Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T - Archive
  Obama agrees to give Russia Britain's nuclear secrets

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Obama agrees to give Russia Britain's nuclear secrets by loafer87gt
Started on: 02-06-2011 11:53 PM
Replies: 26
Last post by: ray b on 02-08-2011 12:51 PM
loafer87gt
Member
Posts: 5477
From: Canada
Registered: Aug 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 162
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2011 11:53 PM Click Here to See the Profile for loafer87gtSend a Private Message to loafer87gtDirect Link to This Post
With friends like Obama, who needs enemies. Apparently as part of Obama's efforts to get Russia on board with the anti-nuclear weapons treaty, he agreed to give the Reds confidential details of Britain's nuclear capability. Sometimes I wonder just whose side your president is on.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/...uclear-secrets.html#

[This message has been edited by loafer87gt (edited 02-07-2011).]

IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
dennis_6
Member
Posts: 7196
From: between here and there
Registered: Aug 2001


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 115
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2011 11:56 PM Click Here to See the Profile for dennis_6Send a Private Message to dennis_6Direct Link to This Post
The red side.
IP: Logged
twofatguys
Member
Posts: 16465
From: Wheaton Mo. / Virginia Beach Va.
Registered: Jul 2004


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 227
Rate this member

Report this Post02-06-2011 11:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for twofatguysClick Here to Email twofatguysSend a Private Message to twofatguysDirect Link to This Post
I'm having a hard time believing this at all.

Brad
IP: Logged
loafer87gt
Member
Posts: 5477
From: Canada
Registered: Aug 99


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 162
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 12:06 AM Click Here to See the Profile for loafer87gtSend a Private Message to loafer87gtDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by twofatguys:

I'm having a hard time believing this at all.

Brad


Why is that? Do a search on google for "US Britain nuclear" and you will find a slew of links about Obama's betrayal.

The guy is not only grossly incompetant, he is also a menace, plain and simple.
IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 12:17 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by dennis_6:

The red side.


try to keep up
there is no USSR any more
and the russians are no longer REDS
IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 12:38 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post
Britain's nuclear secrets in this case are property of the maker the good old USA
we supply the sub plans the rocket and the warheads to the brits

so we gave the russians who are not reds our own data not anything made by the brits
and treatys limiting nukes are nothing new or different inc such data exchanges

cold wars over we won [thanks to the russian and eastern euro people who beat the reds]

or just yet another set of BIG LIES from the neo-conned
you guys are one trick ponys

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 555
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 12:42 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ray b:
cold wars over we won [thanks to the russian and eastern euro people who beat the reds]


Priceless.
IP: Logged
Zeb
Member
Posts: 4607
From: New Jersey
Registered: Jan 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 53
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 01:02 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ZebSend a Private Message to ZebDirect Link to This Post
I think there's an easy way to deal with this. Just claim we "lost" the paperwork listing all the serial numbers of the missiles/warheads.

So we ask the Brits if we can check them to recover the data.

OOPS! All the serial numbers are filed off. So sorry, lads.

Gee, Ivan, we'd LOVE to tell you, but there's just NO WAY to be sure those Limey's weren't playing some shell game with us, ya know?
IP: Logged
Uaana
Member
Posts: 6570
From: Robbinsdale MN US
Registered: Dec 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 138
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 01:04 PM Click Here to See the Profile for UaanaClick Here to visit Uaana's HomePageClick Here to Email UaanaSend a Private Message to UaanaDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ray b:

Britain's nuclear secrets in this case are property of the maker the good old USA
we supply the sub plans the rocket and the warheads to the brits

so we gave the russians who are not reds our own data not anything made by the brits
and treatys limiting nukes are nothing new or different inc such data exchanges

cold wars over we won [thanks to the russian and eastern euro people who beat the reds]

or just yet another set of BIG LIES from the neo-conned
you guys are one trick ponys



Guys like Putin have to just love you.. "Useful idiot".
IP: Logged
Doug85GT
Member
Posts: 9261
From: Sacramento CA USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 120
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 03:41 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Doug85GTSend a Private Message to Doug85GTDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ray b:

Britain's nuclear secrets in this case are property of the maker the good old USA
we supply the sub plans the rocket and the warheads to the brits

so we gave the russians who are not reds our own data not anything made by the brits
and treatys limiting nukes are nothing new or different inc such data exchanges

cold wars over we won [thanks to the russian and eastern euro people who beat the reds]

or just yet another set of BIG LIES from the neo-conned
you guys are one trick ponys




The US should not be giving ANY ally's nuclear secrets to ANY other country. That means we should not tell the French how many missile we sell to the UK either. This is not a hard concept to understand.
IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29541
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 341
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 03:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianClick Here to Email PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
lol
so - which one of ya think "russia" cannot make nuclear weapons?
what secrets? doesnt sound like any secrets at all.
capabilities. thats it.
and - how accurate you think this info actually will be?
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
maryjane
Member
Posts: 65985
From: Cleveland Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 04:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneDirect Link to This Post
Which of ya thinks it has anything at all to do with whether or not Russia or any other nation "can" make their own?
[no one raises their hands] because it does not. It has to do with capabilities as they fit with Great Britian's overal defense posture and offensive capability. IOW, how they (GB) might or might not deploy and implement use of such weapons. Moreso, it has to do with the signal Obama (or any other POTUS) sends during the course of such negotiations--that is--whether one is negotiating from a position of strength, implied strength, weakness or implied weakness.
IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 07:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post



from wicki

''''''USA and USSR/RF arms limitation treaties

* Treaty banning Nuclear Weapon Tests In The Atmosphere, In Outer Space And Under Water (also known as the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (NTBT), Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT), or Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT)), 1963. Also put forth by Kennedy; banned nuclear tests in the atmosphere, underwater and in space. However, neither France nor China (both Nuclear Weapon States) signed.
* Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): 1968. Established the U.S., USSR, UK, France, and China as five "Nuclear-Weapon States". Non-Nuclear Weapon states were prohibited from (among other things) possessing, manufacturing, or acquiring nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. All 187 signatories were committed to the goal of (eventual) nuclear disarmament.
* Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM): 1972. Entered into between the U.S. and USSR to limit the anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems used in defending areas against missile-delivered nuclear weapons; ended by the US in 2002.
* Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties I & II (SALT I & II): 1972 / 1979. Limited the growth of US and Soviet missile arsenals.
* Prevention of Nuclear War Agreement: 1973. Committed the U.S. and USSR to consult with one another during conditions of nuclear confrontation.
* Threshold Test Ban Treaty: 1974. Capped Nuclear tests at 150 kilotons.
* Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF): 1987. Eliminated nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with intermediate ranges, defined as between 500-5,500 km (300-3,400 miles)
* Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty I (START I): 1991. This was signed by George H. W. Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev; reduced the numbers of U.S. and Soviet long-range missiles and nuclear warheads from 10,000 per side to 6,000 per side.
* Mutual Detargeting Treaty (MDT): 1994. U.S. and Russian missiles no longer automatically target the other country; nuclear forces are no longer operated in a manner that presumes that the two nations are adversaries.
* Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty II (START II]: 1993. Will reduce the numbers of U.S. and Russian long-range missiles and nuclear warheads from 6,000 per side to 3,500-3,000 per side. (START III proposed for 2007).
* Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) 1996. Prohibits all nuclear test explosions in all environments; signed by 180 states, and ratified by 148. The United States has signed, but not ratified, the CTBT.
* Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty (SORT/Moscow Treaty (2002)). Established bilateral strategic nuclear arms reductions and a new "strategic nuclear framework"; also invited all countries to adopt non-proliferation principles aimed at preventing terrorists, or those that harbored them, from acquiring or developing all types of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and related materials, equipment, and technology.
* New START (2010): A follow-up to START I, the treaty was signed at President Barack Obama and President Dmitry Medvedev in Prague on April 8, 2010, and ratified by the United States Senate on December 22, 2010. Ratification is pending in the Federal Assembly of Russia. The treaty would cut the arsenals of both the U.S. and Russia to ~1550 warheads each.'['''
'

sorry neo-cons this is a done deal signed and stamped by congress in 2010
got some thing new ??????????
IP: Logged
Doug85GT
Member
Posts: 9261
From: Sacramento CA USA
Registered: May 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 120
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 07:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Doug85GTSend a Private Message to Doug85GTDirect Link to This Post
Having the treaty already signed is more of an indictment of the Obama administration than an exoneration. Obama sold out our closest ally to broker that deal. The fact that the deal went through means that Obama also gave the Russians GB's nuclear secrets.

I find it very strange that you are bragging about a deal brokered on crooked grounds. Would you brag about selling a car if the buyer threw in that they would kill your neighbor's dog for you?
IP: Logged
avengador1
Member
Posts: 35467
From: Orlando, Florida
Registered: Oct 2001


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 572
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 07:55 PM Click Here to See the Profile for avengador1Click Here to Email avengador1Send a Private Message to avengador1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
lol
so - which one of ya think "russia" cannot make nuclear weapons?
what secrets? doesnt sound like any secrets at all.
capabilities. thats it.
and - how accurate you think this info actually will be?


I think the secrets they are talking about are what kind of nuclear weapons they have, how many do they have, where are they located, and what are they aimed at, not how to make them. They already know how to do that.

[This message has been edited by avengador1 (edited 02-07-2011).]

IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 08:28 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post
russia with our prodding and cash
collected all the nukes the 'stann's ' and others had
and destroyed them
that is good and nuts are far less likely to get nukes or materials now
BUT we didnot take back or limit what we had given the brits like they did their guys
we just counted and typed the nukes in the agreement [sub launched tridents ]

btw most all this was agreed to by BuSh2 people as these treatys take years to work out
oboma just signed what was worked out years ago

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

IP: Logged
htexans1
Member
Posts: 9064
From: Clear Lake City/Houston TX
Registered: Sep 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 118
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 08:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for htexans1Click Here to Email htexans1Send a Private Message to htexans1Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ray b:


try to keep up
there is no USSR any more
and the russians are no longer REDS


China is still RED, last time I checked.

Most of what the annoited one gives to Russia, winds up in China.

[This message has been edited by htexans1 (edited 02-07-2011).]

IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-07-2011 10:11 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post
so there are still reds under the beds
but they magically morphed from russians to chinese
but never fear we still got reds under the beds

come on
IP: Logged
maryjane
Member
Posts: 65985
From: Cleveland Texas
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: (4)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 442
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 09:24 AM Click Here to See the Profile for maryjaneSend a Private Message to maryjaneDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by ray b:

so there are still reds under the beds
but they magically morphed from russians to chinese
but never fear we still got reds under the beds

come on


Having read some of your replys over the years, regarding the Cuban missile crisis, it's ironic, that you were not quite so quick to make light of the Reds living under Fidel's bed during that time period.
IP: Logged
InTheLead
Member
Posts: 2161
From:
Registered: May 2006


Feedback score:    (7)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 10:09 AM Click Here to See the Profile for InTheLeadSend a Private Message to InTheLeadDirect Link to This Post
He supported Obama so he'll say or do anything to qualify his stupidity, and Obamas, now.
IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29541
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 341
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 10:27 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianClick Here to Email PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
so - does this mean the Russia (or anyone else, like China) should be able to sells it nukes to whomever, and NOT tell us who, and how many?

because that is what is being implied here - that nuke dealing should be a big secret. is that the case?

while I agree that probably IS in fact the case, and there are many more nukes which have been secretly sold to nations, and maybe even privately, that noone knows about. Is this the world you choose? because that is what you are argueing for. do we want nuke deals above the table or under the table?

tho - I understand the quest to make everything one sided - ours - but - that world doesnt exist anymore. we gave that away to asia. China gets to do all the one-sided dealings now.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
heybjorn
Member
Posts: 10079
From: pace fl
Registered: Apr 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 97
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 10:29 AM Click Here to See the Profile for heybjornClick Here to Email heybjornSend a Private Message to heybjornDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:

Having read some of your replys over the years, regarding the Cuban missile crisis, it's ironic, that you were not quite so quick to make light of the Reds living in Fidel's bed during that time period.


Fixed that for ya, mj.

IP: Logged
IFLYR22
Member
Posts: 1775
From: Tucson, AZ.
Registered: May 2007


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 11:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for IFLYR22Click Here to Email IFLYR22Send a Private Message to IFLYR22Direct Link to This Post
Seems to me that the point was lost.
If BHO is going to give ally "secrets" (or any information that they trust us to keep) to a non ally, why would our ally then assist us with information we could use if they feel we will eventually give it to a non ally?

How would it matter what political side you sit on as this can break friendships?

-Dave
IP: Logged
nosrac
Member
Posts: 3500
From: Euless, TX, US
Registered: Jan 2005


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 50
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 12:09 PM Click Here to See the Profile for nosracSend a Private Message to nosracDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Pyrthian:

so - does this mean the Russia (or anyone else, like China) should be able to sells it nukes to whomever, and NOT tell us who, and how many?

because that is what is being implied here - that nuke dealing should be a big secret. is that the case?

while I agree that probably IS in fact the case, and there are many more nukes which have been secretly sold to nations, and maybe even privately, that noone knows about. Is this the world you choose? because that is what you are argueing for. do we want nuke deals above the table or under the table?

tho - I understand the quest to make everything one sided - ours - but - that world doesnt exist anymore. we gave that away to asia. China gets to do all the one-sided dealings now.


+ 4 U

Great post, valid points and make you go hmmmm....

IP: Logged
newf
Member
Posts: 8704
From: Canada
Registered: Sep 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 116
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 12:12 PM Click Here to See the Profile for newfSend a Private Message to newfDirect Link to This Post
There are reports that the whole thing is part of the START treaty anyways and this is why you haven't seen this in the "main stream" media.
IP: Logged
Boondawg
Member
Posts: 37924
From: Displaced Alaskan
Registered: Jun 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 337
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 12:37 PM Click Here to See the Profile for BoondawgClick Here to Email BoondawgSend a Private Message to BoondawgDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Pyrthian:


tho - I understand the quest to make everything one sided - ours - .


Which is the one thing I never got.
The decending degrees of evil applied to those below us.

[This message has been edited by Boondawg (edited 02-08-2011).]

IP: Logged
ray b
Member
Posts: 10002
From: miami
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 304
Rate this member

Report this Post02-08-2011 12:51 PM Click Here to See the Profile for ray bClick Here to Email ray bSend a Private Message to ray bDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by maryjane:


Having read some of your replys over the years, regarding the Cuban missile crisis, it's ironic, that you were not quite so quick to make light of the Reds living under Fidel's bed during that time period.


where were you in 62 ?
the crazys almost blew it back then
and I would have been a dead 12 yearold
if the neo-con's of that day had their way

the point being I donot want to rerun the coldwar
like so many on the right do
it is over we won they fell
and all this is about NOT going back to that time

------------------
Question wonder and be wierd
are you kind?

IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery | Ogre's Cave
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock