I've driven a lot of cars in my day, never been particularly easy on any of them, and I will say sometimes seat of the pants feel can be deceiving (even on braking!). I tried to find some actual brake tests on the Fiero (specifically the 85 - 87 V6 models) and it seems the data is not real easy to find.
Can someone confirm or rebuke the following data?
1986 Pontiac Fiero GT General Performance
New Price: $14,800
Options on test car: air conditioning, rear spoiler, optional subwoofer,
cruise control, rear defroster, power door locks
Engine:
2.8 liter Multi Port Fuel Injected V-6, iron block and heads
Engine management system:
Pontiac/Delco electronic
Power:
140 bhp @ 5200 rpm
170 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Redline:
6000 rpm
Drivetrain:
Transmission: 4-speed manual
Final-Drive ratio: 3.65:1
Ratios: top speed in gear (mph)
1 3.31 36
2 1.95 61
3 1.24 96
4 0.81 130
Dimensions and general:
Wheelbase: 93.4 in
Length: 165.1 in
Width: 69.0 in
Height: 46.9 in
Ground Clearance: 5 in
Curb Weight: 2778 pounds
Suspension:
Front: independant, unequal length A-arms, coil springs, tube shocks,
anti-roll bar
Rear: independant, chapman struts, lower A-arms, tie rods, coil springs,
tube shocks, anti-roll bar
Performance:
Stock
__________|_____________
/ \
92 BHP L-4 - 140 BHP V-6 - 190 BHP V-6 - 300 BHP V-8
0-30 3.3 - 2.2 - 1.8 - 1.3
0-40 5.0 - 3.8 - 3.3 - 2.6
0-50 7.5 - 5.4 - 4.4 - 3.4
0-60 10.9 - 7.5 - 5.7 - 4.9
1/4-mi 17.9 @ 77 - 15.7 @ 87 mph - 14.6 @ 97 mph - 13.0 @ 110 mph
Roadholding
300 ft skidpad .84g-.86g
Slalom 63.9 mph
55-0 braking 118 feet
60-0 braking 130 feet
70-0 braking 190 feet
Fade none
Mileage: 4-cylinder V-6
25 city/32 highway 21 city/28 highway
These posted numbers show an 86 Fiero braking from 70 – 0 mph in 190ft
Compared to these numbers from October 2004 Car and Driver the Fiero seems to have held up well when compared to newer cars unless the data above is total BS.
Acura TSX 70 – 0 mph in 194ft
Audi A4 1.8T 70 – 0 mph in 180ft
Subaru Legacy 2.5GT 70 – 0 mph in 196ft
Volvo S40 T5 70 – 0 mph in 166ft
It does seem that motorweek had the braking on the Fiero at around 125 ft from 55 – 0 mph where the above data says 118 ft. Seems like a big descrepency.
Anyone have some different sources for this kind of actual brake performance comparision?
I haven't tried searching the forum yet but it seems some in depth performance comparisons must have been done to show actual performance improvements for brake upgrades.
Edited to add a few more statistics I've run across, still not having much luck finding any independent tests on the Fiero.
From Car and Driver showdown
1994 CHEVROLET CAMARO Z28 70 - 0 mph 167ft
1994 FORD MUSTANG GT 70 - 0 mph 179ft
From Motor Trend
2003 Infiniti G35 Sport Sedan 60 - 0 mph 114ft
2003 Infiniti G35 Sport Coupe 60 - 0 mph 112ft
Edited one more time to add:
Been searching the forum and reading threads for a while now, getting tired.
I can't seem to find any actual comparison testing of any brake "upgrades" against the original brake system in "like-new" condition. All I seem to be able to find are seat of the pants comparisons with no details on the condition of the components/system replaced. Would be nice to see some actual statistics and test results.
[This message has been edited by DRA (edited 02-19-2007).]