 'chuk', if a Pinchuk could 'chuk' Pins?"
"If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.
The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family, (his crazy Leftist daughter, Wallis), took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical colleague Barack Obama.
How is factcheck.org associated with these people?
Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC.
Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama. "
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-23-2019).]
"If you look behind the scenes at these phony "fact check" sites, you find that they are funded by organizations with political biases. You must always ask yourself. Who is writing about this so-called "truth." Who funds the site and pays their expenses. What are the origins and history of the funders and who are they associated with. In the case of factcheck.org they receive their funding from the liberal Annenberg Foundation.
The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical colleague Barack Obama.
How is factcheck.org associated with these people?
Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC.
Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org. The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama. " Click to show
The valued member above you has no friggin' idea what you just wrote. But hey, TANG!
Simple Jack
[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 11-23-2019).]
Originally posted by rinselberg: Ukraine is at the top of that bar graph from the Wall Street Journal (2015), but it's because of exactly one Ukrainian donor, a "Victor Pinchuk," who has made contributions to the Clinton Fund that approached or exceeded $10 million dollars. It's not money that came in as donations from any of the presidents or parliaments that held governance in Ukraine during those years,
FactCheck(.org) is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center.
Really ? Fact Check, ? Never did I say that the sanctioned Ukranian government goobers were the ones donating. Of course they were not.
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg: ... it's because of exactly one Ukrainian donor, a "Victor Pinchuk," who has made contributions to the Clinton Fund that approached or exceeded $10 million dollars.
Originally posted by rinselberg: ... Victor Pinchuk himself, who has (had?) his own Victor Pinchuk Foundation.
Mmm, who doesn't like the smell of freshed money laundering ? Why would he donate to another Foundation ? Have you even searchedfor how much money the Clinton Foundation donated to the Victor Pinchuk Foundation. Go ahead, take a look. We will wait .
Yeah, it seems that everyone in Ukraine is accusing and investigating everyone else right now. The place is so damned rife with corruption, you can't tell the players even with a program.
The Clinton Foundation has always been a secret (not so much now) way to boost the Clintons own private bank accounts. Of course Hillary would never get prosecuted for fraud with it though. Just get anyone with knowledge assassinated.
Well, I really dunno about all this. I don't pretend to see as many answers as I see questions.
I just found this...
"Who is Victor Pinchuk? Mueller investigating Ukrainian billionaire's $150,000 payment to Trump Foundation."
quote
Victor Pinchuk is the Ukrainian billionaire who paid Donald Trump's foundation $150,000 for an appearance by video link at a 2015 conference in Kiev.
That payment was unearthed in a subpoena of the Trump Organization by the Mueller investigation, reported The New York Times. It is one of a number of foreign payments made to Trump and his associates under the microscope.
<SNIP>
In a statement to the New York Times, the Victor Pinchuk Foundation said it approached Trump and other world leaders to help "promote strengthened and enduring ties between Ukraine and the West."
It also said Trump requested the donation to his own foundation and that at the time, he had not secured the Republican nomination for president so "it was by no means assured that Mr. Trump would be the Republican nominee in 2016."
It would be interesting to know (at some point) whether any of the Referrals that were referred by the Mueller team to other jurisdictions for further investigation are connected in any significant way to the currently ongoing investigation(s) of Rudy Giuliani by the U.S. Southern District of New York or "SDNY."
The Mueller investigation has ended. Long live the Mueller investigation.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-26-2019).]
Well, I really dunno about all this. I don't pretend to see as many answers as I see questions.
I just found this...
"Who is Victor Pinchuk? Mueller investigating Ukrainian billionaire's $150,000 payment to Trump Foundation." Shane Croucher for Newsweek; April 10, 2018. https://www.newsweek.com/wh...50000-payment-878431
It would be interesting to know (at some point) whether any of the Referrals that were referred by the Mueller team to other jurisdictions for further investigation are connected in any significant way to the currently ongoing investigation(s) of Rudy Giuliani by the U.S. Southern District of New York or "SDNY."
The Mueller investigation has ended. Long live the Mueller investigation.
Hmmm, does this investigating of a donation to Trump's foundation, but no questions into the Clinton Foundation set of any train of thought for you?
Originally posted by rinselberg: It would be interesting to know (at some point) whether any of the Referrals that were referred by the Mueller team to other jurisdictions for further investigation are connected in any significant way to the currently ongoing investigation(s) of Rudy Giuliani by the U.S. Southern District of New York or "SDNY."
The Mueller investigation has ended. Long live the Mueller investigation.
If the New York Times goes front page tomorrow with "Newly discovered banking records reveal that Hunter Biden enriched himself and his friends by embezzling over $1 Billion from Ukraine's energy sector" and "Newly revealed White House emails prove that President Trump knew all about it before his July 25 telephone conversation with Ukraine's newly elected President" it wouldn't exonerate President Trump for his Shakedown Scheme. He'd still be a VIP (Very Impeachable President) in my estimation.
As far as the Clinton Foundation "bla bla bla," has anything been stopping the U.S. Department of Justice from "having at it" since POTUS changed from Barack Hussein Obama (II) to Donald John Trump? Where was the U.S. House of Representatives on this, before the 2018 midterms, when the Republicans had a majority? Where has the Senate been, where the Republicans have had and still have a majority?
Maybe the Clinton(s) are the criminal geniuses of the modern era. So... anyone and everyone else is entitled to a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card, because the Clinton(s) got away with a lot of shat? Sounds like a Public Policy Prescription of "Dial 'A' for Anarchy" to me.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-26-2019).]
He'd still be a VIP (Very Impeachable President) in my estimation.
Imagine my surprise.
quote
As far as the Clinton Foundation "bla bla bla," has anything been stopping the U.S. Department of Justice from "having at it" since POTUS changed from Barack Hussein Obama (II) to Donald John Trump?
Yeah, because the left would never accuse Trump of using the power his office to investigate a political rival.
quote
Maybe the Clinton(s) are the criminal geniuses of the modern era. So... anyone and everyone else is entitled to a "Get Out Of Jail Free" card, because the Clinton(s) got away with a lot of shat? Sounds like a Public Policy Prescription of "Dial 'A' for Anarchy" to me.
I think maybe you are starting to get it. Well, except for the "genius" part. The only smart thing Hillary ever did was hook up with Bill.
?
.
