We elected trump knowing he was bad with women and knew he's cheated on his previous wives. It's something to consider in an election but unless there's evidence he's broken a law, this isn't really news.
We elected trump knowing he was bad with women and knew he's cheated on his previous wives. It's something to consider in an election but unless there's evidence he's broken a law, this isn't really news.
But i don't like him so this is a big deal that didn't happen in the white house . but the little blue dress thing in the oval office was totally fine we loved him
[This message has been edited by fierobrian (edited 03-19-2018).]
While I have serious doubts about this alledged affair, to be honest, I feel the same way about this as I did the Monica and Bill situation. If it did occur, it's something the first lady and the Donald need to work out. Not really any of my business. The media hates President Trump, he hasn't helped himself with his initial meeting with them and his tweeting crap but, that's the way he rolls. The exception, the Donald has not lied under oath about it.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, The Clintons are a cancer on this country. Anyone paying them homage or respect is simply ignoring what they have done.
------------------ Rams
Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun.... Open your frigg'n minds, think about all the other tools that can be made into WMDs.
My wife told me to grow up. I told her to get out of my fort!
I've said it before and I'll say it again, The Clintons are a cancer on this planet. Anyone paying them homage or respect is simply ignoring what they have done.
FTFY
If they were confined to the USA, they would be your problem. They arent and they are everybody's problem.
[This message has been edited by MidEngineManiac (edited 03-19-2018).]
Originally posted by blackrams: The exception, the Donald has not lied under oath about it.
A couple more points:
1) The alleged affair happened over a decade before President Trump was elected. In contrast, Bill Clinton was engaging in "extramarital activities" in the White House.
2) Stormy isn't accusing President Trump of sexual assault. She's just complaining about having to sign a NDA. On the other hand, Bill Clinton was accused of sexual assault by several women.
Of course, there's a big difference between infidelity and sexual assault. Although if it were true that President Trump had an affair with Stormy Daniels, then I'd think he's kind of sleazy for tapping that. But Bill Clinton was a sexual predator. Big difference.
[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 03-19-2018).]
We elected trump knowing he was bad with women and knew he's cheated on his previous wives. It's something to consider in an election but unless there's evidence he's broken a law, this isn't really news.
Hell, before he was president, he was a millionaire playboy. It's almost expected behavior.
I hope she runs her mouth. I hope Trump takes every penny she makes for the next 40 years.
If you can't stand the heat, get out of her kitchen.
Not sure what that would suggest in this context, but it seems like something that someone may or may not have already said, or could yet say about this, or may already be saying it somewhere at this very moment.
How's that for insight?
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 03-19-2018).]
If you can't stand the heat, get out of her kitchen.
Not sure what that would suggest in this context, but it seems like something that someone may or may not have already said, or could yet say about this, or may already be saying it somewhere at this very moment.
Its clear enough to me. The one who stands to gain money and publicity is the liar. Ive also said IFhe DID have sex with her, its not illegal to cheat on your wife. The only people its any business off is a man, his wife and the other person. Its no one elses business at all.
News today is that Stormy passed a lie detector test...
Like there's any chance of getting an accurate reading thru all that silicone
"The New York Daily News reported Tuesday that it had obtained a copy of the polygraph test, which Stormy Daniels took in May 2011 at a doctor’s office in Las Vegas."
Um...ok, sure.......
[This message has been edited by randye (edited 03-20-2018).]
There is another dumb as a box of rocks Playboy cover girl suing some entity over President Trump.
Yahoo News, for all the shat that you thought you never needed.
This nation needs a good case of "suck it up buttercup" as far as I am concerned.
For just under $20 you can get a GorillaR brand drywall carrying device. Or, you could go to any urban area and easily find a slut willing to give out blowjobs for the same price. Choices. We have choices. (I pay for neither. I can do both with my very own two hands for 100% less the cost. And without risk of looking like a fool, or getting hairpiece.
Its clear enough to me. The one who stands to gain money and publicity is the liar. Ive also said IFhe DID have sex with her, its not illegal to cheat on your wife. The only people its any business off is a man, his wife and the other person. Its no one elses business at all.
Adultery is still illegal in many states. Felony in some.
One of the highlights of their affair was the evening when they were outdoors, just after sunset, and had a clear view, looking towards the west, of the Zodiacal Light. It was just about this time of year. Stormy said "Donald, look at that. It's the False Dawn."
Donald said "Stormy, that's actually sunlight, reflected by countless numbers of dust grain-sized particles that are always orbiting around the sun, just like the earth that we're standing on orbits around the sun."
Stormy said "Donald, you're such a non-romantic douchebag."
Originally posted by Tony Kania: For just under $20 you can get a GorillaR brand drywall carrying device. Or, you could go to any urban area and easily find a slut willing to give out blowjobs for the same price. Choices. We have choices. (I pay for neither. I can do both with my very own two hands for 100% less the cost. And without risk of looking like a fool, or getting hairpiece.
Tony, would you like to reconsider that statement (hint hint) ?
I was just thinking, that the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton--which did not end with his conviction and removal from office--could be kind of a "gift" from history to Donald Trump.
Ken Starr investigates the Clintons for possible crimes related to "Whitewater". Financial or white collar crimes. Comes up empty on that score, but finally finds his way to charging Bill Clinton with perjury and obstruction of justice (right? I'm not fact checking) related to his sexual dalliances.
House of Representatives passes a bill of impeachment charges against President Clinton, but after his five day long trial in the Senate, the Senate does not produce the two-thirds majority that would have been required to convict him and remove him from office.
Trump supporters can look at this precedent. If something similar comes out of these lawsuits involving the Trump "women"--Stormy Daniels, Summer Zervos and Karen McGougal--is it then likely that the members of Congress and other power-brokers and influential people will be saying "OK, but why go down that same road again, which did not end with the conviction of President Clinton on the charges of impeachment that were put against him?"
What I would like to know, if it's OK, is whether olejoedad (or anyone else) thinks that there is any kind of factual error in my previous message? I said that I wasn't fact checking, but are the statements that I presented as facts, actually facts?
