Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Technical Discussion & Questions
  3.4L intake question

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


next newest topic | next oldest topic
3.4L intake question by retroman
Started on: 10-27-2013 11:06 PM
Replies: 7 (305 views)
Last post by: MulletproofMonk on 11-02-2013 09:46 PM
retroman
Member
Posts: 470
From: Brookings, SD but originally from Massillon, OH
Registered: Oct 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post10-27-2013 11:06 PM Click Here to See the Profile for retromanSend a Private Message to retromanEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Some of you may know that I've been working on a 3.4 swap for awhile. I am going DIS and using most of the F-body components. Something that I have found with the 3.4 upper intake is that it interferes with the 2.8 thermostat housing. I fixed that by switching to the 3.4 housing, but even then I had to grind it down a little. I then discovered that the coolant temp sensor was in the way. I haven't seen anything on this forum to note this, so first off, has anyone actually used 3.4 intake on their swap, and second if so, where is the best place to relocate the temp sensor?
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
82-T/A [At Work]
Member
Posts: 22730
From: Florida USA
Registered: Aug 2002


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 198
Rate this member

Report this Post11-01-2013 02:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 82-T/A [At Work]Send a Private Message to 82-T/A [At Work]Edit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by retroman:

Some of you may know that I've been working on a 3.4 swap for awhile. I am going DIS and using most of the F-body components. Something that I have found with the 3.4 upper intake is that it interferes with the 2.8 thermostat housing. I fixed that by switching to the 3.4 housing, but even then I had to grind it down a little. I then discovered that the coolant temp sensor was in the way. I haven't seen anything on this forum to note this, so first off, has anyone actually used 3.4 intake on their swap, and second if so, where is the best place to relocate the temp sensor?



I think most people don't use it because it faces the wrong direction for proper air inlet from the drivers side. I always wondered if you could simply rotate it 180 degrees (so that it would be facing backwards in the Camaro / Firebird)? Do the runners line up?
IP: Logged
retroman
Member
Posts: 470
From: Brookings, SD but originally from Massillon, OH
Registered: Oct 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-01-2013 03:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for retromanSend a Private Message to retromanEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
I did flip it 180 degrees because the TB had clearance issues with the deck lid hinge. The runners do line up when reversed to face the standard Fiero direction, but you need to use the 3.4 thermostat housing as the 2.8 neck will not work. Even with the 3.4 housing I had to pound the top flat and grind it down a little. That leaves relocating the coolant temp sensor which I now think will be moved to the side of the water jacket. If only I had realized this before I put the motor in... Also I should note that because I am going DIS the usual distributor clearance issue is not a problem.
IP: Logged
Raydar
Member
Posts: 40721
From: Carrollton GA. Out in the... country.
Registered: Oct 1999


Feedback score:    (13)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 460
Rate this member

Report this Post11-01-2013 10:34 PM Click Here to See the Profile for RaydarSend a Private Message to RaydarEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Which coolant temp sensor is in the way? The one for the ECM faces the shock tower.
The ones that stick straight up are the cold start switch and the fan switch.

Since you're going DIS, is it safe to assume you're going 7730?
If so, you can probably delete the cold start temperature switch and cold start injector. (I kept the stock ECM and did away with my CSI anyway.)
If the fan is controlled by the ECM (i don't know if that's the case or not) you can eliminate that switch too.

If you're using the Camarobird ECM, I'm pretty sure it deletes the CSI. Not sure about the fan switch.

[This message has been edited by Raydar (edited 11-01-2013).]

IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post11-02-2013 09:57 AM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
Are you using the F-body lower intake? If not, then you probably should.

Also, which ECM are you using?
IP: Logged
retroman
Member
Posts: 470
From: Brookings, SD but originally from Massillon, OH
Registered: Oct 2010


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post11-02-2013 12:14 PM Click Here to See the Profile for retromanSend a Private Message to retromanEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Blacktree:

Are you using the F-body lower intake? If not, then you probably should.

Also, which ECM are you using?


I am using the F-body lower intake as the lower Fiero intake will only work with the stock 2.8 upper. I have also swapped to a 7730 ECM.
IP: Logged
Blacktree
Member
Posts: 20770
From: Central Florida
Registered: Dec 2001


Feedback score:    (12)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 350
Rate this member

Report this Post11-02-2013 03:03 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BlacktreeClick Here to visit Blacktree's HomePageSend a Private Message to BlacktreeEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
And which coolant sensor are you referring to? The cold start switch and fan switch (both of which are on the lower intake on the Fiero) can go bye-bye. So all you have left are the ECM temp sensor (which sticks out of the lower intake horizontally, just above the water pump) and the gauge sender (which is on the corner of the cyl head). Are one of these two causing an interference issue?
IP: Logged
MulletproofMonk
Member
Posts: 3079
From: Dayton, OH (Bellbrook, OH 45305)
Registered: Oct 2005


Feedback score:    (50)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 78
Rate this member

Report this Post11-02-2013 09:46 PM Click Here to See the Profile for MulletproofMonkClick Here to visit MulletproofMonk's HomePageSend a Private Message to MulletproofMonkEdit/Delete MessageReply w/QuoteDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by retroman:

Some of you may know that I've been working on a 3.4 swap for awhile. I am going DIS and using most of the F-body components. Something that I have found with the 3.4 upper intake is that it interferes with the 2.8 thermostat housing. I fixed that by switching to the 3.4 housing, but even then I had to grind it down a little. I then discovered that the coolant temp sensor was in the way. I haven't seen anything on this forum to note this, so first off, has anyone actually used 3.4 intake on their swap, and second if so, where is the best place to relocate the temp sensor?


Post a picture. It will make it easier for people to help you out...

------------------
-Brian

My 87 GT Poly Suspension Upgrade (all pics) thread
Removing the roof panel
My HUD install thread
Modified stock air canister and base to 3.5 inch for 3800na

Isn't it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture, his mental state but … after a shooting, the problem is the gun?

IP: Logged

next newest topic | next oldest topic

All times are ET (US)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock