Well i got my tires mounted and balanced on my wheels today, we have a road force balancer, and they came up with excessive road force but either way 265/35/18's fit, from what I can tell just fine. The offset is 35 and it is a 9in rim, the only problem I have is they stick out about 3/4 of an inch on ea side, but I plan on fixing that with a very minute widebody, if things go as planned.
And what I think people would want to see.... the pictures...
And from what I can tell the only thing that would cause a possible issue with rubbing is the spring perch and you can see here that there is quite a gap between the wheel and perch.
Hope this helps anybody looking for wheels, Chris
IP: Logged
02:58 PM
PFF
System Bot
87FieroGTx Member
Posts: 2630 From: Bath, New York, USA Registered: Jun 2001
Coil over's will be happening soon, just got the tires mounted and wanted to put them on. Let me know if I am wrong, but from what I understand the tire and spring perch move together when you hit a bump, so shouldn't the distance between the wheel and the perch never change? coil overs will help to lower the car, but I don't think they are needed to keep from anything rubbing.
Oh and I plan to basically flare the back end along with scoops on the 1/4 panels when i get down to sanding the car to prep for paint.
Maybe I am wrong, but that is what makes sense to me, Chris
I think he was talking about hitting the fender not the perch. Looks good to me, I like wide tires! How does it steer? Is it noticeably harder? Thanks for posting.
IP: Logged
05:14 PM
eph_kay Member
Posts: 943 From: Independence, MO Registered: Apr 2006
I didn't notice it being any harder, I haven't pulled in and out of a parking spot yet, but I have turned the car around on the street to back it into the garage a couple times and it seamed to turn fine, then again, anybody else in my family, even when driving my formula with 195's on it complain about it being hard to steer so I might just not even think about it
Chris
IP: Logged
05:18 PM
madcurl Member
Posts: 21401 From: In a Van down by the Kern River Registered: Jul 2003
Curley, you get any commission from Archie for selling those things? I think I will make one myself, I don't think I need the full width of the mad archie kit, who knows maybe by then I will have the first coupe widebody, even if it is only an inch on ea side
Chris
IP: Logged
05:36 PM
jscott1 Member
Posts: 21676 From: Houston, TX , USA Registered: Dec 2001
Let me know if I am wrong, but from what I understand the tire and spring perch move together when you hit a bump, so shouldn't the distance between the wheel and the perch never change? coil overs will help to lower the car, but I don't think they are needed to keep from anything rubbing.
First part is correct, the wheel and perch move together.
Second part is not as correct. What we can't see in your picture is the horizontal distance between the wheel and the perch. If you have room then fine it won't change, but it could be rubbing. An adjustable coilover doesn't have that large perch and will give more clearance to keep from rubbing. Also, an adjustable coilover will give you the freedom to raise the car or adjust stiffness to keep from rubbing on the fenders.
Adjustable coilovers, are not just for lowering the car. Notice I keep saying "Adjustable" since all McPherson struts technically are coil over shock. When people say coilovers, what they are really saying is Adjustable Coilovers.
IP: Logged
05:41 PM
86_fiero_gt_92 Member
Posts: 452 From: toronto, ontario, canada Registered: Nov 2007
I am not 100% sure since I only have 88's but the fronts on here are 18x7's with a 42 offset and they seam to be a perfect offset, on the rears for them to stick out as much as mine you will need a 35 offset on the 9in rim, going with a greater offset and a coil over you could probably get them to tuck under the fender just fine, but I am unsure, because I know the 88 and pre 88 rear knuckles are differen't, I would assume the offset is different too.
jscott, I have about 1" I would say, in other words I can freely move my finger around between the tire and the strut body/spring perch, I would say it is about an inch, I just went and checked, which should be about the same with coil over's since it is gonna be the same sturt body.
And what I was saying with the "help to lower the car..." was that, the comment about "COIL OVERS!" I don't think they are needed for this tire, but they would help to lower the car to look better, that is what I meant by saying that.
Sorry I worded that funny, Chris
IP: Logged
05:59 PM
madcurl Member
Posts: 21401 From: In a Van down by the Kern River Registered: Jul 2003
Hmm, good to know... I think I'll definetely go to a 265 when my 255 G-Force's are worn out. Happen to know what kind of price difference there is between the sizes?
And it does kind look Dunk-y... I like it
Edit to add: Madcurl, any report on how good those Falken 452s are? They have an excellent treadwear rating and look good, especially considering how relatively inexpensive they are but I couldn't find much of a review on them.
[This message has been edited by pumpkincarriage (edited 02-18-2008).]
IP: Logged
07:13 PM
86_fiero_gt_92 Member
Posts: 452 From: toronto, ontario, canada Registered: Nov 2007
Edit to add: Madcurl, any report on how good those Falken 452s are? They have an excellent treadwear rating and look good, especially considering how relatively inexpensive they are but I couldn't find much of a review on them.
I've purchase Falken tires so I don't know of it's quality or tread wear.
IP: Logged
08:38 PM
Steven Snyder Member
Posts: 3326 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Mar 2004
I don't think they are needed for this tire, but they would help to lower the car to look better, that is what I meant by saying that.
Yeah, you probably have about an inch to come down without any problems. You need about two "Curley sized" fingers between the tire and the fender with stock springs to not have rubbing. Stiffer springs would allow you to come down even further.
I think the 88s might need more offset on the rear than previously advertised. Or a widebody or baby flare.
IP: Logged
10:46 PM
eph_kay Member
Posts: 943 From: Independence, MO Registered: Apr 2006
jscott, I agree that just little bit of a flare would be nice, or go with a widebody, get some medium sized spacer's and get them dished on the inside and they would fit, or get new ones with different offset.
On the springs I plan on running at least a 300, maybe even a 350, I want a stiffer ride and they won't hurt with the added weight of the 3800
I don't see why the 88's would need a different offset for the rear. The rear factory wheels were the same as earlier years. Also the wheel hubs and axles are the same as earlier years, and GM couldn't have increased the track without changing one or more of those... Maybe the 88s have thicker rotor hats than the earlier ones?
IP: Logged
01:17 AM
Alex4mula Member
Posts: 7410 From: Canton, MI US Registered: Dec 1999
Nice rims!! But I'm bias. As I mentioned the alignment may have to do on how much they stick out at the top. I had more camber before so they didn't stick out that much. On last alignment (stock settings) they went out a little. Still nothing that I think is too noticeable for the benefit of traction.
I believe the 88 rears should be a +42 offset to sit flush, my wheels are a +40 (with a 255/35/18) and don't stick out nearly as much.
No need for crazy offsets for the rear of an 88 with 255's. This is my 88 with 255 45 17's and a 35mm offset, BTW the front is 215 45 17 with 40mm offset
------------------
IP: Logged
01:31 PM
eph_kay Member
Posts: 943 From: Independence, MO Registered: Apr 2006
No need for crazy offsets for the rear of an 88 with 255's. This is my 88 with 255 45 17's and a 35mm offset, BTW the front is 215 45 17 with 40mm offset
What's the width of the rim? That and the offset is what matters...
IP: Logged
04:33 AM
Amida Member
Posts: 2361 From: Seattle, WA. USA Registered: Jul 2003
Well i got my tires mounted and balanced on my wheels today, we have a road force balancer, and they came up with excessive road force but either way 265/35/18's fit, from what I can tell just fine. The offset is 35 and it is a 9in rim, the only problem I have is they stick out about 3/4 of an inch on ea side, but I plan on fixing that with a very minute widebody, if things go as planned.
And what I think people would want to see.... the pictures...
Hope this helps anybody looking for wheels, Chris
Are those TSW Kyalami wheels? 18's on front & rear?
[This message has been edited by Amida (edited 02-21-2008).]
IP: Logged
06:05 AM
Amida Member
Posts: 2361 From: Seattle, WA. USA Registered: Jul 2003
No need for crazy offsets for the rear of an 88 with 255's. This is my 88 with 255 45 17's and a 35mm offset, BTW the front is 215 45 17 with 40mm offset
I think , even thought the rear offsets are the same at 35mm, Eph's stick out more because of the 9" width. If you could get th 9" in a 50mm that would be near perfect. This would put the wheel about 3/4" closer to the strut.
IP: Logged
06:15 AM
Rickady88GT Member
Posts: 10649 From: Central CA Registered: Dec 2002
I think , even thought the rear offsets are the same at 35mm, Eph's stick out more because of the 9" width. If you could get th 9" in a 50mm that would be near perfect. This would put the wheel about 3/4" closer to the strut.
I would not use ANY rim tire combo that puts the tire under .5" to the strut. Why, ask GM about the new GTO's with 17" rims on front that had less than .5 clearance. They have MANY tire blowouts on record and who knows how many went unreported. The tire WILL flex even at the top and get closer to the strut as you drive. If the tire touches it cuts the sidewall and BAM. Just because it will fit in without touching does not mean it will drive without touching. Under hard driving that tire will flex and the rim will too. You get what you pay for just imagine the the cheap rims flexing on hard corners. How much, I don't know but I am sure it is not a lot. If you tire is to close to the strut to begin with you cant afford ANY tire/wheel flex.
------------------
IP: Logged
11:42 AM
PFF
System Bot
Rickady88GT Member
Posts: 10649 From: Central CA Registered: Dec 2002
If it's just the spring/seat that's creating the clearance problem then switching to a coilover setup should take care of it. I think I saw some Tenzo 18x9.0x5x100x49mm wheels at Discounttire.
IP: Logged
12:11 PM
Steven Snyder Member
Posts: 3326 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Mar 2004
Originally posted by Rickady88GT: I would not use ANY rim tire combo that puts the tire under .5" to the strut. Why, ask GM about the new GTO's with 17" rims on front that had less than .5 clearance. They have MANY tire blowouts on record and who knows how many went unreported. The tire WILL flex even at the top and get closer to the strut as you drive. If the tire touches it cuts the sidewall and BAM. Just because it will fit in without touching does not mean it will drive without touching. Under hard driving that tire will flex and the rim will too. You get what you pay for just imagine the the cheap rims flexing on hard corners. How much, I don't know but I am sure it is not a lot. If you tire is to close to the strut to begin with you cant afford ANY tire/wheel flex.
Even my Porsche rims (they're STIFF) flexed ~1/16" under LIGHT cornering, to contact the strut (they are 8.5" wide with 55mm offset and are VERY close to the top of the knuckle where the strut mounts). I imagine they flex 1/8" or more at max load. That's just the rim.. the tire is going to move a lot more!