| quote | Originally posted by Blacktree:
My timing chain guide was able to fit without modification. Although, I've heard from others that modification was needed because of interference with the Cloyes timing gear.
That said, I would definitely prefer a modified chain guide to none at all. That guide controls "flapping" of the timing chain. And a flapping chain is bad. |
|
So far I have taken apart a 2.8 and a 3.1s, and the chain slack was huge on both engines; that's what convinced me I needed the double-roller.
I'm concerned that the part is weakened, so if the side breaks off, then it can wedge between the chain and sprocket, and do some serious damage.
I assume that the flapping is minimal when the chain is new and tight, so the guide becomes more useful as the chain gets stretched. However, we don't know how fast the double-roller chain stretches. Since we don't know how fast the roller chain stretches, it's hard to justify having no guide at all.
| quote | Originally posted by La fiera:
On mine I had to file/grind the sides where the chain rides on to make it fit right. I believe that is machining error but you should be OK! I have the same one in my 3.4 Supernatural. The stock set on the 2.8 with less than 500 miles was stretch quite a bit that's why I decided to go with the Cloyes Double Roller!
|
|
I don't think I have a part manufacturing error, it's just mean to be used with the silent chain sprocket, not the double-roller sprocket.
I ordered another guide; I'm going to see if I can remove just the overmolded plastic, while leaving the steel lip behind.
Hopefully this way I can control the flapping, while being confident that the guide won't break apart.
I will fully remove the overmolded plastic layer lip. I think it's asking for trouble to leave a thin skin of the plastic on the steel; this could detach and get wedged somewhere.