Did anybody know that her own family (not her husband's family) her own biological family has not come out to support her on this claim. Only her husband and her husband family are the ones that submitted letters of support (which the Dems say her family........) But doesn't even mention her own parents or siblings.
That speaks volumes that she obviously has issues with fabrication when her own biological family doesn't even come out to support her.
I have a sister that would try something like this, and the entire family that she grew up with wouldn't show up to support her. Her husbands family don't realize that she's a sociopath, and won't listen to anyone that tells them as much.
You know, if someone's Mom says "Hey, she's a sociopath and I wouldn't close my eyes around her if I were you." And you ignore that "red flag".... It's all on you from that point forward.
The fact that this vote was so close only says how SCREWED UP America is. He had proof that he was not there, credible character witnesses that said he could not do such a thing, a work history of professionalism, accreditations from the highest judicial sources, BUT hate filled activists with an agenda and money from billionaire liberals "soros" and a multi-million-billion dollar industry at risk and Wallah, he is discredited. This was a hands down no contest victory for a stand up Guy. BUT,....... America is without a doubt a new Sodom and Gomorrah.
[This message has been edited by Rickady88GT (edited 09-28-2018).]
Every single Democrat on the committee stated before the hearings that they would oppose him. Every single one. Everything we saw after that was strictly theater.
Does anyone believe the Dems will relent after this next FBI investigation?
How can anyone expect it to be any different than the "Russian collusion" investigation?*
In neither case, is there any evidence that a crime has been committed and there has already been more than enough time to reach a conclusion; but neither of these facts has stemmed the tide of incessant allegations.
*note: Before someone tries to "educate" me, yes, I am aware of the technical and procedural differences in the two investigations, and the differences in scope.
[This message has been edited by williegoat (edited 09-29-2018).]
Originally posted by Rickady88GT: The fact that this vote was so close only says how SCREWED UP America is. He had proof that he was not there, credible character witnesses that said he could not do such a thing, a work history of professionalism, accreditations from the highest judicial sources, BUT hate filled activists with an agenda and money from billionaire liberals "soros" and a multi-million-billion dollar industry at risk and Wallah, he is discredited. This was a hands down no contest victory for a stand up Guy. BUT,....... America is without a doubt a new Sodom and Gomorrah.
Is there an inference to be made here, that there is some particular business or enterprise that is important to George Soros and his group, that the Soros entourage perceives to be at risk if Brett Kavanaugh were to be confirmed?
Abortions? Planned Parenthood? Soros's "Open Society Foundations"..? Soros's progressive-leaning political PAC'ing and media BACK'ing..? All of the aforementioned?
I don't want to get shoulder-faked out of my zone coverage slot guarding the Mueller investigation and try to go "man" against Brett Kavanaugh on the other side of the field, but I am curious about what the exact idea or inference is behind this "multi-million-billion dollar industry" that's been referenced.
The lurkers who are reading but not actively participating might appreciate a brief explanation.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 09-29-2018).]
Every single Democrat on the committee stated before the hearings that they would oppose him. Every single one. Everything we saw after that was strictly theater.
The way I understand it, 5 people are stating that they will not vote "YES" unless an FBI investigation is done. Only 2 of them are democrats, and my money says they will still vote "NO" Even after this investigation, no matter the findings. So my focus is on those 3 Republicans, and I would bet they support baby murder and may very likely vote no as well. This entire sham is about abortion and partisan politics, with a sprinkle of Trump Hate.
Is there an inference to be made here, that there is some particular business or enterprise that is important to George Soros and his group, that the Soros group perceives to be at risk if Brett Kavanaugh were to be confirmed?
Abortions? Planned Parenthood? Soros's "Open Society Foundations"..? Soros's "political PAC'in" and "progressive-leaning media BACK'in"..?
I don't want to get shoulder-faked out of my zone coverage slot guarding the Mueller investigation and try to go "man" against Brett Kavanaugh on the other side of the field, but I am curious about what the exact idea or inference is behind this "multi-million-billion dollar industry" that's been referenced.
The lurkers who are reading but not actively participating might appreciate a brief explanation.
Fordworked for the company that produces RU486, "the morning after pill" or the "abortion pill". She is actively lobbying the College system to force them to provide this pill to students. That is millions of dollars and possibly 100's of millions. Then of course the entire abortion industry is on edge,......as if Bet declared war on it,.....wich byw he has not. The liberals and Democrats have fabricated this story, this straw man.
William Clinton's nominees: Senate confirmation vote for Ruth Bader Ginsburg = 96 - 3 Senate confirmation vote for Steven Breyer = 87-9
Barack Obama's nominees: Republican Senators who voted for Sonia Sotomayor = 9 Republican Senators Republican Senators who voted for Elena Kagan = 5 Republican Senators
George W. Bush's nominee Democrat Senators who voted for Samual Alito = 3 Democrats (all from red states)
Donald Trump's nominee: Democrat Senators who voted for Neil Gorsuch = 2 Democrats (both from red states) You can see how much a supreme court nominee now is so partisan that both side has dug a trench that we probably won't ever go back to the bi-partisan politics of yesteryears. For better or worse, I'm not for sure.
William Clinton's nominees: Senate confirmation vote for Ruth Bader Ginsburg = 96 - 3 Senate confirmation vote for Steven Breyer = 87-9
Barack Obama's nominees: Republican Senators who voted for Sonia Sotomayor = 9 Republican Senators Republican Senators who voted for Elena Kagan = 5 Republican Senators
George W. Bush's nominee Democrat Senators who voted for Samual Alito = 3 Democrats (all from red states)
Donald Trump's nominee: Democrat Senators who voted for Neil Gorsuch = 2 Democrats (both from red states) You can see how much a supreme court nominee now is so partisan that both side has dug a trench that we probably won't ever go back to the bi-partisan politics of yesteryears. For better or worse, I'm not for sure.
This is a complicated issue "partisan". What makes a person partisan? For me the line in the sand is liberalism, as long as a politician or political issue is not liberal, I am bipartisan. But get liberal and I became "partisan". Liberalism is the cancer that has been destroying America and the damage is literally irreversible. America is permanently flawed by it. Like a model is scared after a horrible car accident.
This is a complicated issue "partisan". What makes a person partisan? For me the line in the sand is liberalism, as long as a politician or political issue is not liberal, I am bipartisan. But get liberal and I became "partisan". Liberalism is the cancer that has been destroying America and the damage is literally irreversible. America is permanently flawed by it. Like a model is scared after a horrible car accident.
A woman of questionable repute name Swetnick and a frat boy named Chad Ludington; they couldn't do any better if they were trying to do a parody soap opera.
Today, the libs are saying (even though they get their re investigation) that no matter what the investigation finds, they will as predicted, still fight claiming it was not a fair investigation...before its even begun. Just shows they want their cake and eat it too. Lets get back to getting Hillary in prison along with Bill. Nothing even needs more investigation...everyone on the planet knows theyre both crooks.
Isn't it odd that the same leftists that don't want to acknowledge the Obama administration using the FBI as a political tool are demanding that the FBI be used as a political tool, (again).
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 10-01-2018).]
Well, now it seems that Dr. Ford may have lied to the senate panel. Oops! I believe that is criminal. Her ex is saying that she helped to coach a long time friend of hers on how to take a lie detector test. And she was specifically asked this by the woman the Republicans hired to question her.
Well, now it seems that Dr. Ford may have lied to the senate panel. Oops! I believe that is criminal. Her ex is saying that she helped to coach a long time friend of hers on how to take a lie detector test. And she was specifically asked this by the woman the Republicans hired to question her.
I DEMAND a full and complete FBI investigation into Ford AND Dianne Feinstein. After Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court of America this week.
I just read on another forum, someone referred to Kavanaugh's accuser as "Two Door Ford". That is the funniest thing I have heard from this whole mess.
I just read on another forum, someone referred to Kavanaugh's accuser as "Two Door Ford". That is the funniest thing I have heard from this whole mess.
Soon, the left will claim that both the Executive and Judicial branches are illegitimate, and if they don't gain the Legislative next month, they will disavow the entire U.S. government.
They are already violently disruptive. How much worse will it become? Remember that "the resistance" went mainstream following the Obama administration, which itself grew from the ashes of the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers.
The Democrats are getting back at the republicans for failing to vote on Merrick Garland who was an Obama appointee. The republican majority just held up a vote. The democrats are destroying Kavanaugh's reputation, demonstrating their vindictive nature of their leadership.
Today, the libs are saying (even though they get their re investigation) that no matter what the investigation finds, they will as predicted, still fight claiming it was not a fair investigation...before its even begun. Just shows they want their cake and eat it too. Lets get back to getting Hillary in prison along with Bill. Nothing even needs more investigation...everyone on the planet knows theyre both crooks.
as predicted the left is saying the FBI investigation was corrupt. Thats the usual tactic for them when something dont go their way. Careful for what you ask for sound familar ?
as predicted the left is saying the FBI investigation was corrupt. Thats the usual tactic for them when something dont go their way. Careful for what you ask for sound familar ?
It is hard to imagine that people do not know that this is a stall tactic by the Democrats. The proof will be when the votes are counted, and they fall along party lines.
I think I (correctly) predicted the yes vote from Manchin. He has a very weak (political) jaw and he knows he can't take the punch from the largely red WVa electorate.
Murkowski as a no vote is a bit surprising, but the fact that she was first appointed to the Senate seat by her daddy and she has since won a series of close "squeakers" including a first of it's kind write-in vote, she obviously feels bold enough that she can successfully roll the reelection dice again.
"Part of the court's legitimacy depends on people not seeing the court in the way that people see the rest of the governing structures of this country now. In other words, people thinking of the court as not politically divided in the same way, as not an extension of politics, but instead somehow above the fray," she said.
This is now being mindlessly parroted throughout the leftist propaganda machine.
A woman of questionable repute name Swetnick and a frat boy named Chad Ludington; they couldn't do any better if they were trying to do a parody soap opera.
Party at Brett's place, tomorrow night!
