The Trump Impeachment Proceedings (Page 2/49)
randye NOV 15, 12:36 AM
Meet Paul:



Hunter Biden is the son of former Democrat VP Joe Biden

Hunter Biden was making millions of dollars in Ukraine trading on his father's influence.

Paul is the son of another Democrat politician presently in Congress

Paul was also doing business and making huge sums of money in Ukraine just like Hunter Biden

Can you guess WHO Paul's mommy is?

[This message has been edited by randye (edited 11-15-2019).]

randye NOV 15, 02:41 AM
Meet John



Just like Hunter Biden and Paul, (post above), he has a famous Democrat parent in politics.

Just like Hunter Biden and Paul, John has received a LOT of money from the Ukraine.

John managed a Democrat political slush fund with this Ukrainian money through a company called Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC

Can you guess WHO John's step father is?
cliffw NOV 15, 07:47 AM


Tony Kania NOV 15, 11:15 AM

quote
Originally posted by randye:

Meet Paul:
...

Can you guess WHO Paul's mommy is?





I won't read farther:

I spoke of this. Mommy is an idiot, and watching her last night made my dick go soft.

While not always ahead, I never slow the pack down...



quote
Originally posted by randye:

Meet John
...

Can you guess WHO John's step father is?



Interesting!

[This message has been edited by Tony Kania (edited 11-15-2019).]

2.5 NOV 15, 12:21 PM
Are John, Hunter and Paul going to come to "justice"?

[This message has been edited by 2.5 (edited 11-15-2019).]

LitebulbwithaFiero NOV 15, 12:23 PM
I think John is Chris.
blackrams NOV 15, 03:12 PM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:
It still is not Rams, and girls still are not born with a penis.
.


Call it what you want, look up the definition of Proceedings. I chose that word intentionally because it is, an on going process or, proceeding.

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-15-2019).]

blackrams NOV 15, 03:13 PM
.

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-15-2019).]

cliffw NOV 16, 09:27 AM

quote
Originally posted by blackrams:
Call it what you want, look up the definition of Proceedings. I chose that word intentionally because it is, an on going process or, proceeding.



Fair enough Rams, you would be correct, thou generically so. You did include the modifier "impeachment", which is what I did not agree with. I would say impeachment proceedings begin when Articles of Impeachment are drawn up.
(By the way, my Lucy holding the football cartoon was not directed at you. It was after randye's post and in response to his use of the Roadrunners cartoon in your other thread.)

Back on topic ... again I tuned in shortly before I decided I would rather go out and enjoy the inclement weather. What strikes me as odd is that these sham proceedings are an attempt to win over the American voter. Forcing them to watch 45+ minutes of grinding sausage ? .
Then to see Shifty deny the bringing up of "Points of Order" and Shifty's denial to let any Republican's question to be asked ? .

Then, to see Shifty interrupt former Ukranian Ambassador Marie Ionovith's testimony to tell he how her President tweeted about her in real time just to ask her how it made her feel. She said intimidated and Shifty added another point of impeachment, witness intimidation. Even though she would never had known if not for Shift. It's sad a man's opinion can intimidate someone.

I am beginning to think Shifty is only educating the Dumbs in the House not to pass Articles of Impeachment.
blackrams NOV 16, 09:36 AM

quote
Originally posted by cliffw:


Fair enough Rams, you would be correct, thou generically so. You did include the modifier "impeachment", which is what I did not agree with. I would say impeachment proceedings begin when Articles of Impeachment are drawn up.
(By the way, my Lucy holding the football cartoon was not directed at you. It was after randye's post and in response to his use of the Roadrunners cartoon in your other thread.)

Back on topic ... again I tuned in shortly before I decided I would rather go out and enjoy the inclement weather. What strikes me as odd is that these sham proceedings are an attempt to win over the American voter. Forcing them to watch 45+ minutes of grinding sausage ? .
Then to see Shifty deny the bringing up of "Points of Order" and Shifty's denial to let any Republican's question to be asked ? .

Then, to see Shifty interrupt former Ukranian Ambassador Marie Ionovith's testimony to tell he how her President tweeted about her in real time just to ask her how it made her feel. She said intimidated and Shifty added another point of impeachment, witness intimidation. Even though she would never had known if not for Shift. It's sad a man's opinion can intimidate someone.

I am beginning to think Shifty is only educating the Dumbs in the House not to pass Articles of Impeachment.



This entire “Soap Opera” is not to impeach President Trump, it is meant to sway the minds of voters in the next election. The Dems know they don’t have the votes in the Senate. But, they are hoping to influence the next election in order to gain control of both the House and the Senate and maybe the Oval Office.

What I see though is more dirty politics coming out and dirty politicians taking care of their own. Randye has highlighted three of them.
Drain the damn swamp!

Rams

[This message has been edited by blackrams (edited 11-16-2019).]