The Grand Am brakes are "plug-n-play" on the rear of the '84-87 Fiero. You simply remove the Fiero calipers and rotors, and bolt on the G/A ones. It's really that easy... well, aside from removing the now useless parking brake hardware.
IP: Logged
01:46 AM
GT2efiero Member
Posts: 285 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Registered: Jan 2007
Thanks for the info on the rear swap, but I have had it done for about 3 years now. I am about to do the fronts and just want to know if I can use the hubs off of the rear rotors because I understand that the hubs need to be machined off the rotor. So can I use the hubs off the rears for the front GA brakes?
IP: Logged
08:13 AM
AquaHusky Member
Posts: 1234 From: Sedalia, Mo Registered: Dec 2006
Why would you want to remove the parking brake? Isn't there another way to do this with removing it? For those of us in places where we need to have the parking brake to pass inspection.
------------------ I gots the baddest Fiero on BRICKS!
IP: Logged
09:33 AM
James Bond 007 Member
Posts: 8872 From: California.U.S.A. Registered: Dec 2002
Why would you want to remove the parking brake? Isn't there another way to do this with removing it? For those of us in places where we need to have the parking brake to pass inspection.
No you don't have to remove the emergency brake,just wire it to the chassie or coil spring.You will be useing 4 FRONT calipers,2 in the front and 2 in the rear.There is now nothing for the emergency brake to attach to.Because of your inspection you can can probubly only do the front.But it allso depends on how through the break inspection is,it would probubly pass a visual inspection.
**************************************************************************************** goatnipples2002 As far as I know,if you plan on useing the rear rotars up front for the hub,(but not for the Fiero rotars as Grand am rotars),I beleave the Grand am are a diffrent size.As for useing the rear up front for the hubs they should be the same size as the front and yes,they should work,for the hubs only.
IP: Logged
10:47 AM
fierohoho Member
Posts: 3494 From: Corner of No and Where Registered: Apr 2001
For the front GA upgrade you don't use any parts from the rear.
You remove the front rotor/hub and it has to be machined down so the GA rotor will just fit over it.
Then you have to do a little grinding to the area of the caliper mount so it will clear the GA rotor, this does not affect how the GA calpiper will mount.
Give me a few minutes and I'll post a couple pics.
Steve
IP: Logged
10:52 AM
fierohoho Member
Posts: 3494 From: Corner of No and Where Registered: Apr 2001
OK, so Goatie you want to use the rear Fiero hubs on the front? I don't see that happening. Chopping off the front rotors would be childplay in comparison.
I was just checking since I have my old rear rotors laying around.
From the pics I can't tell what needs to be ground but I am sure I will see it once I get down there.
I am not too concerned about the fronts sticking out more as I will be dropping it about 1.5 coils and that should reduce the visual effects of the front wheels.
IP: Logged
01:53 PM
fierohoho Member
Posts: 3494 From: Corner of No and Where Registered: Apr 2001
Is there dimenions somewhere that tell exactly how to machine down the front rotors? I want to do this and my machinist needs to know what all needs to be done. Thanks.
[This message has been edited by tuner2m6t (edited 02-27-2007).]
IP: Logged
12:24 AM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
Measure the inside diameter of the "hats" on the GA rotors, and machine the Fiero hubs accordingly. I think the most popular method is to turn 'em down on a lathe.
[This message has been edited by Blacktree (edited 02-27-2007).]
IP: Logged
01:39 AM
86GT3.4DOHC Member
Posts: 10007 From: Marion Ohio Registered: Apr 2004
I was just checking since I have my old rear rotors laying around.
From the pics I can't tell what needs to be ground but I am sure I will see it once I get down there.
I am not too concerned about the fronts sticking out more as I will be dropping it about 1.5 coils and that should reduce the visual effects of the front wheels.
Its not about how it looks, its about how it throws off the suspension geometry, your front wheels will be tracking to the outside of the rear wheels.
Its been mentioned several times before, and makes sense, thats why you need longer studs, the front rotors are one piece on the side of the hub, they have no hat that goes over the hub.
IP: Logged
08:17 AM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
I hope you realize that the front and rear track width on the Fiero is not the same. The rear wheels have a wider track. Even with the added thickness of the GA rotors in front, the rear track will still be wider.
IP: Logged
11:35 AM
86GT3.4DOHC Member
Posts: 10007 From: Marion Ohio Registered: Apr 2004
I hope you realize that the front and rear track width on the Fiero is not the same. The rear wheels have a wider track. Even with the added thickness of the GA rotors in front, the rear track will still be wider.
I've never heard this before, never even heard it suggested. Do you have refrences?
Still, its not what it was designed for, but that would make it much less of a problem.
IP: Logged
01:45 PM
86GT3.4DOHC Member
Posts: 10007 From: Marion Ohio Registered: Apr 2004
Well I measured, center of tread to center of tread, rear is 60" 1/16th front is 59" +/- 1/16"
In all the time I've been working with Fieros I had never heard about this. Its possible I measured wrong, but I dont think I'd have fudged a whole inch. Any official specs out there?
Still, with both rotors, you're going to be real close to evening out the front tires with the rear, not as bad as pushing them outside the rears, but I think I'll hold out
i could careless about the pushing the fronts out more my main concern is stopping faster and better with the added benefit of way cheaper brake components.
IP: Logged
08:12 PM
Feb 28th, 2007
86GT3.4DOHC Member
Posts: 10007 From: Marion Ohio Registered: Apr 2004
i could careless about the pushing the fronts out more my main concern is stopping faster and better with the added benefit of way cheaper brake components.
Thats all good and well, assuming you never want to turn during all this... You cant just blindly attack one system and ignore its effects on the rest of the car. I just want to go fast, but im not going to remove the breaking system to save weight. Giving the front end a wider stance is going to induce even more oversteer into a car with way too much already.
IP: Logged
07:48 AM
PFF
System Bot
Pyrthian Member
Posts: 29569 From: Detroit, MI Registered: Jul 2002
dont worry about the 1/2" added width. 1/4" per side. just changing tire widths makes bigger changes than this insignificant amount. and - it is a pontiac after all - wider is better anyways - people also have stiffer springs, stronger shocks & poly bushings.
IP: Logged
10:16 AM
86GT3.4DOHC Member
Posts: 10007 From: Marion Ohio Registered: Apr 2004
dont worry about the 1/2" added width. 1/4" per side. just changing tire widths makes bigger changes than this insignificant amount. and - it is a pontiac after all - wider is better anyways - people also have stiffer springs, stronger shocks & poly bushings.
Thats a good point, on my 88 I run wider tires in the rear than the front, and one could even compensate for the added rotor width by selecting the appropriate tire sizes.
IP: Logged
10:46 AM
Blacktree Member
Posts: 20770 From: Central Florida Registered: Dec 2001
86GT3.4DOHC said: Giving the front end a wider stance is going to induce even more oversteer into a car with way too much already.
Actually, the Fiero (in stock form) has too much UNDERsteer. The GM engineers built massive understeer into the suspension to counteract the rearward weight bias, and the trailing-throttle oversteer (in the '84-87 suspension). Besides, moving the front wheels 1/2" further apart isn't going to have any noticeable effect on the understeer/oversteer equation.
I learned about the different front/rear track widths when I looked at my Fiero's tire tracks in the dirt. I already knew the rear of the car (the body) was wider than the front. So when I noticed that the rear tire tracks were spaced further apart, it didn't surprise me. I never took any measurements, though. Grab a tape measure and see for yourself.
IP: Logged
12:20 PM
Mar 1st, 2007
fierodustin_86 Member
Posts: 970 From: Joplin, Missouri Registered: Aug 2002
The standard longer replacement studs are Dorman part number 610-323 or Advance Auto part number 98501. Napa has them too as 323. They are listed in their computers as longer Fiero studs. 12mm X 1.5 thread
IP: Logged
12:49 AM
fierohoho Member
Posts: 3494 From: Corner of No and Where Registered: Apr 2001
The standard longer replacement studs are Dorman part number 610-323 or Advance Auto part number 98501. Napa has them too as 323. They are listed in their computers as longer Fiero studs. 12mm X 1.5 thread