| | | quote | Originally posted by randye:
Sorry.
No islam or muslims Shadeball.
Nothing for you to obsess over and post endless screeds about.
Nothing for you to start threads attacking MEM about.
Just an 18 year old kid with serious mental illness . . . |
|
Very good, Mr. Condescension. You just saved me the trouble of revisiting and reading beyond the first paragraph of the report that I posted from the Chicago Tribune. I did not have to read beyond the very first paragraph to know with certainty that I was already in the MidEngineManiac (MEM) Zone.
There is not any kind of attack psychology going on here (not on my part), against MEM, or against Pennock's
premier Canadian correspondent, as I sometimes like to say.
This is without question the kind of news that MEM likes to post with remarkable regularity, regardless of whether the Muslim "angle" in the story is real in any sense, or just a faked-up idea to be used as an alibi. MEM "runs" with this media report, either way. It's right up his alley. Good for another new MEM-originated forum thread. No sin in that. No large sin, at any rate.
Screeds? Screeds from "rinselberg"..? No, screeds are actually a
randye specialty. Your ceaseless efforts to misrepresent the Red State vs Blue State tribalism that dominates the U.S. political landscape--to misrepresent
that current and multi-layered reality with your vacuous, ideologically precious, no relation to anything tangible kind of nonsense in which the only alternatives are "Lay down like a dog and submit to the
randye", or "Beg to differ with the
randye on any point, however minor or ancillary, and so be vilified in
randye world as a no good Marxist-loving Muslim--or Muslim-loving Marxist." The
randye is all about the screed. You are way over the Screed Limit. Way beyond the high end of the radar gun that measures screed.
Do you remember (?) the time when we were on the subject of Iran--something a guy was saying, an Iranian guy--and you missed the indirect but unmistakable reference that he made--it was apparent from the context--to the ouster of Iran's prime minister in 1953. When the Shah of Iran, capitulating to pressure from the Eisenhower administration and the United Kingdom, dismissed Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and named General Fazlollah Zahedi to replace him.
Anyone with a grasp of Iran's post World War Two history would have understood that reference. But you were stuck on the idea that it was a reference to the Iranian Revolution of 1978-79 that made Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini a shoo-in for the Islamic Hall of Shame. Even though that didn't make any sense in the context of the discussion.
I could probably unearth those posts.
I am not obsessed with Islam, or with Muslims. You are obsessed with the idea that I am obsessed with Islam and Muslims. You have tried, persistently but unsuccessfully, to
gaslight me about this. I don't think it's a conscious effort on your part. It's a consequence of your inability to see your own online or Internet persona in a mirror, in all of its ugliness; a consequence of your superabundant urge to
project the psychological deficiencies of your noxious Internet persona onto anyone with a different perspective. Specific examples with clear, evidentiary value from the archives of Pennock's can be provided.
It's easy to understand why you are "bigly" Anti-Anti-Trump, or Anti
2-Trump. (Notation that I may have invented; I've not seen it elsewhere.) Two peas in a pod. Talk a lot of bulls**t and never consider the possibility that you don't know everything there is to know about whatever topic is up for discussion. In that respect, Donald Trump and Pennock's "randye"
are two peas in a pod.
HAGO.
[This message has been edited by rinselberg (edited 05-24-2017).]
