Click here to visit the donation page | View all sponsors
  Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  The Trump Impeachment Proceedings (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
The Trump Impeachment Proceedings by blackrams
Started on: 11-13-2019 02:37 PM
Replies: 106 (1512 views)
Last post by: Tony Kania on 12-05-2019 08:46 PM
cliffw
Member

Posts: 32442
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 285
Rate this member

Report this Post11-24-2019 11:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwClick Here to Email cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
.

[This message has been edited by cliffw (edited 11-24-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post11-24-2019 11:33 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:


...

How do you expect any of that you typed in RED to be taken seriously if you continually regress to 4th grade antics?

P.S. Almost every “talking point” you typed in red is complete horse-sh!t.
I mean, you know that, right?


...



Prove it? You have been asked twice.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member

Posts: 32442
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 285
Rate this member

Report this Post11-24-2019 01:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwClick Here to Email cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
EDIT

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Picking up on that last remark, about Obama vs Trump, and Obama's resistance against the provision of battlefield weapons for the Ukraine, it would seem relevant to consider that Obama reached the end of his second term. What might Obama have decided if he were still in office, in response to changing conditions or the persistence of the conflict between the Ukraine and Russian-backed insurgents?


As he told his buddy Vlad, he had more flexibility after he won his second term.

Any more questions ?

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
What might Hillary Clinton have decided (about Ukraine,) if she had become POTUS..?


Kept milking the money ?

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Not such a simple or obvious comparison.


To some, yes, it is harder.
IP: Logged
williegoat
Member

Posts: 11937
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 89
Rate this member

Report this Post11-24-2019 01:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageClick Here to Email williegoatSend a Private Message to williegoatReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

What might Hillary Clinton have decided (about Ukraine,) if she had become POTUS..?

If Hillary had stolen been elected to the Presidency, we would not be hearing much at all about Ukraine, because, well, you know, some things are better kept in the family. And that's none of your business, anyway.

What we would be hearing about is how we all need to sacrifice a little more because we have been living high on the hog for far too long, as more and more people loose their jobs and join the rolls of public assistance. The mean old Republicans would rather see them starve, though. But don't you worry your poor deplorable little head, she's got you covered and at a price that everyone can afford: Your immortal soul.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2019 10:30 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member

Posts: 8203
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 112
Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2019 12:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageClick Here to Email rinselbergSend a Private Message to rinselbergReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

Federal District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia... "DC"

 
quote
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled late Monday that former White House counsel Don McGahn must obey a subpoena for his testimony issued by the House Judiciary Committee.

Federal District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson said McGahn must appear before Congress but retains the ability to "invoke executive privilege where appropriate" during his appearance.

"It is clear to this Court for the reasons explained above that, with respect to senior-level presidential aides, absolute immunity from compelled congressional process simply does not exist," Jackson said in her ruling.

"Presidents are not kings," she added.

That's the beginning of a small to middling size report from Pete Williams, for NBC News; November 25, 2019.
https://www.nbcnews.com/pol...ena-testify-n1090566

My sources are describing it as interesting and important news, but not something that is going to put points on the scoreboard for either team as the Impeachment Game Clock ticks down to the end of 2019. So, not a "game changer."




ESPN's Booger McFarland has the update

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-26-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2019 01:23 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Love my morning Cofeve!
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member

Posts: 32442
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 285
Rate this member

Report this Post11-26-2019 03:15 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwClick Here to Email cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
How honorable do you find it for a man to criticize a woman’s looks, or apply derogatory nicknames to her?
You don’t have to like her, but I’m quite sure based on your age you were taught better than that when it comes to women.


My gosh man, are you that soft ? I was taught better than that. If a woman acts like a man, if she insists on being treated like a man, equal to a man. I should treat them as a man.
My gosh. Are you a man ? If Shillary can call me a sexist, a deplorable, irredeemable, a homo phobe, and much worse, lines are drawn.
I am a honorable man. I am not trying to put a woman in 'her' place, I am trying to honer her and put her in the place she wants to be, .

I am an equal opportunity honorable man. How 'bout these guys ?








 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
How do you expect any of that you typed in RED to be taken seriously if you continually regress to 4th grade antics?


Your not smarter than a forth grader !

 
quote
Originally posted by Threedog:
The equivalent of a schoolgirl plugging her ears and scream "nanananananana".


Yet what does Threedog want ? His first sentence in this quote ...

 
quote
Originally posted by Threedog:
I disappear because people here want to hurl insults and ignore whatever I write instead of actually discuss the facts of what is going on.


I did not hurl insults. I offered for discussion every point he brought up. What did I do wrong ? I even gave him a few days to think about it.
Did my red type trigger him ? Did he run to his safe space ?

 
quote
Originally posted by Threedog:
I disappear because people here want to hurl insults and ignore whatever I write instead of actually discuss the facts of what is going on.


 
quote
Originally posted by Boondawg:
P.S. Almost every “talking point” you typed in red is complete horse-sh!t.
I mean, you know that, right?


You were invited to refute them, TWICE ! I should refer to your horsezhit opinion, just because you can not handle the truth ?

@ Threedog ...
I have been in touch with Kania. He has no safe spaces available and you better reserve your cry closets before Nov 2020. 1/2 price off for PFF T/OT members but time is running out.

IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member

Posts: 8203
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 112
Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2019 01:40 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageClick Here to Email rinselbergSend a Private Message to rinselbergReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
These are just a couple of impeachment-related trifles or hors d'oeuvres. Although the first one that I am laying out here has a bit more substance to it. It starts with a brief and fairly gentle skewering of Trump White House fixture Kellyanne Conway, but quickly segues to the ruminations of Ezra Klein, who articulates the idea that the possibility of Impeachment has become permeated with a trepidation or reluctance that actually represents a modern departure from the mindset of the Founding Fathers.

"Ezra Klein On Historic Impeachment [Inquiry] Vote"
MSNBC on YouTube; video content 6 minutes; air date October 31, 2019.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u78bCypo21k


What do "we" want from an Impeachment-related podcast? New Yorker Magazine staff writer Sarah Larson shared her thoughts in a page-long column on "The Art of the Impeachment Podcast" from November 21.
https://www.newyorker.com/c...-impeachment-podcast


CLICK FOR FULL SIZE
This caption is carefully color-coordinated with his pocket handkerchief.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 11-27-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2019 04:10 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member

Posts: 49546
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 553
Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2019 05:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonClick Here to Email rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
dreadlocks are for them not to have to wash their hair. Theyre nasty. I was behind a woman in line to pick up my laundry a while back and something just caught my attention...there were dozens of little bugs crawling all over her head. I about puked on the spot.
IP: Logged
randye
Member

Posts: 9627
From: New Port Richey, Florida
Registered: Mar 2006


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 187
Rate this member

Report this Post11-27-2019 08:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for randyeClick Here to visit randye's HomePageClick Here to Email randyeSend a Private Message to randyeReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
MILTON VINDMAN




"I was told that I could keep my red stapler if I testified."

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-27-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post11-29-2019 11:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member

Posts: 8203
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 112
Rate this member

Report this Post12-03-2019 05:51 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageClick Here to Email rinselbergSend a Private Message to rinselbergReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post


Does President Trump have a "perfect" Caller Rating? Here's what the Truth-O-Meter FactCheck process reveals about the Chief Executive's calling record, going back to January 1, 2019.

Telephone calls to foreign heads of state...

Attempted 37, Completed 33, Resulted in 10 or more minutes of conversation 19, Intercepted by one or more foreign intelligence services 18, Quae pro quibus (quid pro quos) 6, Conformed to established national security protocols 16, Call transcript or parts of conversation leaked to news media 9, Average conversation per attempt 7.5 minutes, Caller Power Ranking (CPR) among NATO Heads of State of "3" (behind Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron.)

Caller Rating ("do the math") of 104.9

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 12-03-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post12-03-2019 09:15 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Hanging on to every nut hair they do. Clutching them like an embroidered change purse. Liberals, the soft meat.
IP: Logged
cliffw
Member

Posts: 32442
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 285
Rate this member

Report this Post12-04-2019 04:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwClick Here to Email cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Did you go to school today ?

What is the different between a dead skunk in the middle of the road and a dead lawyer in the middle of the road ?
A dead skunk has skid marks in front of it.

Today, in the impeachment follies, the Dumbs introduced three Constitutional scholars, and allowed the republicans to introduce one.

The Dumbs :
Noah Feldman, who had a podcast about impeaching Trump three months after his election.
He is an esteemed professor of the University of MSNBCHarvard University.

Michael Gerhar, a renowned professor of CNN Univerity UNC.

Pamala Karlan, a legend in the Dumb's mind from the University of NBC Sheeple Herders Standard University.

The Dumbs think someone needs an education of what is impeachable. I question if they are trying to sway Congressional representatives or the voting public, who's opinion has not been swayed one bit since the farce started. As well as any republican representatives.

The Republicans introduced Professor Jonathon Turley, of George Washington University.

Turley spoke open minded while the others seemed rabid about "guilty", speaking of the founding fathers intentions like they hung out with them everyday. To the point of suggesting that they thought the Constitution was an evolving document (where have we heard that before). Using today's definitions in place of the ones in existence when they crafted the Constitution.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 10:26 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member

Posts: 13039
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 181
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 10:38 AM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadClick Here to Email olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It should be noted that the Republican 'witness', Jonathan Turley, is a Liberal Democrat, and did not vote for President Trump.
He was also the only unbiased, most thoughtful and most logical of the four lawyers that testified.
He was a credit to the profession of law.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 10:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It should also be noted that this will be the next level of stupidity.



Look around at your friends, family, and neighbors. America is much better off than what "chicken little" tells us.


Anyone that listens can see here that Pelosi has changed her mannerism. "Whobody knows?"

[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 12-05-2019).]

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member

Posts: 11937
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 89
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 11:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageClick Here to Email williegoatSend a Private Message to williegoatReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
The swamp dwellers are ramping up the rhetoric in an effort to create a cacophony of chaos sufficient to drown out the impending release of the IG report. Pay close attention, at the beginning of next week, not only to what is being reported, but how it is being reported. Don’t be fooled by the surface scum. You will have to dig through the mud.

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 12-05-2019).]

IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member

Posts: 8203
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 112
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 12:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageClick Here to Email rinselbergSend a Private Message to rinselbergReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
"Legislate, Investigate, Litigate."

Y'all can think of her as LIL' Nancy.


If you saw her this morning, less than an hour ago (I think) you likely heard her say that.

"Mitch" said just the other day that it is inconceivable that the Senate will arrive at the Two Thirds of all voting members to remove him from office.

I'm just calling it a "long shot."

I think it's a lead (Pb) pipe cinch that the House will approve Articles of Impeachment on a very sharply divided partisan or D vs R kind of vote. There could be a few "D"s in the House that will not approve the Articles. Not a single "R" will approve the Articles. (Justin Amash, not an "R" anymore. I have to think he will vote to approve the Articles.)

My sources have said that Mitch McConnell is not likely to try to avoid an IT (impeachment trial) in the Senate with a motion to dismiss, but that even if he tried it, he wouldn't have the simple majority vote that would be required. The motion would be opposed by almost every Senator with a "D", and there would be enough "R"s that would prefer to have an IT. Even if they expect to conduct themselves in such a way that not one of the Articles or charges (indictments, in effect) will receive the Two Thirds ...

Using "IT"... more polite than using that "dirty I-word." If you can believe that. I'm not sure I can believe that. OK, it's a pun.

Y'all be able to remind me soon--early next year--if I was "not seeing things too clear" when I submitted this message. Bonus points if you get the cultural reference.

That's what I think is goin' down. It's not an opportune moment for me to say anything more about this.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 12-05-2019).]

IP: Logged
cliffw
Member

Posts: 32442
From: Bandera, Texas, USA
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 285
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 02:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for cliffwClick Here to Email cliffwSend a Private Message to cliffwReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
"Legislate, Investigate, Litigate."

Y'all can think of her as LIL' Nancy.
If you saw her this morning, less than an hour ago (I think) you likely heard her say that.


LIL' Nancy, do you mean Nancy Botox ?
What did they legislate that passed ? Perhaps Madam Speaker ought to read the "Art of the Deal".

Investigate ? With a 'guilty' conclusion they want to be true.

Litigate ? With unfair hearings ?


 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
"Mitch" said just the other day that it is inconceivable that the Senate will arrive at the Two Thirds of all voting members to remove him from office.

I'm just calling it a "long shot."


It is best to remember that to other be thought of as brain dead, it is best not to open your mouth and to be proved so.

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
I think it's a lead (Pb) pipe cinch that the House will approve Articles of Impeachment on a very sharply divided partisan or D vs R kind of vote.


Nancy Botox says that will not be good.

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
My sources ...


Your source ? Or the voices in your head, from MSNBC, CNN, et al.

 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:
Y'all be able to remind me soon--early next year--if I was "not seeing things too clear" when I submitted this message. Bonus points if you get the cultural reference.


We won't have to remind you, you will know.

I don't know of a cultural reference, nor do I need bonus points. Curious though.

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member

Posts: 11937
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 89
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 03:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageClick Here to Email williegoatSend a Private Message to williegoatReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

My sources have said that Mitch McConnell is not likely to try to avoid an IT (impeachment trial) in the Senate with a motion to dismiss, but that even if he tried it, he wouldn't have the simple majority vote that would be required. The motion would be opposed by almost every Senator with a "D", and there would be enough "R"s that would prefer to have an IT. Even if they expect to conduct themselves in such a way that not one of the Articles or charges (indictments, in effect) will receive the Two Thirds ...


Why would he want to avoid such a great opportunity to expose the facts to the harsh light of day? I would love to see the Bidens squirm testify.

 
quote
Originally posted by cliffw:

I don't know of a cultural reference, nor do I need bonus points. Curious though.


Another one of renselberg's starry eyed "show tune" references, I'll bet you are shocked, huh?
IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member

Posts: 49546
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 553
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 05:21 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonClick Here to Email rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
A little digging found some of Pelosi's skeletons. Her father was in a very cozy relationship with the Boston mob boss. Her brother was accused in a gang rape of 2 girls, 11 and 13. He was acquitted by a purported payoff. Her son was charged with a securities fraud scheme.. but acquitted for lack of evidence. Snopes reports (which I accept with a grain of salt usually) reported everything in accusations was lacking enough evidence to base as truth or not. The only thing Snopes agreed with was Pelosi being the owner of a pizza shop that operated a child **** ring was found to be untrue.
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member

Posts: 27898
From: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 220
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 05:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsClick Here to Email blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rogergarrison:

A little digging found some of Pelosi's skeletons.


They all have skeletons in the dark and deep closets and I don't care which side of the aisle we're talking about. Show me a Politician that left office poorer than when they were elected. The question in my mind is, is this an impeachable offense. Was this request for investigation only benefitting President Trump or, do we have a right to know what Hunter Biden got paid to do and what VP Biden did to help himself and son.

Personally, I still want to know what Hunter Biden got paid to do and what he actually did. The question of whether or not the request of President Trump for an investigation was just for his benefit or for ours appears to be dependent on which side of the aisle you reside on.

Rams

IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member

Posts: 37101
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 328
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 06:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgClick Here to Email BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


They all have skeletons in the dark and deep closets and I don't care which side of the aisle we're talking about. Show me a Politician that left office poorer than when they were elected.


Yup.

 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams: The question in my mind is, is this an impeachable offense.


I believe it was.

 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:Was this request for investigation only benefitting President Trump or, do we have a right to know what Hunter Biden got paid to do and what VP Biden did to help himself and son.


I believe he attempted it for his own political gain.
I don't believe he cares one bit about corruption unless it benefits him.
He's untrustworthy, plain and simple.

 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
Personally, I still want to know what Hunter Biden got paid to do and what he actually did.


Oh, I'm sure those doing the hiring thought it couldn't hurt hiring the son of an influential politician.
Whether anyone made an actual deal as a condition of employment is what is worth knowing.

 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:The question of whether or not the request of President Trump for an investigation was just for his benefit or for ours appears to be dependent on which side of the aisle you reside on.


I believe anyone that has been on the planet Earth dealing with other humans from all walks of life for any length of time knows full-well exactly what he was trying to do, regardless of where one stands politically.
He tried to do what he has always tried to do as a businessman; Increase the odds in his favor.
By hook or crook.

It's the proven nature of his known character.
He may have been the hopeful lessor of two evils, but we shouldn't be in the market for evils at all.

We deserve better, but who that could be I have no idea.
Nothing within current eyesight, that's for sure.

P.S. That being said, impeachment is not something I desire. It's not going to bring us together as a nation, it's going to tear us farther apart.
In this instance of attempt, I would much rather see some lessor alterative, i.e. warning/reprimand/censure etc.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member

Posts: 20158
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 301
Rate this member

Report this Post12-05-2019 08:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I put a fresh coat of paint on the shop walls today after spending the earlier part of the week prepping. Five gallons of primer and five gallons of paint.

Thanks President Trump for Making America Great Again!




Again, friends, family, and neighbors. Look around you. Who is prospering? Why are they prospering? Who is failing? Wash, rinse, repeat.

A very small percentage of America is anti-Trump. Some complain, while others accomplish.

[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 12-05-2019).]

IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 3 pages long:  1   2   3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock