| quote | Originally posted by Fats:
Note the quotes, stealing is stealing. Even if you make it legal.
California had several Republicans win, but days after the election ballots that were "turned in" via ballot harvesting (legal in California) flipped every seat to Democrat.
We all followed the Florida debacle.
Maine, I believe it was, a Republican won handily, but because of the percentage it was sent to a super secret computerized system, and guess what? Turns out the Democrat is now the winner.
North Carolina a poll worker (who worked for Democrats for years, and this year for Republicans) was found to be "harvesting ballots" for the Republicans. He likely only affected a few votes, but there is the talk of overturning the election because of this fishy stuff... Which in California the Democrats call "democracy", in NC they call it unfair tampering.
Now in Missouri where we got rid of pure evil, they are pushing to remove Hawley from office before he gets seated because they (Democrats) found a spending error on his side (he spent 1/3 of what McCaskill did.)
And I'm certain there is more. This is just what I'm following right now. This is really getting out of hand, there isn't going to be rest until the Democrats push us all into a revolution.
Brad |
|
I know Brad, it really is sickening what California has done.
Florida also "permitted" some stuff that was otherwise incredibly shady. Does everyone know what the under / over votes stand for?
Basically, an example would be... if MOST of your votes were for Democrats, but you didn't vote for a specific seat (left it blank), they would AUTOMATICALLY mark it as a vote for the Democrats. This is... on the face of it, totally illegal and completely unacceptable.
The argument the Democrats make is that they believe that Democrats are often too stupid to vote properly, and we need to help them.
It's true that the overwhelming vast majority of those types of votes were voters who had primarily Democrat votes... that's why they were able to pick up votes. But it still doesn't make it right.
The thing is, Democrats are generally more "emotional" voters... it just is what it is. I have a few friends that are hard-core socialist liberals. One of them refuses to vote for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz because of her corruption in helping Hillary Clinton, and the effect it had against Bernie Sanders. So... in this election he voted for Tim Canonva. But last time, he left that one blank because he just couldn't vote for DWS, but of course, couldn't vote for the Republican.
Likewise... when I was much younger and believed I was more "enlightened," I voted a mix of Republicans and Democrats. I voted for Jeb Bush for Governor, voted for... shoot can't even remember his name for Congress, Klien something, and then voted for Bill Nelson for Senate. So there are people who vote both parties. To my credit, I thought I was voting for Bill Nelson in hopes that he would improve spending / funding towards NASA (Bill Nelson is a former astronaut). Not only did that not happen, but he actually oversaw massive... MASSIVE budget cuts under Obama and cancellation of many huge NASA projects during his tenure, and didn't even complain.
Never the less... the over/under voting stuff is completely illegal... but Brenda Snipes allowed it, and those "made up / assumed" votes ended up counting towards the totals. Thankfully, despite all this, it STILL wasn't enough for the Democrats to win in Florida.