Pennock's Fiero Forum
  Totally O/T - Archive
  White House Proposal Would Expand Authority of Military Courts

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


White House Proposal Would Expand Authority of Military Courts by Formula88
Started on: 08-02-2006 07:42 PM
Replies: 16
Last post by: larryemory on 08-03-2006 02:43 PM
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 07:42 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101334.html
http://www.civilrights.org/issues/cj/details.cfm?id=45974


"A draft Bush administration plan for special military courts seeks to expand the reach and authority of such "commissions" to include trials, for the first time, of people who are not members of al-Qaeda or the Taliban and are not directly involved in acts of international terrorism, according to officials familiar with the proposal.

The plan, which would replace a military trial system ruled illegal by the Supreme Court in June, would also allow the secretary of defense to add crimes at will to those under the military court's jurisdiction. The two provisions would be likely to put more individuals than previously expected before military juries, officials and independent experts said."


Be sure to exercise your 2nd Amendment rights while you can. You may need them before this is over.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Monkeyman
Member
Posts: 15835
From: Sparta, NC
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 182
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 08:19 PM Click Here to See the Profile for MonkeymanSend a Private Message to MonkeymanDirect Link to This Post
What's the 2nd amendment say? Sorry but I'm a little foggy.
IP: Logged
84Bill
Member
Posts: 21085
From:
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 461
User Banned

Report this Post08-02-2006 08:31 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84BillClick Here to visit 84Bill's HomePageSend a Private Message to 84BillDirect Link to This Post
Too late. My second amendment has already been abridged.

 
quote
Originally posted by Formula88:
Be sure to exercise your 2nd Amendment rights while you can. You may need them before this is over.


IP: Logged
Wichita
Member
Posts: 20699
From: Wichita, Kansas
Registered: Jun 2002


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 326
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 08:33 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WichitaSend a Private Message to WichitaDirect Link to This Post
Enemy Combatants?
IP: Logged
Wolfhound
Member
Posts: 5317
From: Opelika , Alabama, USA
Registered: Oct 1999


Feedback score: (2)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 113
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 08:57 PM Click Here to See the Profile for WolfhoundClick Here to visit Wolfhound's HomePageSend a Private Message to WolfhoundDirect Link to This Post

Doesn't this Allow Rummy dummy to make law?

"would also allow the secretary of defense to add crimes at will to those under the military court's jurisdiction."
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 10:45 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Wichita:

Enemy Combatants?


That would be the key. If you are declared an illegal enemy combatant, you basically lose your Constitutional rights to due process. That's not new. This just expands it's reach.

Remember this article from some months ago?

http://simplyleftbehind.blogspot.com/2006/02/hm-halliburton-homeland-security.html

Halliburton Subsidiary Gets Contract to Add Temporary Immigration Detention Centers


By RACHEL L. SWARNS
Published: February 4, 2006
WASHINGTON, Feb. 3 — The Army Corps of Engineers has awarded a contract worth up to $385 million for building temporary immigration detention centers to Kellogg Brown & Root, the Halliburton subsidiary that has been criticized for overcharging the Pentagon for its work in Iraq.

KBR would build the centers for the Homeland Security Department for an unexpected influx of immigrants, to house people in the event of a natural disaster or for new programs that require additional detention space, company executives said. KBR, which announced the contract last month, had a similar contract with immigration agencies from 2000 to last year.

The contract with the Corps of Engineers runs one year, with four optional one-year extensions. Officials of the corps said that they had solicited bids and that KBR was the lone responder.

IP: Logged
Fastback 86
Member
Posts: 7849
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Sep 2003


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 231
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 11:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for Fastback 86Send a Private Message to Fastback 86Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Monkeyman:

What's the 2nd amendment say? Sorry but I'm a little foggy.


Right to Bear Arms.
IP: Logged
Uaana
Member
Posts: 6570
From: Robbinsdale MN US
Registered: Dec 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 138
Rate this member

Report this Post08-02-2006 11:49 PM Click Here to See the Profile for UaanaClick Here to visit Uaana's HomePageSend a Private Message to UaanaDirect Link to This Post
"That would be the key. If you are declared an illegal enemy combatant, you basically lose your Constitutional rights to due process. That's not new. This just expands it's reach. "

Psst, if you are a foreign national you don't have Constitutional rights. They only apply to US citizens.

As for the usual Halliburton rant, do you have any idea how big they actually are? The amount of resources and sub contractors they can put in play?
Yes it can look bad on the surface, but with their resources they can usually out bid and actually get a job done on time and on budget (note the usually part)
If this were turned over to a gov't agency it would be over budget and take 10x as long.. BigDig anyone?
IP: Logged
Toddster
Member
Posts: 20871
From: Roswell, Georgia
Registered: May 2001


Feedback score:    (41)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 504
Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 12:07 AM Click Here to See the Profile for ToddsterSend a Private Message to ToddsterDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Uaana:

If this were turned over to a gov't agency it would be over budget and take 10x as long.. BigDig anyone?


Hey! Are you implying that we got screwed on that deal?! [/sarchasm]

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 12:18 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Uaana:

Psst, if you are a foreign national you don't have Constitutional rights. They only apply to US citizens.



You are correct as far as you go. What you neglect is US citizens who are declared enemy combatants do not have Constitutional rights either.

Yaser Esam Hamdi, José Padilla, and John Walker Lindh are examples of how due process for U.S. Citizens can be circumvented if you are declared an enemy combatant.

José Padilla was held for 3 years without being charged. He has since been charged with "conspiracy to murder, kidnap, and maim people overseas." "The U.S. administration has in the past described him as an illegal enemy combatant, arguing that he was thereby not entitled to the normal protection of US law, nor protection under the Geneva Convention."

Yaser Esam Hamdi was held for 3 years without being charged and denied legal representation. Finally in 2004 the SCOTUS said charge him or release him. He had dual citizenship with the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. He was released to Saudi Arabia and forced to give up his U.S. citizenship.

Only Lindh was convicted and that was on a plea bargain.

People may dismiss these three as bad examples because they're "evil" or "they were terrorists" or whatever. But they were all American citizens. Timothy McVeigh had his day in court and was convicted by a jury of his peers. What's the difference? And, if you think of a reason there's a difference - ask yourself if there SHOULD be a difference.
IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 12:20 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post

Formula88

53788 posts
Member since Jan 2001
 
quote
Originally posted by Uaana:

As for the usual Halliburton rant, do you have any idea how big they actually are? The amount of resources and sub contractors they can put in play?


Actually, I personally don't give a damn WHO builds the detention centers. The issue, IMO, is the perceived need for these centers, not who won the contract.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
84Bill
Member
Posts: 21085
From:
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 461
User Banned

Report this Post08-03-2006 02:40 AM Click Here to See the Profile for 84BillClick Here to visit 84Bill's HomePageSend a Private Message to 84BillDirect Link to This Post
Todd... You are such a government (bend over because I like being ****ed up the ass ) lackie it's no wonder.

[This message has been edited by 84Bill (edited 08-03-2006).]

IP: Logged
cccharlie
Member
Posts: 2006
From: North Smithfield, RI
Registered: Jan 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 65
Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 04:29 AM Click Here to See the Profile for cccharlieSend a Private Message to cccharlieDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Toddster:


Hey! Are you implying that we got screwed on that deal?! [/sarchasm]


Apparently its okay to recklessly spend billions in Iraq, but not in Massachusetts.

Personally, I prefer pork barrel projects with low mortality rates. And a possible benefit to the people who paid for it.

IMHO - The Republicans and the Democrats should merge and change their name to the Keynesians.
IP: Logged
under8ted
Member
Posts: 1108
From: Sparta, ON, Canada
Registered: Mar 2006


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 184
User Banned

Report this Post08-03-2006 06:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for under8tedSend a Private Message to under8tedDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by Uaana:


Psst, if you are a foreign national you don't have Constitutional rights. They only apply to US citizens.



The coupled, coupled with the US regimes propensity for walking wherever they want on the planet and ignoring foriegn soveriegnty in the process to get at whatever they deem "enemy combatants" makes this new twist on scary thing for the entire planet. In fact, the US government has NEVER shown anything, globally, but an extreme willingness to shove thier foriegn policy and internal politics down the plants throught by brute force. Defending thier country internally and at the border is one matter (which any sane person would find perfectly acceptable). Walking into a foriegn country under the banner "War on -insert current cause here-" is a whole different ball game.

I dont have the link, but recall a case a several years ago where a Windsor, ON business owner did business in both the US and Cuba (perfectly legal up here). The Kings (or Slick Willies, dont recall which) regime didnt take kindly to the concept that he was ignoring the US imbargo on Cuba and went after him with everything they had (even though he wasnt a US citizen or resident). By today's USG standards he would be an "Enemy fiscal combatant".

I know (or knew) through work contacts a few individuals who werent adverse to using occult practices (and vocal about it) to try to impede the USG's "policies". My guess is using a ouja board or whatever in an "unaproved manner" now makes one an "emeny combatant."

The only bright side I see is that Georgie-Boys second term is getting short, so he will be gone for good. Unfortunatley, those "behind the scenes" who pull the strings arent term-limited, so the best we can hope for is whatever new regime is installed has some mitigating influence on BushCo's insanity.

IP: Logged
Formula88
Member
Posts: 53788
From: Raleigh NC
Registered: Jan 2001


Feedback score: (3)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 554
Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 10:34 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Formula88Send a Private Message to Formula88Direct Link to This Post
sarchasm - the vast chasm of thought that exists between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

(Assuming, of course, Todd didn't just misspell sarcasm.)
IP: Logged
84Bill
Member
Posts: 21085
From:
Registered: Apr 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 461
User Banned

Report this Post08-03-2006 12:05 PM Click Here to See the Profile for 84BillClick Here to visit 84Bill's HomePageSend a Private Message to 84BillDirect Link to This Post
I like your post because I feel you "get it" but don't think that juse because Bush and co are leaving office that this ideology will change. The ideology had started long before him and has become increasingly invasive, year by year, administration by admininstration, a chink here and a piece there. There is NO difference between democrat or republican. The fact is they are both pro big business and anti america / american at the same time. We american citizens are nothing more than greese..

The next administration will increase taxes beyond what we are seeing today. Many will loose their homes, cars and way of life. Those that manage to survive will look down on those who can not and gleefuly agree with the hand that feeds them, those who lost were irrisponsible, uneducated idiots and deserve the misery they got.


The more deeply "we the people" are divided, the more strength the USG will have over us to impose it's will, ignore our rights and strip us down to nothing more than ignorant servants.


It is not the right of the government to control the people. It is the right of the people to control the government.
The sad part of it all is there are hardly any people left, just pittifully scared, supposedly educated bobble headed "yes" men who have "too much to loose". How right they are when one sees how many of our rights have been lost.

 
quote
Originally posted by under8ted:
The only bright side I see is that Georgie-Boys second term is getting short, so he will be gone for good. Unfortunatley, those "behind the scenes" who pull the strings arent term-limited, so the best we can hope for is whatever new regime is installed has some mitigating influence on BushCo's insanity.


IP: Logged
larryemory
Member
Posts: 838
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Registered: Jan 2003


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post08-03-2006 02:43 PM Click Here to See the Profile for larryemorySend a Private Message to larryemoryDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by 84Bill:

I like your post because I feel you "get it" but don't think that juse because Bush and co are leaving office that this ideology will change. The ideology had started long before him and has become increasingly invasive, year by year, administration by admininstration, a chink here and a piece there. There is NO difference between democrat or republican. The fact is they are both pro big business and anti america / american at the same time. We american citizens are nothing more than greese..

The next administration will increase taxes beyond what we are seeing today. Many will loose their homes, cars and way of life. Those that manage to survive will look down on those who can not and gleefuly agree with the hand that feeds them, those who lost were irrisponsible, uneducated idiots and deserve the misery they got.


The more deeply "we the people" are divided, the more strength the USG will have over us to impose it's will, ignore our rights and strip us down to nothing more than ignorant servants.


It is not the right of the government to control the people. It is the right of the people to control the government.
The sad part of it all is there are hardly any people left, just pittifully scared, supposedly educated bobble headed "yes" men who have "too much to loose". How right they are when one sees how many of our rights have been lost.


Bill, You're slipping. You sound downright sensible.
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock