NY Times Facing a Trump administration rule that forbids referrals for abortion, the organization decided to reject federal funds for family planning for low-income women.
Why would they do it ? Realizing the name 'Planned Parenthood' is a misnomer, they claimed that they wanted to provide women health care options and that's what the Federal money enabled them to do.
quote
Services like birth control and pregnancy tests, as well as screenings for sexually transmitted diseases and breast and cervical cancer. In some rural communities, Planned Parenthood is the only provider of such services.
quote
Planned Parenthood receives about $60 million annually through the federal program, known as Title X.
A few thoughts. The Dumbs (leaders), and the dumbs (voters) are going to be mad . The dumbs will believe that the evil Conservatioves caused them to lose these (I beleve) compassionate services (excluding abortion). The Dumbs will have less lobbying payoffs available.
Other providers, likely even new ones, will be glad to pick up that 60 million a year off of the table. ( It is said Planned Parenthood got 60 million yearly. I do not know how many other dollars went to other providers. )
Another win for our President, another promise kept ? No Donald, I am not tired of winning yet.
A few questions. What is Planned Parenthood going to do ? Shut the doors ? They don't charge anybody.
Why didn't Planned Parenthood offer low income men Planned Parenthood services ? They are parents too ( though many men sent their hoes to get an abortion rather than step up and do the right thing, or pay child support, some multiple times.
There are a lot of stories being swept under the rug by our friendly liberal media. frack the left. Until they can play nice, I am taking my ball and going home.
Originally posted by Tony Kania: There are a lot of stories being swept under the rug by our friendly liberal media. frack the left. Until they can play nice, I am taking my ball and going home.
They will never play nice Tony, I am sure you realize that. It's time WE played a different game, perhaps their same games, by their rules. Make them up as WE go along.
By the way, my source was as liberal as it gets. The NY Times. There were (?) 842 comments but I could only read seven. I guess I need to subscribe (NOT). The comments were "closed" to new comments. I wonder why. The ones I could read, were by dumbs who were outraged and vowed to donate to Planned Parenthood, some upping their donations. That filled my heart with glee, , as those that object to abortion should not have to support it. My guess as to the reason why comments were closed is because liberals were getting their azz handed to them by conservatives. One kind of community activism I support.
Yahoo erases "reaction" that do not fit their leftist/marxist agenda. I like to know the level of butthurtedness that the socialists have.
Literally spanked a socialist today with facts and happiness. A VERY influential person in our government. State level and beyond. Basically, America will never be Venezuela, or even Sweden. You "Low IQ individuals" really do not stand a chance.
Why didn't Planned Parenthood offer low income men Planned Parenthood services ? They are parents too ( though many men sent their hoes to get an abortion rather than step up and do the right thing, or pay child support, some multiple times.
They do offer preventative contraception for men, as well as educational material, regardless of income. What other service would you like Planned Parenthood to provide for men? They don't provide vasectomies, but they also don't provide the closest female equivalent - the tubal ligation. Just curious what you think they should be providing for men other than education and preventive measures.
[This message has been edited by FieroSTETZ (edited 08-27-2019).]
Originally posted by FieroSTETZ: They do offer preventative contraception for men, as well as educational material, regardless of income.
Free rubbers ? I stand corrected. I knew I could get them at Planned Parenthood, even if I had to tell them they were for my wife, my girlfriend, my hoe. Even a pervert diddling a legally underage girl can get them. They advertise themselves as a woman's health service, not a men's health service.
quote
Originally posted by FieroSTETZ: What other service would you like Planned Parenthood to provide for men? They don't provide vasectomies, but they also don't provide the closest female equivalent - the tubal ligation.
Do they provide breast cancer exams, cervical exams for women ? Yes, they proclaim that mission as reason for funding from US Taxpayer. There are many impoverished citizen service clinics that can and do the same thing. Do they give men cancer screenings ? I would not be surprised in they did give STD exams for men. I don't know if they do but they should, I reckon.
Does Planned Parenthood offer parental counseling for women ? Not to my knowledge, and I might take a bet that they don't. All of that is done by Child Protective Services. Do they offer financial counseling, for mothers which need it if they keep a child, or parents (including men) who want to know if they can afford another ?
quote
Originally posted by FieroSTETZ: Just curious what you think they should be providing for men other than education and preventive measures.
I appreciate your question Mr. STETZ.
I posted in another thread (I checked back in this one) questions of my own.
Would you do business with someone who misrepresented themselves ? Would you require all citizen's pay the costs of liars ?
Planned Parenthood was designed as a eugenics measure. Much like Hitler and the Jews, and other depots around the world. Slavery sellers of the same race (or others) included. It is being used by the Dumbs to divide and build political base.
Planned Parenthood's locations are mostly in impoverished minority communities. Now the Dumbs want impoverished minorities to enter the USA at will, . As a future base of voters who want government to take care of them.
My nephew and I went to P/P FOR info on what rights a expecting dad has. and they would not even talk to, or tell him who to goto. As far as they were concerned the sperm donor has no say in , if the baby is aborted. As far as I cold tell from the pamphlets on display, They have zero to do with planned parenthood. poor, kid wanted to do the right thing, and was told, tuff your opinion on what happens doesn't matter. you have no rights or say in the matter.
[This message has been edited by E.Furgal (edited 08-28-2019).]
Originally posted by E.Furgal: My nephew and I went to P/P FOR info on what rights a expecting dad has. and they would not even talk to, or tell him who to go to.
As far as they were concerned the sperm donor has no say in , if the baby is aborted.
As far as I cold tell from the pamphlets on display, they have zero to do with planned parenthood.
Thank you. Good point.
Go figure. The sperm donor can be subject to 18+ years of child support if a woman wants to fulfill her motherly instinct, but has no say in if "his" child is aborted. Where is that sexually equality that women want ?
Go figure. The sperm donor can be subject to 18+ years of child support if a woman wants to fulfill her motherly instinct, but has no say in if "his" child is aborted. Where is that sexually equality that women want ?
Equality is never been on the table. just look at the me too, crap. A woman that is drunk can't make rational decisions , but the drunk guy can? if that is the case, guess they'll have to throw out a female dui's also.
Because they opted out of Title X funds, less than a month ago. So Federal dollars did prop up abortion ? Not so Planned Parenthood would have you believe.
quote
my linky The two locations that will be closing do not provide abortion care, a second Planned Parenthood official told ABC News.
Abortion care, ?
quote
linky Kersha Deibel, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, ... "These closures are the result of ... an administration that has made it clear that it wants to force out trusted health centers that provide evidence-based, comprehensive reproductive health care," Deibel said in a statement to ABC News.
quote
Originally posted by 2.5: If they would like to base their business on abortion, they really should change the name, they don't really fit as planning or parenthood.
Kersha Deibel, her words, "trusted health centers that provide evidence-based, comprehensive reproductive health care". CRHC (comprehensive reproductive health care) is not too catchy. People might bring in their kids who have the sniffles.
A man and and a woman from Alabama don't want any more children because they already have 11. So the husband goes to a doctor in Ohio. The doctor asks, "What state are you from?
The man say,s "Alabama." The doctor tells him to go home, put a lit cherry bomb in an empty soda can, hold it in his hand, and count to 10. The husband isn't so sure of this, so he goes to another doctor, this time in California.
When that doctor finds out that the husband is from Alabama, he tells him the exact same thing that the doctor in Ohio told him. The husband figures that the doctors must be right.
So he goes home, puts a lit cherry bomb in a soda can, and starts to count. ''1...2...3...4...5...'' The husband takes the soda can and puts it between his legs to continue counting on his fingers on his right hand. ''6...7...8...9...''
Planned parenthood should not get any taxdollars. Why hasn't the "conserv's not opened up a real planned parenthood type business, and let trump totally send the funds to a real parenthood planning health care business model. Yes I understand they have to use another name, but what I'm wondering is if, someone did this, would they be required by law(fed or state) to offer the apportion option? That be the only reason I can see, that stop the conserve's from starting another business that helps parents become parents. As being required to offer that option would be a huge sticking point. This also show the public that the dems only care about apportion as they fight sending/granting funds to this business, hard. forcing them to tell their sheep , their true motives
[This message has been edited by E.Furgal (edited 10-04-2019).]
. The dumbs will believe that the evil Conservatioves caused them to lose these (I beleve) compassionate services (excluding abortion). The Dumbs will have less lobbying payoffs available.
, as those that object to abortion should not have to support it.
. As a future base of voters who want government to take care of them.
