Pennock's Fiero Forum
  General Fiero Chat - Archive
  Any reason to make a 3.4/3400 hybrid for a fiero?

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Email This Page to Someone! | Printable Version


Any reason to make a 3.4/3400 hybrid for a fiero? by notsonic
Started on: 07-15-2010 10:50 PM
Replies: 13
Last post by: Tinkrr on 07-16-2010 03:19 PM
notsonic
Member
Posts: 92
From: woodbridge, nj, usa
Registered: Oct 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-15-2010 10:50 PM Click Here to See the Profile for notsonicSend a Private Message to notsonicDirect Link to This Post
this is probably a stupid question.

the two engines im referring to are the fbody iron head/block 3.4l and the newer aluminum head 3400 engine in fwd setups.

does a 3400 just drop right into a fiero?

i have the whole 3400 top end as i was going to build the hybrid for my camaro (thinking back, what was the issue with using the fwd engine in an fbody, i guess the trans.)

what trans would you use with the 3400 in a fiero, would the stock fiero one work or the one that wouldve been stock with the 3400?

so is there any point in having the top end to build a hybrid or should i just sell it all? i really dont think ill be doing it for my camaro id rather just get an lsx at this point. i also dont really want to pull the 3.4 out of my camaro and rebuild it for the fiero as it has 196k on it and low oil pressure. not sure itd be worth it, could just pick up a junkyard 3.4 or 3400 really.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
Sourmug
Member
Posts: 4538
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Sep 2002


Feedback score:    (29)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 144
Rate this member

Report this Post07-15-2010 11:29 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SourmugSend a Private Message to SourmugDirect Link to This Post
Here's a link to Fierosound's site. I think it's worth it.

http://www.fierosound.com/34engine/3400details.htm

Enjoy!

Nolan

[This message has been edited by Sourmug (edited 07-15-2010).]

IP: Logged
notsonic
Member
Posts: 92
From: woodbridge, nj, usa
Registered: Oct 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-15-2010 11:35 PM Click Here to See the Profile for notsonicSend a Private Message to notsonicDirect Link to This Post
thats actually the opposite of what i would want to do.

id be using the 3400 (la1) top end on a 3.4l (l32) block.

the aluminum heads/intake flow way better than the iron stuff. i just dont know if theres any reason to use the l32 block over the la1 block in a fiero.
IP: Logged
Sourmug
Member
Posts: 4538
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Registered: Sep 2002


Feedback score:    (29)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 144
Rate this member

Report this Post07-15-2010 11:59 PM Click Here to See the Profile for SourmugSend a Private Message to SourmugDirect Link to This Post
Sorry about that I mis-read your post.

Nolan
IP: Logged
notsonic
Member
Posts: 92
From: woodbridge, nj, usa
Registered: Oct 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 12:03 AM Click Here to See the Profile for notsonicSend a Private Message to notsonicDirect Link to This Post
np man, im just confused.

im guessing the point of building a hybrid is to not have to replace your whole engine. '*shrug*
IP: Logged
Khw
Member
Posts: 11139
From: South Weber, UT. U.S.A.
Registered: Jun 2008


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 134
Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 12:35 AM Click Here to See the Profile for KhwSend a Private Message to KhwDirect Link to This Post
Curious how that would work. Isn't the 3.4 a pushrod engine and the 3400 a overhead cam engine?

I might be mistaken though.

edit: Just checked. It's the LQ1 that's overhead cam.

 
quote
3.4/3400
GM produced three 3.4 L (204 CID/3,350 cc) variants of the 60° block: The L32, a normal large-bore OHV descendant of the 3.1 L (not to be confused with the 90° Series III L32 supercharged), the LA1, and a performance-oriented DOHC version, the LQ1.

[This message has been edited by Khw (edited 07-16-2010).]

IP: Logged
Four_hundred_86
Member
Posts: 656
From: West/Central Texas
Registered: Oct 2008


Feedback score: (1)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 12:48 AM Click Here to See the Profile for Four_hundred_86Send a Private Message to Four_hundred_86Direct Link to This Post
The problem you run into is clearence. The iron head engine has a combustion chamber in the head, but the aluminum heads are designed to combust lower in the chamber. Imo you'll end up with a bad case of piston slap. Also the mounts and bolt pattern line up you need dis and a 7730 comp, but as far as a swap goes its not bad. Ive got a 3100 bolted to an Isuzu trans. Runs great just currently really homing it to a new car. Yay car wrecks.
IP: Logged
IROCTAFIERO
Member
Posts: 791
From: Montgomery, Al USA
Registered: May 2005


Feedback score:    (6)
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 09:10 AM Click Here to See the Profile for IROCTAFIEROSend a Private Message to IROCTAFIERODirect Link to This Post
I personally do NOT think it is worth it. Step up to the complete 3400. Better mileage, driveability, power...the list goes on and on
IP: Logged
dobey
Member
Posts: 11572
From:
Registered: Sep 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 371
User Banned

Report this Post07-16-2010 09:40 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dobeySend a Private Message to dobeyDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by IROCTAFIERO:

I personally do NOT think it is worth it. Step up to the complete 3400. Better mileage, driveability, power...the list goes on and on


Yeah, I don't see any valid reason to not just go full swing. Trying to mix and match parts gets expensive and a pain to deal with. And if you can go all-aluminum, there's no real good reason to keep any of the iron around.
IP: Logged
fierosound
Member
Posts: 15251
From: Calgary, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 287
Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 09:47 AM Click Here to See the Profile for fierosoundClick Here to visit fierosound's HomePageSend a Private Message to fierosoundDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by IROCTAFIERO:

I personally do NOT think it is worth it. Step up to the complete 3400. Better mileage, driveability, power...the list goes on and on


All true... Unless you want to maintain the "factory look" engine (what I wanted at the time).
If I were "doing over" knowing what I know now - I'd go 3800 S/C.


------------------
My World of Wheels Winners (Click on links below)

3.4L Supercharged 87 GT and Super Duty 4 Indy #163

[This message has been edited by fierosound (edited 07-02-2011).]

IP: Logged
dobey
Member
Posts: 11572
From:
Registered: Sep 2001


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 371
User Banned

Report this Post07-16-2010 09:49 AM Click Here to See the Profile for dobeySend a Private Message to dobeyDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:
Unless you want to maintain the "factory look" engine (what I wanted at the time). If I were "doing over" - I'd go 3800 S/C.


I'm 'doing over' but also looking to maintain the 'factory look' in my swap. In other words, I want it to look like it rolled off the line, with the new stuff in it. Not going to be easy, and probably not the cheapest, but it will be fun to get it running.
IP: Logged
PFF
System Bot
notsonic
Member
Posts: 92
From: woodbridge, nj, usa
Registered: Oct 2008


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 10:16 AM Click Here to See the Profile for notsonicSend a Private Message to notsonicDirect Link to This Post
 
quote
Originally posted by fierosound:


All true... Unless you want to maintain the "factory look" engine (what I wanted at the time). If I were "doing over" knowing what I know now - I'd go 3800 S/C.



you wouldve seen a decent performance increase if you had kept the aluminum heads and top end. though with a supercharger its less aparent.

i think the reason people built the hybrid for fbodies is that the oil pain on the 3x00 doesnt fit the camaro cross member. and since its structural you cant really change it. makes sense.

[This message has been edited by notsonic (edited 07-16-2010).]

IP: Logged
Pyrthian
Member
Posts: 29569
From: Detroit, MI
Registered: Jul 2002


Feedback score: (5)
Leave feedback





Total ratings: 342
Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 10:40 AM Click Here to See the Profile for PyrthianSend a Private Message to PyrthianDirect Link to This Post
not worth the effort to do this. you are doing ALOT of work for very little gain.

as mentioned above - the cumbustion areas are different between the iron & alum heads - which norally requires a piston change. I always think an alternate idea is to grind 15CC's out of each cylinder area to make a little more combustion area to accomodate the iron head pistons, and give it a decent bump in compression ratio.

so, now you got alum heads, good flow & higher compression. I think this is a recipe for 250HP 3.4
tho - I dont know if that would compromise the strength of the heads.
IP: Logged
Tinkrr
Member
Posts: 412
From: Whitby,ON, Canada
Registered: Aug 2004


Feedback score: N/A
Leave feedback

Rate this member

Report this Post07-16-2010 03:19 PM Click Here to See the Profile for TinkrrSend a Private Message to TinkrrDirect Link to This Post
You have a PM re: 3400 swap
IP: Logged



All times are ET (US)

T H I S   I S   A N   A R C H I V E D   T O P I C
  

Contact Us | Back To Main Page

Advertizing on PFF | Fiero Parts Vendors
PFF Merchandise | Fiero Gallery
Real-Time Chat | Fiero Related Auctions on eBay



Copyright (c) 1999, C. Pennock