Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T
  Just Announced, No Collusion! (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version

This topic is 5 pages long:  1   2   3   4   5 
Previous Page | Next Page
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Just Announced, No Collusion! by blackrams
Started on: 03-24-2019 02:57 PM
Replies: 162 (2563 views)
Last post by: Tony Kania on 05-10-2019 12:16 PM
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-25-2019 06:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:

Where's the evidence?

Good question, I think you can just listen to the legal analysts that are all over the networks and decide for yourself if there is enough evidence to pursue an investigation.
 
quote


What makes you think nonsense investigation into a nonsense investigation isn't setting a precedent that will perpetuate a cycle of abuse?

Without sounding like I a jerk or disrespectful, I will just say that what you just said is investigating abuses and possible crimes is nonsense.I disagree with you
IP: Logged
Fiero2m4Fastback
Member
Posts: 160
From: Dallas
Registered: Sep 2017


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post03-26-2019 04:52 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Fiero2m4FastbackSend a Private Message to Fiero2m4FastbackEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

..... you just said is investigating abuses and possible crimes is nonsense.I disagree with you

Go ahead, just blatantly lie about what I said. Just like all the religious Mueller investigation supporters.

[This message has been edited by Fiero2m4Fastback (edited 03-26-2019).]

IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 17901
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 06:58 AM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:


I'm not, you've given no reason and no specific law that there's any evidence of being broken that would weren't another investigation yet you're insisting it has been broken to fit a narrative much like the rhetoric the media constantly spammed us with.


In the spirit of being properly understood....

Did you mean to say 'warrant', rather than 'weren't', in the quoted sentence?
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 31839
From: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 229
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 07:38 AM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:

Go ahead, just blatantly lie about what I said. Just like all the religious Mueller investigation supporters.



Whoa there Big Fella.........
Who just got grouped together? Or would that be a cult? I'm so confused......

Rams


IP: Logged
Hudini
Member
Posts: 9029
From: Tennessee
Registered: Feb 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 165
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 07:48 AM Click Here to See the Profile for HudiniSend a Private Message to HudiniEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:

Go ahead, just blatantly lie about what I said. Just like all the religious Mueller investigation supporters.



I’m really confused what you are arguing for or against.
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post03-26-2019 08:56 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
It seems there is a bit of shock coming from the demoncrats. This footage was just released by CNN...

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=k4SvQ_1553569495
IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43222
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 09:13 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by blackrams:


Whoa there Big Fella.........
Who just got grouped together? Or would that be a cult? I'm so confused......

Rams



Maybe he means they religiously support it. The generic term.

"I religiously brush my teeth", etc.
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 17901
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 09:19 AM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Tony Kania:

It seems there is a bit of shock coming from the demoncrats. This footage was just released by CNN...

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=k4SvQ_1553569495


That's the best version of that video yet!
IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 10:01 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:

Go ahead, just blatantly lie about what I said.

This is what you said: "Where's the evidence? What makes you think nonsense investigation into a nonsense investigation isn't setting a precedent that will perpetuate a cycle of abuse?" I did not lie about anything you said, I interpret your words to say that an investigation into abuses and crimes is nonsense. That is LITERALLY what you wrote.

 
quote

Just like all the religious Mueller investigation supporters.


The difference between them and I is that they hate Trump and are scandalous enough to drum up bogus accusations that were obviously political in nature. They also brought up those bogus accusations before a secret court that has little to no oversight. I want a legitimate investigation to find and root out corruption. And you said that would be nonsense, I disagree with you.

[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 03-26-2019).]

IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 17901
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 11:43 AM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
And Pelosi says publicly that AG Barr cannot be trusted.....
IP: Logged
Fiero2m4Fastback
Member
Posts: 160
From: Dallas
Registered: Sep 2017


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post03-26-2019 11:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Fiero2m4FastbackSend a Private Message to Fiero2m4FastbackEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Hudini:


I’m really confused what you are arguing for or against.


People have suggested the investigation needs to be investigated because they feel like some laws were broken, however they aren't basing it off any evidence, they just say "I'm sure there is some" much like the people who were obsessed with the Mueller investigation. No amount of social pressure should be responsible for "Red Herring" investigations. Wether they want to admit it or not, if your suggesting there be an investigation yet you know of no evidence, you're a social justice warrior.

None of this applies of there's evidence, but if it exists, nobody cares to reference it.

[This message has been edited by Fiero2m4Fastback (edited 03-26-2019).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Fiero2m4Fastback
Member
Posts: 160
From: Dallas
Registered: Sep 2017


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post03-26-2019 11:48 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Fiero2m4FastbackSend a Private Message to Fiero2m4FastbackEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

Fiero2m4Fastback

160 posts
Member since Sep 2017
 
quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:


In the spirit of being properly understood....

Did you mean to say 'warrant', rather than 'weren't', in the quoted sentence?


Correct, good catch.
IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 11:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

And Pelosi says publicly that AG Barr cannot be trusted.....


Ok, fair enough. Let's have her produce a list of "trustworthy" people that she and the dems can work with in a professional manner.

Because I have issues with a few 2nd amendment stances that Barry has made. He is far from "perfect".
IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 12:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

Rickady88GT

10648 posts
Member since Dec 2002
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:


People have suggested the investigation needs to be investigated because they feel like some laws were broken, however they aren't basing it off any evidence, they just say "I'm sure there is some" much like the people who were obsessed with the Mueller investigation. No amount of social pressure should be responsible for "Red Herring" investigations. Wether they want to admit it or not, if your suggesting there be an investigation yet you know of no evidence, you're a social justice warrior.

None of this applies of there's evidence, but if it exists, nobody cares to reference it.



You do realize that an investigation looks for evidence?

Criminal investigation is an applied science that involves the study of facts, used to identify, locate and prove the guilt of an accused criminal. A complete criminal investigation can include searching, interviews, interrogations, evidence collection and preservation and various methods of investigation.

An investigation does not require "evidence" to be conducted or started. It is not the equivalent of being "charged" with a crime. Investigations are carried out to discover, find and collect evidence to then charge individuals with crimes.

When Comey was asked by Congress What does it take to start an FBI investigation?" This was his answer to Congress "Comey responded, saying that there are a “couple different [standards] at play.” Elaborating, he said the FBI needs a “credible allegation of wrongdoing or reasonable basis to believe that an American” is committing a federal crime in order to initiate an investigation." Note that there was no mention of "requirements of evidence".
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 17901
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 01:38 PM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:


If there's evidence, by all means, bring charges.

Or would you rather have an investigation, of an investigation, of an investigation, of an investigation?



Again, a post for clarification.

My statement is relevant not to the Mueller investigation of POTUS, it refers to the need to investigate the apparent abuse of the FISA court, possible weaponization of the FBI by some agents in conjunction with the HRC campaign, and any involvement of previous administration officials.


IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 02:00 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:
Again, a post for clarification.

My statement is relevant not to the Mueller investigation of POTUS, it refers to the need to investigate the apparent abuse of the FISA court, possible weaponization of the FBI by some agents in conjunction with the HRC campaign, and any involvement of previous administration officials.



EXACTLY
IP: Logged
Fiero2m4Fastback
Member
Posts: 160
From: Dallas
Registered: Sep 2017


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

User Banned

Report this Post03-26-2019 06:26 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fiero2m4FastbackSend a Private Message to Fiero2m4FastbackEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

“credible allegation of wrongdoing or reasonable basis to believe that an American” is committing a federal crime in order to initiate an investigation."


AKA, evidence.
IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19334
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 103
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 08:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I just got this in an email from the AZGOP: https://email.connectstrate...045B16FB8100885F948E
 
quote
America has been cheated, defrauded, and lied to for nearly TWO YEARS! Since the beginning of this historic presidency, Democrats have done everything in their power to disparage, sideline and obstruct our nation’s duly elected president, Donald J. Trump.

The expense of their witch hunt has been an unprecedented $50,230.00 per day—nearly $35,000,000.00 in total—and American taxpayers have been exploited by Democrats into footing the bill for their partisan lies and obstructionism.

Send a message to Congress saying we DEMAND a refund! Sign the letter below at www.witchhuntrefund.com and let your voice be heard. You can also send this letter to your friends by sharing our posts on Twitter (here) and Facebook (here). The more signatures, the better!

IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-26-2019 09:48 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Fiero2m4Fastback:


AKA, evidence.


That is perfectly fine, if that is what you were saying. BUT in "legal" terms you did not articulate your point of view very well. You should have (in my opinion) not been so quick to jump on people for a miss justice when in fact you may have been using different definitions. Evidence is not the same as reasonable believe. One is fact and another is a strong suspicion. They are not the same, legally speaking from a Law Enforcement perspective.

 
quote
Originally posted by Doug85GT:


On another note, the report states that there is no evidence of collusion. If the investigation ended with no evidence that means it also started with no evidence. Let that sink in.


This is a QUOTE from another thread that is EXACTLY what I have been saying in this thread. Let it sink in.

[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 03-26-2019).]

IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 12:23 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Latest media estimate to reach my ears: The Mueller report comes to about 300 pages. Yesterday, I heard 700 pages. Whobody knows?

Mueller famously executed a "hand off"--to use NFL terminology--of Michael Cohen's case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or "SDNY."

I think that the reason that Mueller's team went forward with the prosecution of Paul Manafort for multiple counts of tax evasion and bank fraud--crimes that he committed before his involvement with the Trump campaign--instead of handing the Manafort case, in Michael Cohen-like fashion, to another team of prosecutors, was their dissatisfaction with Paul Manafort. He had signed a Cooperating Witness agreement with the Special Counsel's office, but that agreement was later nullified by a judge at the request of Mueller's prosecutors. His Cooperating Witness agreement was nullified before his prison sentences were finalized by the two judges that had jurisdiction in the (two) cases of "United States vs Paul Manafort..."

Had I been the Special Prosecutor (queue up the laugh track) I would have done the same thing myself. Hang on to the Manafort case, so that Manafort was looking (so to speak) at my team's prosecutors and not some other team of prosecutors, all the way up to his final sentencing. Why? Leverage. The psychology of "leverage." Thinking that would be the better way to handle it, in terms of maximizing the possibility that Manafort would rethink on the "stonewalling" (in the estimation of the Special Counsel's office) and open up with more witness cooperation about his foreign connections and his meetings during the Trump campaign with that cigar-smokin', suspected covert agent of the Russian Federation, Konstantin Kilimnik.

With the Trump campaign in full swing, and during the interval when Manafort was the Trump campaign's manager, Manafort boarded a flight to Madrid to meet with Konstantin Kilimnik on foreign soil, and then had another meeting at the Grand Havana Club in Jared Kushner's 666 5th Avenue building in NYC. That's when Manafort transferred what has been described (in so many words) as "more than 70 pages of sensitive, high value polling data from the Trump campaign" to Konstantin Kilimnik. Rick Gates was involved with that same meeting, and it became known to the Special Counsel that the three men--Manafort, Gates and Kilimnik--each made their separate way out after that meeting.

If an Ancient Mariner had been walking those same streets of New York City, he could have "stoppeth(ed) one of three." And--assuming he was caught on a surveillance camera--been summoned by the Mueller team, interrogated and perhaps given testimony to the Grand Jury. But I diverge.

There's a new media report (yesterday) that's sure to please.

Mueller grand jury 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says
The revelation — while laced with uncertainty — indicates that the ongoing cases Mueller handed off could still feature significant developments.
Darren Samuelsohn for Politico; March 27, 2019.
https://www.politico.com/st...r-grand-jury-1238861

A couple of "highlights:"

 
quote
David Goodhand, an assistant U.S. attorney, acknowledged the grand jury’s active status during a hearing in U.S. District Court over a push to unveil the identity of a foreign state-owned firm that has been held in contempt for defying a Mueller subpoena. The mystery company’s case was denied a hearing before the Supreme Court earlier this week, and in the meantime, the open government group Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press has sought access to all materials in the clandestine litigation, including the company’s identity.

 
quote
Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor teaching law at Duke University, said the grand jury could still be meeting “on drain the swamp cases” akin to the one brought against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Gates for failing to disclose foreign lobbying activity. He noted that one of the lead Mueller prosecutors in the Manafort-Gates case, Brandon Van Grack, is leading a new DOJ unit assigned to enforcing that law.


Makes me wish I had a snifter close at hand, containing a pour of good cognac, and a cigar of the kind that's popular at the Grand Havana Room. (I'd just give the cigar away.)

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-28-2019).]

IP: Logged
rogergarrison
Member
Posts: 49601
From: A Western Caribbean Island/ Columbus, Ohio
Registered: Apr 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 551
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 12:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rogergarrisonSend a Private Message to rogergarrisonEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Like Ive said, Dems were all for Mueller and the investigation. Now that it dont do anything FOR them, its all fraud and lies, and everyone in the investigation is a criminal. (mmmm do I detect a pattern here ) On a brighter side, I hope they release the whole report so it will show the libs how much BIGGER fools they are.

[This message has been edited by rogergarrison (edited 03-28-2019).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 01:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

"On another note, the report states that there is no evidence of collusion. If the investigation ended with no evidence that means it also started with no evidence. Let that sink in."

This is a QUOTE from another thread that is EXACTLY what I have been saying in this thread. Let it sink in.


I think this is what needs to "sink in:"
 
quote
The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in [Russia’s] efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the [Mueller] report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in [Russia’s] election interference activities.

That is from AG Barr's four-page summary, which he sent over the weekend as a letter to Congress.

To say that the Mueller investigation "did not establish... conspiracy or coordination" is by no way the same as saying "there is no evidence."

I think most of the people that are reaching my ears understand that AG Barr's letter is conveying that the Mueller investigation did not find evidence that was robust enough to justify bringing or stating a case against the Trump campaign--and possibly by implication, President Trump himself--for conspiring with agents of the Russian Federation. Period. It so happens that the well known former New Jersey Superior Court judge, Andrew Napolitano, has just reached my ears with this same understanding on his part. A few minutes ago. On MSNBC.

Federal prosecutors are known for not wanting to bring or state charges without the kind of evidence that gives confidence in their ability to win in court. They are not prone to "write checks with their mouth that they can't cash with their a[zz]." Robert Swan Mueller III is certainly a federal prosecutor of considerable renown.

I recommend this new column (just two days ago) from Fortune:

William Barr's Letter on the Mueller Report Left These 16 Pressing Questions Unanswered
Andrew Martin, David Voreacos, David Kocieniewski, and Bloomberg, for Fortune; March 26, 2019.
http://fortune.com/2019/03/...ussia-investigation/

Includes a brief video segment.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-28-2019).]

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19334
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 103
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 01:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

Makes me wish I had a snifter close at hand, containing a pour of good cognac,.....

You might want to replace that cognac with some smelling salts.

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 03-28-2019).]

IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 04:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote


To say that the Mueller investigation "did not establish... conspiracy or coordination" is by no way the same as saying "there is no evidence."



Ronald we will just start from the beginning. There is no established laws broken concerning "collusion".
First : "collusion" is not a felony.
Second : a smear campaign is not a felony.
Third : Trump did not obstruct justice.
Let those sink in.

The Russians did hack into some computers and release emails, which were accurate and unedited. That is true, but that was common knowledge even back then. What the report found is that Trump had nothing to do with it.

What the report failed to acknowledge is that America is better off knowing what Clinton was really about and that Russia HELPED America by doing so.

[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post03-28-2019 05:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Squirt Bottle Pelosi is pizzed!




A little music for the mood...

IP: Logged
Rickady88GT
Member
Posts: 10648
From: Central CA
Registered: Dec 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 202
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 06:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Rickady88GTSend a Private Message to Rickady88GTEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Tony Kania:

Squirt Bottle Pelosi is pizzed!




I LOVE to see her spitting mad, that ONLY means one thing, America is winning. She has always been a fool, but the vibrating and stuttering is the icing on the cake.
IP: Logged
blackrams
Member
Posts: 31839
From: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Registered: Feb 2003


Feedback score:    (9)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 229
Rate this member

Report this Post03-28-2019 06:54 PM Click Here to See the Profile for blackramsSend a Private Message to blackramsEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:

I LOVE to see her spitting mad, that ONLY means one thing, America is winning. She has always been a fool, but the vibrating and stuttering is the icing on the cake.


Speaker Pelowsi is (or should be) an embarrassment to every Democrat. Personally, I'm embarrassed she's a US citizen. Electing her to represent a group speaks volumes about the group.

Rams
IP: Logged
Tony Kania
Member
Posts: 20794
From: The Inland Northwest
Registered: Dec 2008


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 305
User Banned

Report this Post03-29-2019 09:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Tony KaniaSend a Private Message to Tony KaniaEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
"Ridiculous Bull Shat "

[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 11:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Rickady88GT:
Ronald we will just start from the beginning. There is no established laws broken concerning "collusion".
First : "collusion" is not a felony.
Second : a smear campaign is not a felony.
Third : Trump did not obstruct justice.
Let those sink in.

The Russians did hack into some computers and release emails, which were accurate and unedited. That is true, but that was common knowledge even back then. What the report found is that Trump had nothing to do with it.

What the report failed to acknowledge is that America is better off knowing what Clinton was really about and that Russia HELPED America by doing so.

Thanks for that. I am (mostly) going to Biden--I mean bide--my time on this topic, until more of the actual Mueller report becomes public. I doubt that the entire report will be held back from public scrutiny. Some of it, I think, will be released.

I actually didn't focus on the Clinton-related emails that were "set free" by Wikileaks, with the help of the Russian Federation.

What were the big takeaways?

My impressions are such:

1. Hillary Clinton was being talked about in a sharply negative way from some (many?) of the people who were part of her campaign. Including her own campaign manager, John Podesta.

2. The emergence of Hillary as the Democratic candidate was achieved by a kind of Machiavellian-style Beat Down of Bernie Sanders. "Superdelegates", and a blatantly pro-Hillary Democratic Party Chair in the person of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Hillary won out by ensuring a "playing field" at the Democratic Convention that was tilted in her favor.

The content of any of the leaked emails never grabbed hardly any of my attention.

So where does that take this discussion?

Was there anything really surprising to anyone that came out in these leaked emails? Any kind of thing(s) that were not already "baked in" to the general estimation of Hillary Clinton, as perceived across the broad American voter demographic? Or more especially, the Pennock's Totally Off Topic member demographic?

What did I miss?

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19334
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 103
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 11:46 AM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

The content of any of the leaked emails never grabbed hardly any of my attention.

So that is why you chose not to talk about here? (Except, of course the 115 words above)

 
quote

So where does that take this discussion?

Off topic?

 
quote

Was there anything really surprising to anyone that came out in these leaked emails? Any kind of thing(s) that were not already "baked in" to the general estimation of Hillary Clinton, as perceived across the broad American voter demographic? Or more especially, the Pennock's Totally Off Topic member demographic?

....or here? (164 words now)

 
quote


What did I miss?

Ooh, ooh....I know this one: the conclusion of the Mueller Report.

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 12:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Isn't the purpose of an online discussion forum to share?

Was there anything about the Clinton Foundation, or "Uranium One", or "Benghazi" in these leaked emails? Anything about her private email server? Did the Wikileaks dumps reveal any otherwise not widely known aspect of the "Hillary Emails" thing?

We can't all be experts on everything. I'm just a simple-minded Mueller Investigation "tech"...
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 12:26 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post

rinselberg

16118 posts
Member since Mar 2010
Anything about the Trump "dossier" that surfaced in the leaked emails? I think that could not be the case, since I think it would already be known to me, but that's another question that just emerged for me.
IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19334
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 103
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 12:39 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by rinselberg:

Isn't the purpose of an online discussion forum to share?

Was there anything about the Clinton Foundation, or "Uranium One", or "Benghazi" in these leaked emails? Anything about her private email server? Did the Wikileaks dumps reveal any otherwise not widely known aspect of the "Hillary Emails" thing?

We can't all be experts on everything. I'm just a simple-minded Mueller Investigation "tech"...

I'm just giving you a hard time. I probably go off topic more than most.
IP: Logged
olejoedad
Member
Posts: 17901
From: Clarendon Twp., MI
Registered: May 2004


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 205
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 12:48 PM Click Here to See the Profile for olejoedadSend a Private Message to olejoedadEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
IP: Logged
williegoat
Member
Posts: 19334
From: Glendale, AZ
Registered: Mar 2009


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 103
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 12:54 PM Click Here to See the Profile for williegoatClick Here to visit williegoat's HomePageSend a Private Message to williegoatEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by olejoedad:

https://thefederalist.com/2...16-hillary-clintons/

If only we had honest, unbiased media who would report to the public on such things.

Every suburban housewife has heard the name Mueller, but nobody knows about Rosatom or Bruce and Nellie.
(Whenever I hear the name Nellie, I can't help but think of Dudley Do-Right)

[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
2.5
Member
Posts: 43222
From: Southern MN
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 01:22 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 2.5Send a Private Message to 2.5Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by williegoat:

If only we had honest, unbiased media who would report to the public on such things.

Every suburban housewife has heard the name Mueller, but nobody knows about Rosatom or Bruce and Nellie.
(Whenever I hear the name Nellie, I can't help but think of Dudley Do-Right)



I think of this one



IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 69576
From: Copperas Cove Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 441
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 02:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
And when I see her or hear her name, I think of this, even in her adult age.
IP: Logged
rinselberg
Member
Posts: 16118
From: Sunnyvale, CA (USA)
Registered: Mar 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 147
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 02:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for rinselbergClick Here to visit rinselberg's HomePageSend a Private Message to rinselbergEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Re: previous message from olejoedad

So, here is the "affidavit" provided to this Pennock's Oversight Committee by member olejoedad

"The Only 2016 Campaign That Deliberately Colluded With Russians Was Hillary Clinton’s"
Sean Davis for The Federalist; March 28, 2019.
https://thefederalist.com/2...16-hillary-clintons/

An interesting read.

There are four questions that pop into my head, at this moment.

1. Was any of this revealed or confirmed by any of the Hillary Clinton-related emails that were so kindly made public by Wikileaks?

2. Has any of this been "heard" or discussed by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that has been chaired by Richard Burr?

3. Was any of this referenced or discussed in the last report that was made public by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence?

4. I remember that Lindsey Graham was one of two senators (Grassley, the other; I think) that signed a Letter of Criminal Referral that was sent to DOJ some time ago, when it was AG Jeff Sessions. The letter was about (or partly about) the Steele Dossier and Christopher Steele. Wonder what happened with that? Did the letter just disappear into one of those "black holes" that I was gabbing about earlier today, in that "Warp Speed One" thread that I started here several days ago?

I may be a "drooling moron" unless or until I discover more about any of these four questions. But don't call me that. It just gets me sidetracked, thinking about how I could try to get "even" for it.

[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-29-2019).]

IP: Logged
SlingBlade87
Junior Member
Posts: 1
From: Lufkin, Texas
Registered: Aug 2014


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 04:47 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SlingBlade87Send a Private Message to SlingBlade87Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I think politicians come up with the drama to keep us entertained so that we do not hound them for not doing the jobs they were elected to do.

(This is just a test post; it's been a decade since I signed in)
IP: Logged
Khw
Member
Posts: 11139
From: South Weber, UT. U.S.A.
Registered: Jun 2008


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 134
Rate this member

Report this Post03-29-2019 07:18 PM Click Here to See the Profile for KhwSend a Private Message to KhwEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by SlingBlade87:

I think politicians come up with the drama to keep us entertained so that we do not hound them for not doing the jobs they were elected to do.

(This is just a test post; it's been a decade since I signed in)


So what was your prior user name? Just curious since the account you posted from was created in 2014 and that was only 5 years ago not 10 (a decade).
IP: Logged
Previous Page | Next Page

This topic is 5 pages long:  1   2   3   4   5 
next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock