Seems like there's lots of things you can do to the 2.8, but I've never really seen the little iron duke talked about too much here. So, I'm wondering what can be done to it to increase performance, and also where to get the stuff from. Aside from boring it out, and shaving the head, what else can we coupe owners do? Add on's, etc? I mean, we only get 90 something horse from what I understand, I want more.
------------------
[This message has been edited by FieroFanaticus2 (edited 06-14-2006).]
IP: Logged
02:18 AM
PFF
System Bot
Frizlefrak Member
Posts: 2921 From: El Paso, Texas Registered: Aug 2003
The consensus seems to be that the duke isn't worth upgrading. It won't withstand much of a power increase before it comes apart, and engine swaps are much cheaper and provide a better bang for the buck than attempting to upgrade a duke.
There have been dozens of threads regarding increasing the duke's output....none have turned out well.
Sorry....I know it probably isn't what you wanted to hear.
IP: Logged
02:25 AM
sostock Member
Posts: 5907 From: Grain Valley, MO Registered: May 2005
yep, the duke is a commuter engine. it was really good at its time. the bottom end won't handle a turbo. 92-98 hp will get you around ok. you can get a tune up, k and n air filter, gut the cat, synthetic oil, might get you up to 100 hp? good coat of wax to slide down the highway!?
probably be better off with a 2.8, 3.4, 3800sc or a sbc if you want to get well over 100 hp out of your car.
sorry i wish there was something to do.
IP: Logged
03:03 AM
Frizlefrak Member
Posts: 2921 From: El Paso, Texas Registered: Aug 2003
yep, the duke is a commuter engine. it was really good at its time. .
It's important to place things in their context in time. When the duke was built, it had a similar output of most other economy engines of the time. Yes, it's small compared to today's offerings, but in it's time, it was right on par.
If you just want an inexpensive boost in power, swap in a stock 2.8. There are an abundance of them, and for the 85-88 cars, it doesn't take a whole lot of effort...and it's about a 40% increase in power over the duke.
IP: Logged
03:27 AM
Jax184 Member
Posts: 3524 From: Vancouver, Canada Registered: Jun 2005
Like everyone has said, the 'duke is simply not capable of withstanding much more power than it currently produces. If you're concerned about gas mileage but want more power, you might look into the Quad-4. It should give near identical mileage, but 160-190 HP.
IP: Logged
03:40 AM
tutnkmn Member
Posts: 3426 From: York, England, U.K. Living in Ohio Registered: May 2006
Like everyone has said, the 'duke is simply not capable of withstanding much more power than it currently produces. If you're concerned about gas mileage but want more power, you might look into the Quad-4. It should give near identical mileage, but 160-190 HP.
Is the Quad a bolt in replacement? Will it bolt up to the dukes transmission or would he need to change tranny or use a plate? Anyone know of any other GM 4 cylinders that would replace the 2.5 (maybe the 2.0)? I had a 2.0 in a Cavalier that seemed to pull the car well with a 5 speed. Just some thoughts, I haven't messed with 4 poppers much myself except for servicing them at a shop.
IP: Logged
08:07 AM
sanderson Member
Posts: 2203 From: corpus christi, texas, usa Registered: Sep 2001
The best performance upgrade for a duke is advamnce the base timing about three degrees.
The Quad 4 swap is as complicated as any other swap.
The easiest swap is to convert to a 2.8. 3.1 or 3.4 V-6 using all Fiero accessories. This of course assumes thahe car is not an '84 so that a fiero V-6 ecm harness will plugg right in..
IP: Logged
10:32 AM
lou_dias Member
Posts: 5258 From: Warwick, RI Registered: Jun 2000
Not to nit pick, but isnt the duke more like 70whp?
------------------ 1986 GT, LT1/4T60E. In the middle of cam/port, new interior, paint and waiting on new wheels. Itll blow you away!! http://hometown.aol.com/ptfiero/index.html build http://dtcc.cz28.com/Customer/LT1Fiero/index.htm
the engines are weak but things can be done to it to get little power increases. from what I have seen of the fiero duke is that the intake is very restrictive and the stock lift is very far from where the power is. You have the mercury 3.0 crank, sbc pistons and rods, higher ratio rocker arms and a variety of camshafts. Yea the power output of the duke will never be as good as a v6 or v8 and it does take alot of money to make one decently powered but getting 180-200hp will cost ya but the shock factor is worth it. Im in the middle of working on my duke and will be putting the money into machine work and sleeving the block and using the 3.0 crank and hoping for about 3.2 displacment when im done, though going a 3.4 would be better for what I will be using it for but not for the powerband I need it to work at.
IP: Logged
12:29 PM
PFF
System Bot
Jax184 Member
Posts: 3524 From: Vancouver, Canada Registered: Jun 2005
The Quad-4 is a bit of work, but one day I hope to have the money to do it myself. Getting comparible power out of a 'duke would probably cost as much, and give you an engine that still has a laughably weak block and unimpressive gas mileage.
IP: Logged
02:03 PM
jscott1 Member
Posts: 21676 From: Houston, TX , USA Registered: Dec 2001
Yeah the Duke was decent in it's day, you have to remember that small blocks were only making like 170-200 hp in the 80s.
The 4.9 is an awesome upgrade for a duke. Double the horsepower, gobs of torque and not much heavier. Fairly straightforward installation. The 4.9 is not for everybody, but you could drop one in a lot easier than trying to get a duke to run ~200 hp reliably.
IP: Logged
03:12 PM
Philphine Member
Posts: 6136 From: louisville,ky. usa Registered: Feb 2000
take it from someone who's still strugglin' with a couple of dukes himself, just use it for what it is till you can work out something else. everything i've read says a duke is good for about 140hp at best without losing total reliability, about what you'd get from a 2.8 anyway. and having a 2.8 also, putting that kind of money into a duke to equal a 2.8 is not much to aspire to.
i think the only people who have done it happily are mechanics who have the free time to play with them without too much cash investment. if you don't fall into that category i can't see it being worth it.
IP: Logged
03:29 PM
paulmckibben Member
Posts: 332 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Nov 2001
The 4tech can produce power with the right parts. The crank is weak and will not hold much power. This does not mean you cant mod it to get more out of it. Yes there is ways to get cheaper power. I am going to build a 2.5 here soon, not for killer performance, but better performance. I think the wow factor of a 2.5 performing is better than a known performance engine performing (like a 3800s/c or a sbc).